Xiaomi Redmi Pro
Laptopspecificaties
Price comparison
Gemiddelde van 13 score (van 25 beoordelingen)
Testrapporten voor de Xiaomi Redmi Pro
Bron: AndroidWorld.nl Archive.org version
Het is duidelijk dat Xiaomi bij de ontwikkeling van de Redmi Pro uit zijn comfortzone is gestapt. Dat moest ook: gewoon goede en betaalbare smartphones maken doet de concurrentie ook en dat kost Xiaomi marktaandeel. De Redmi Pro is een experiment, een visitekaartje dat laat zien wat Xiaomi in huis heeft.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 08-10-2016
Anderstalige testrapporten
Bron: Neowin EN→NL Archive.org version
The Redmi Pro is a very good smartphone and once again Xiaomi has struck the perfect balance between features and pricing. Its top variants may be perceived as expensive by some, but they do have additional storage, RAM, and a better chipset in them.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 15-01-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 85%
Bron: DP Review EN→NL Archive.org version
In its price bracket the Xiaomi Redmi Pro can score a lot of points with its premium look and materials, a bright and sharp OLED display and very good battery life. The 13MP camera delivers good color and exposure across the ISO range but our test sample suffered from strong lens softness away from the center of the frame.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 08-11-2016
Bron: Digital Trends EN→NL Archive.org version
No, not if you live in the U.S. or U.K. The lack of 4G connectivity in the U.S. is a serious problem. The phone is great, the camera extremely competent, and its special features highly enticing. We even like MIUI. Add in that we don’t have to spend much to buy it, and under any other circumstances, we’d be telling you to rush out and buy it right now. Sadly, the lack of connectivity makes the Redmi Pro a no go.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 02-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Techspot EN→NL Archive.org version
With that said, there are some reasons to consider the Redmi Pro. Xiaomi clearly has the best mid-range phone design and battery life of the trio, and the depth sensing features could appeal to some. At $250 for the 64GB model, the Redmi Pro also provides a lot more storage than either the Nexus 5X or Moto G4 Plus, which only include 16 GB at that price (and the 5X doesn’t include expandable storage). When storage is factored in, and you end up saving $30-50, this could swing things in favor of Xiaomi’s strongest mid-range offering.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 28-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 65%
Bron: Igeekphone EN→NL Archive.org version
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 advanced version and Redmi Pro standard version have much similarity in hardware, although they are different in price. Redmi Pro is better than Redmi Note 4 in design, holding feel and camera. But Redmi Note 4 has better price. And Redmi Note 4 advanced version is the first to improve to ROM 64GB . Under this kind of specs, Redmi Note 4 advanced version has better price. Therefore, if you care more about design and camera, Redmi Pro is more suitable for you. But if you don’t mind USB type c port and dual rear camera, Redmi Note 4 will be a good choice.
Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 24-09-2016
Bron: Android Headlines EN→NL Archive.org version
Almost no one does value better than Xiaomi in the smartphone market, and the Redmi Pro is proof of that. Top tier hardware build and design, tons of software features and great battery life are a few of the highlights of the Redmi Pro. Better than average sound output and camera performance in this price category are also worth noting, and an excellent display coupled with great every day and gaming performance round out the device as a whole.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 22-09-2016
Bron: Tech Advisor EN→NL Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Redmi Pro offers unbeatable value for money at around £250, undercutting every flagship yet offering much the same performance and many comparable features. Due to the lack of Google Play and a number of Chinese preinstalled apps we’d recommend Xiaomi phones only to seasoned Android users, however.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 21-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prijs: 90% prestatie: 90% functionaliteiten: 80% afwerking: 80%
Bron: GSM Arena EN→NL Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Redmi Pro will have an easy time drawing eyes to itself if people figure out that dual cameras are a feature they like to have on their phone. And this may happen sooner than later having in mind the iPhone 7 Plus has a dual camera setup as well. But even if you are not that much into the faux bokeh effects, the Redmi Pro with its large battery, punchy screen, solid metal build and reasonably quick performance, is an excellent deal all-around.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 19-09-2016
Bron: Yugatech EN→NL Archive.org version
The Redmi Pro is one of the devices in the market right out the gives you the best value for your hard-earned money. With its OLED display, interesting camera setup, and smooth performance, Xiaomi still managed to keep the pricing low. Howver, they are not releasing any new devices in the market officially, so we’ll have to rely on other sellers to bring it here. Widget City is selling the device for Php13,500 in black, gray, or gold colors (see listing here).
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 26-08-2016
Bron: WinFuture DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 17-01-2017
Bron: Curved DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 07-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 85% prestatie: 85% beeldscherm: 83% mobiliteit: 78%
Bron: Kustruki ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 24-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 86% prestatie: 90%
Bron: FAQsAndroid ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 22-08-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prijs: 80% prestatie: 85% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 75% afwerking: 85%
Bron: Pplware PT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 12-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 89% prestatie: 90% beeldscherm: 95% afwerking: 90%
Bron: Optima IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 25-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 68% prijs: 70% beeldscherm: 60% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Cinafoniaci IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 04-10-2016
Bron: Smartphone e tablet android IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 29-09-2016
Beoordeling: prestatie: 80% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Tecnoandroid.it IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 14-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 73% functionaliteiten: 80% mobiliteit: 75% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Leonardo.it Tech IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 30-08-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 75% prijs: 70% beeldscherm: 75% mobiliteit: 78% afwerking: 75% ergonomie: 70%
Bron: AndroidWorld.it IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 22-08-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 85% prijs: 80% beeldscherm: 85% ergonomie: 85%
Bron: Andrea Galeazzi IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 21-08-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prijs: 80% afwerking: 89%
Bron: Hi-Tech Mail RU→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 25-10-2016
Bron: Mobilenet.cz CZ→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 14-09-2016
Bron: Mobilizujeme CZ→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 21-08-2016
Commentaar
ARM Mali-T880 MP4:
Mobile grafische kaart voor tablets en smartphones, die aangetroffen wordt in ARM-SoC's als de HiSilicon Kirin 950.
De meeste niet-veeleisende huidige games kunnen vloeiend draaien. Wees voorbereid op verminderde grafische weergave door lage detailinstellingen en lage resoluties. Toch verschaffen deze kaarten voldoende prestatie voor kantoor taken en video bekijken (niet voor HD videos).
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Grafische Kaarten en de passende Benchmark Tabel.
unknown:
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Processors.
5.50": Dit scherm is al redelijk groot voor een smartphone, maar wordt veelvuldig toegepast.
Grote schermformaten laten hogere resoluties toe. Details zoals letters zijn groter. Anderzijds is het energieverbruik lager bij kleine schermdiagonalen en de toestellen zijn kleiner, lichter en goedkoper.
>>Om de fijnheid van het scherm te vinden, kijk in onze DPI-lijst.
77.77%: Dit cijfer is niet echt overtuigend. Het moet in acht worden genomen dat er bijna geen laptops zijn die een score onder de 60% hebben. Dit notebook is beneden gemiddeld beoordeeld, en is niet aanbevolen te kopen.
>> De verdere informatie kan worden gevonden in onze hulp voor de aankoop van laptops.