ZTE Axon M
Laptopspecificaties
Price comparison
Gemiddelde van 15 score (van 31 beoordelingen)
Testrapporten voor de ZTE Axon M
Will that work? ZTE delivers the first "foldable" smartphone. While we would have imagined something else, the statement is right in principle. With its two displays and hinge in between, the Axon M reminds us a little of the old Nokia Communicator, but it can do so much more. What exactly that is, we gathered for you in our review.
Bron: NDTV Gadgets EN→NL Archive.org version
ZTE doesn't launch a lot of phones in India, and we don't have confirmation about whether the Axon M will come here at all. If or when it does, we'll put it through all our usual tests and spend enough time with it to give you an idea of how it might work as your next primary device.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 01-03-2018
Bron: G Style Magazine EN→NL Archive.org version
I respect ZTE for trying something different(but not new) as we have grown accustomed to a candy bar style of smartphone but right now that form factor is working. Especially with behemoth displays getting over 6” depending which phone you use. I think it has potential but I’d like to see maybe if ZTE can do it without the glaring fold in the middle, utilize more screen real estate and also not make the glass so glossy. The price tag isn’t going to garner much buyers too with its coming out to $724 and is exclusively under the AT&T brand.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 06-02-2018
Bron: CNet EN→NL Archive.org version
The ZTE Axon M has a heavy and awkward design that's genuinely useful for gaming and multitasking. But if you're not down to go double, spend your money on either a top-tier phone, or a cheaper phone with the same specs as the Axon M.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 06-12-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 72% prestatie: 80% mobiliteit: 70% afwerking: 60%
Bron: Phone Arena EN→NL Archive.org version
When it comes down to it, this isn’t the worst effort ZTE could have made, although it is a bit half-baked, and the Axon M falls short in key areas. Unfortunately, software is the one of the most deficient areas of the M. Simply stretching and splitting content in accordance with the in-built functionalities of the Android OS leaves the user with a rather slapdash user experience. Games can’t take advantage of the large double screen in any real way, videos are rather unpleasant with the black bar in the middle, and transitions between screen modes are often dreadfully unresponsive.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 23-11-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 40%
Bron: Tom's Guide EN→NL Archive.org version
ZTE's dual-screen folding smartphone looks, runs and feels like nothing else on the market. But when it comes to smartphones, more isn't always better.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 23-11-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 50%
Bron: Zdnet.com EN→NL Archive.org version
The ZTE Axon M is clearly a unique smartphone with the two displays. ZTE has done a good job of building a solid smartphone that performed flawlessly for me. This wasn't easy considering there are different screen modes to manage.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 21-11-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 77%
Bron: Android Authority EN→NL Archive.org version
It isn’t enough to just put another screen on an existing smartphone if it doesn’t first address its core experience – and that, in a nutshell, is the main problem with the ZTE Axon M. It gets us excited to see what comes next, but unless you’re actually looking for a dual screen phone, simply having this one won’t dramatically change your Android life.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 19-11-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70% prestatie: 70% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 70% afwerking: 80%
Bron: PC Mag EN→NL Archive.org version
The ZTE Axon M for AT&T has a unique design that folds out to reveal a second display, effectively transforming the phone into a small tablet, but there are some kinks to work out.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 16-11-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Android Authority EN→NL Archive.org version
We’ve seen a lot of interesting smartphones in 2017, but the Axon M stands out as the most unique device this year, and arguably in the past few years, too. There’s no doubt the Axon M is going to catch your attention, but do you think it offers enough? What do you think of ZTE’s latest attempt at being different? Do you need two screens? Are foldable displays the next big trend or nothing more than a clever gimmick like 3D cameras?
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 18-10-2017
Bron: Techradar EN→NL Archive.org version
The ZTE Axon M is the wildcard smartphone of late 2017, and we’re eager to see how it performs and is received. This an ambitious design idea that makes a lot of sense for the future of smartphones.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 17-10-2017
Bron: PC Mag EN→NL Archive.org version
The ZTE Axon M for AT&T has a unique design that folds out to reveal a second display, effectively transforming the phone into a small tablet.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 17-10-2017
Bron: Android Pit DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 01-03-2018
Bron: Curved DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 27-02-2018
Bron: Tuexperto ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 27-02-2018
Bron: Movil Zona ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 17-02-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70% prijs: 70% prestatie: 70% beeldscherm: 70% mobiliteit: 70% afwerking: 70%
Bron: Xataka ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 16-02-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 74% prestatie: 85% beeldscherm: 70% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 75%
Bron: Computerhoy ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 13-02-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 72% prijs: 70% functionaliteiten: 80% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 70% afwerking: 60%
Bron: El Androide Libre ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 13-02-2018
Bron: Smartphone Italia IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 28-05-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70% prijs: 60% functionaliteiten: 70% beeldscherm: 90% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 90% ergonomie: 90%
Bron: Tech Different IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 15-05-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 68% beeldscherm: 70% mobiliteit: 75% ergonomie: 50%
Bron: Panorama IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 01-05-2018
Bron: Smartphone Italia IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 20-04-2018
Bron: Techzilla.it IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 09-04-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 64% prijs: 65% beeldscherm: 75% mobiliteit: 70% afwerking: 50%
Bron: Leonardo.it Tech IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 06-04-2018
Bron: AndroidWorld.it IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 15-03-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70% prijs: 70% functionaliteiten: 65% beeldscherm: 75% mobiliteit: 60% afwerking: 80% ergonomie: 80%
Bron: Andrea Galeazzi IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 24-02-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 69% prijs: 65% beeldscherm: 65% mobiliteit: 70% afwerking: 90%
Bron: Panorama IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 23-02-2018
Bron: HDblog.it IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 22-02-2018
Bron: AndroidPit.fr FR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 02-03-2018
Bron: Phonandroid FR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 27-02-2018
Bron: The Gioididong VN→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 06-12-2017
Commentaar
Qualcomm Adreno 530:
Geïntegreerde grafische kaart in de Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 die geklokt is aan maximaal 624 MHz. In het begin van 2016 is het een high-end grafische kaart voor Android-gebaseerde smartphones en tablets die zelfs zeer veeleisende games zou moeten aankunnen.
De meeste niet-veeleisende huidige games kunnen vloeiend draaien. Wees voorbereid op verminderde grafische weergave door lage detailinstellingen en lage resoluties. Toch verschaffen deze kaarten voldoende prestatie voor kantoor taken en video bekijken (niet voor HD videos).
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Grafische Kaarten en de passende Benchmark Tabel.
SD 821:
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Processors.
5.20": Dit scherm is al redelijk groot voor een smartphone, maar wordt veelvuldig toegepast.
Grote schermformaten laten hogere resoluties toe. Details zoals letters zijn groter. Anderzijds is het energieverbruik lager bij kleine schermdiagonalen en de toestellen zijn kleiner, lichter en goedkoper.
>>Om de fijnheid van het scherm te vinden, kijk in onze DPI-lijst.
68.06%: Dit cijfer is slecht. De meeste notebooks hebben een hoger cijfer. Dit is niet aanbevolen bij aankoop.
>> De verdere informatie kan worden gevonden in onze hulp voor de aankoop van laptops.