ZTE Axon 20 5G
Laptopspecificaties
Secundaire Camera: 32 MPix f/2.0
Price comparison
Gemiddelde van 10 score (van 24 beoordelingen)
Testrapporten voor de ZTE Axon 20 5G
Bron: TechTablets
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 09-03-2021
Bron: DxOMark EN→NL
Crucially for those looking for all the bells and whistles of a quad-cam smartphone, the Axon 20 5G is disappointing for bokeh, telephoto zoom, and night photos. While 4K at 60 fps capture with effective stabilization is a nice draw for video enthusiasts, slow autofocus and exposure instabilities make the device difficult to recommend highly for video. More casual shooters, happy with a consistent and stable device that shoots reasonable quality standard or ultra-wide stills in good lighting, will be more at ease with the ZTE Axon 20 5G’s performance.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 03-03-2021
Bron: DxOMark EN→NL
ZTE’s ambitious under-display design for the front camera of the Axon 20 5G is esthetically impressive, but anyone who cares about selfie performance enough to read a review like this should probably look elsewhere. The performance compromises required to realize this design lead to seriously sub-par imaging when measured by nearly any metric. However, users who don’t care about the front camera at all should still consider this phone, as it appears to be a solid offering in other respects, and the hidden selfie cam is a neat trick for people who might use it only rarely.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 18-02-2021
Bron: Yugatech
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 14-02-2021
Bron: Yugatech
Hands-On, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 07-02-2021
Bron: Neowin EN→NL
Before I got to try this phone, and with no prior experience with ZTE, I kind of expected this to be a phone that focuses exclusively on doing one thing and fails at everything else. That isn't really the case, though. I was really happy with the performance, battery life, and the overall quality of the display and sound. ZTE gets a lot of the basics right, and on top of that, it adds the unique proposition of an under-display camera, and all of that costs about as much as you'd expect a phone with these specs to cost. You're not charged a ludicrous amount of money for a poorly implemented innovation.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 30-01-2021
Beoordeling: Totale score: 65%
Bron: Neowin
We go hands-on with the world's first smartphone with an under-display camera, the ZTE Axon 20 5G. It has a Snapdragon 765G, 8GB of RAM, 128GB of storage, and it costs $449.
Hands-On, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 16-01-2021
Bron: Tech Advisor EN→NL
Early adopters will probably enjoy the novelty of the ZTE Axon 20 5G, but the compromises to the selfie camera, face unlock, and display quality make this hard to recommend to most – though if you really never take selfies, you may find the large screen and solid spec sheet enough to win you over.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 15-01-2021
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: CNet EN→NL Archive.org version
ZTE raced to be first to release a mass-produced phone, the Axon 20 5G, with an under-display camera. But being first doesn't equate to stellar camera performance.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 23-12-2020
Bron: GSM Arena EN→NL Archive.org version
Someone has to be the first, and in this case, it's the Axon 20 5G. A phone with a first-gen tech that makes it really cool and also disappointing at the same time. The issue is that the under-display selfie cam is too blurry and not up to the standards in 2020. There's also a visible square where the camera is located, but we can let that one pass as it's barely visible.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 22-12-2020
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Pocket Lint EN→NL Archive.org version
It might be an outlier, as a little-known brand in the West, but this ZTE is a nod to the future, showing off a convincing under-screen camera, while delivering a long-lasting and ample performance in a fairly affordable package. It's in the details - autobrightness adjustment, frame-like screen bezel, and so-so cameras overall - where it sometimes misses the mark.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 21-12-2020
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Tom's Guide EN→NL Archive.org version
Overall, we prefer the Google Pixel 4a 5G because of its better cameras. And spending a little more money will net you the excellent OnePlus Nord, which is a pretty big step-up in UX and photography quality from the Axon 20 5G. Despite ZTE's impressive party trick, there are a few too many caveats to make this Android phone a top pick.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 21-12-2020
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Computerhoy ES→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 21-03-2021
Beoordeling: Totale score: 75% functionaliteiten: 90% beeldscherm: 70% mobiliteit: 70% afwerking: 90%
Bron: Xataka ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 21-12-2020
Beoordeling: Totale score: 79% prestatie: 88% beeldscherm: 83% mobiliteit: 83% afwerking: 88%
Bron: AndroidWorld.it IT→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 26-01-2021
Beoordeling: Totale score: 78% prijs: 80% functionaliteiten: 80% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 75% afwerking: 85% ergonomie: 85%
Bron: Andrea Galeazzi IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 21-12-2020
Beoordeling: Totale score: 77% prijs: 80% beeldscherm: 81% mobiliteit: 72% afwerking: 70%
Bron: Frandroid FR→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 01-02-2021
Bron: Top for Phone FR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 04-12-2020
Bron: Smartmania.cz CZ→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 01-03-2021
Bron: Cell Phones VN→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 21-09-2020
Bron: Genk VN→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 20-09-2020
Bron: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 19-09-2020
Bron: XT Mobile VN→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 19-09-2020
Bron: Unlimited Tech →NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 20-03-2021
Beoordeling: Totale score: 85%
Commentaar
Qualcomm Adreno 620:
De meeste niet-veeleisende huidige games kunnen vloeiend draaien. Wees voorbereid op verminderde grafische weergave door lage detailinstellingen en lage resoluties. Toch verschaffen deze kaarten voldoende prestatie voor kantoor taken en video bekijken (niet voor HD videos).
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Grafische Kaarten en de passende Benchmark Tabel.
SD 765G:
Snelle mid-range ARM-SoC met 8 CPU Kryo 475-cores (één snelle ARM Cortex-A76 prime core tot 2,4 GHz, één A76 gold core tot 2,2 GHz en 6 kleine ARM Cortex-A55-cores tot 1,8 GHz). Als een van de eerste SoC's integreert het ook een 5G-modem (Snapdragon X52 tot 3,7 / 1,6 Mbps down- en upload, mmWave en Sub-6-ondersteuning). De processor is vervaardigd in het moderne en energiezuinige 7nm EUV-proces bij Samsung.
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Processors.
6.92": Er bestaan maar weinig smartphones met een groter scherm.
Grote schermformaten laten hogere resoluties toe. Details zoals letters zijn groter. Anderzijds is het energieverbruik lager bij kleine schermdiagonalen en de toestellen zijn kleiner, lichter en goedkoper.
>>Om de fijnheid van het scherm te vinden, kijk in onze DPI-lijst.
74.9%: Dit cijfer is slecht. De meeste notebooks hebben een hoger cijfer. Dit is niet aanbevolen bij aankoop.
>> De verdere informatie kan worden gevonden in onze hulp voor de aankoop van laptops.