Xiaomi Mi Note 2
Laptopspecificaties
Secundaire Camera: 8 MPix 8 MP, f/2.0, autofocus
Price comparison
Gemiddelde van 20 score (van 46 beoordelingen)
Testrapporten voor de Xiaomi Mi Note 2
Bron: Tech Advisor EN→NL Archive.org version
The Mi Note 2 was wrongly overshadowed at its launch. This is a gorgeous big-screen Android phone with very decent performance, a great camera and plenty of storage. We'd like to see a Quad-HD screen on Xiaomi's flagship phone, but this one should prove plenty sharp and clear. Google apps are not preinstalled, but there is a workaround if you are happy to do some tweaking.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 12-07-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90%
Bron: Tech Advisor EN→NL Archive.org version
The Mi Note 2 was wrongly overshadowed at its launch. This is a gorgeous big-screen Android phone with very decent performance, a great camera and plenty of storage. We'd like to see a Quad-HD screen on Xiaomi's flagship phone, but this one should prove plenty sharp and clear. Google apps are not preinstalled, but there is a workaround if you are happy to do some tweaking.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 13-03-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90%
Bron: Android Authority EN→NL Archive.org version
Once you get to know the device inside and out, you’ll soon realize that the Xiaomi Mi Note 2 offers an experience that is quite compelling in both hardware and software, and instead of just being a clone, is instead a worthy alternative to the Galaxy Note 7.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 07-02-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 86% prestatie: 90% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 95% afwerking: 85%
Bron: Slashgear EN→NL Archive.org version
If we were getting this device for the price it goes for in China, converted directly to USD, it’d be a real deal. As it stands, we still need to go through 3rd-party retailers to get the device. I mean the standard 128GB version in China, which can be found for around RMB 3299 which is around $480 USD, compared to the version we have. We have the version called Mi Note 2 Global.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 30-01-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Fudzilla EN→NL Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Note 2 is not a Samsung Note 7 rip-off, but even if it was, the Note 7 is dead anyway. The Note 2 is not original either. It’s not a cheap phone, but it’s still somewhat cheaper than similar devices from mainstream brands. It’s might not be as big as you’d expect from a 5.7-inch beast, yet it doesn’t exactly have a small footprint (Samsung still beats it on account of its smaller bezels, made possibly by the curvier AMOLED display). That’s sort of our problem with the Mi Note 2. It feels like it was designed by a committee.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 21-12-2016
Bron: GSM Arena EN→NL Archive.org version
We approached the Xiaomi Mi Note 2 review with high expectations. The vacant spot left by Samsung's phablet this fall season was prime for the taking and we really wanted to see the Mi Note 2 as a product that's as at least as much disruptive as its pedigree suggests.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 09-12-2016
Bron: Tech Advisor EN→NL Archive.org version
The Mi Note 2 was wrongly overshadowed at its launch. This is a gorgeous big-screen Android phone with very decent performance, a great camera and plenty of storage. We'd like to see a Quad-HD screen on Xiaomi's flagship phone, but this one should prove plenty sharp and clear. Google apps are not preinstalled, but there is a workaround if you are happy to do some tweaking.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 08-12-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90% prijs: 90% prestatie: 90%
Bron: Manila Shaker EN→NL Archive.org version
Xiaomi MI Note 2 is expected at P28,990 $580 for the version with 4GB RAM and 64GB storage while higher specced version will land at about P34,990 or $700 6GB/128GB variant.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 07-12-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 75% prijs: 90% prestatie: 70% beeldscherm: 60% mobiliteit: 90% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Forbes EN→NL Archive.org version
Is the Mi Note 2 going to win acclaim this year? Probably not. The unveiling of the Mi Mix all but guaranteed that it’ll be taking a backseat. But priced at just $413 ($2800 rmb) and $488 (3300 rmb), this is — like most Xiaomi phones — one of the best value smartphone on the market. You’re getting a Snapdragon 821 device, with 4/6GB of RAM and a great build for half the price of the Google Pixel.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 05-11-2016
Bron: Hardware Zone EN→NL Archive.org version
The original Mi Note was well-spec’ed and launched with a lot of fanfare, but for whatever reason - maybe it’s the price, maybe it’s just the wrong timing - it didn’t help Xiaomi crack the premium smartphone segment. As Samsung stumbles, there’s now a sliver of opening here, a great chance that I’m sure the Chinese and Taiwanese companies would not let slip. The Xiaomi Mi Note 2, packed with all the technical and practical wizardry CEO Lei Jun and his team could muster, couldn’t have arrived at a better time. Well, at least for the good folks in China.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 30-10-2016
Bron: Igeekphone EN→NL Archive.org version
In conclusion, Xiaomi mi note 2 keeps the good level in its inner design and craftsmanship, although there is no big innovation, it’s good for maintenance. The most improvement of Xiaomi mi note 2 is to use dual curved screen. So are you ready to catch one?
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 28-10-2016
Bron: Igeekphone EN→NL Archive.org version
Xiaomi MI Note 2 uses dual curved 3D glass with great holding grip. We can confirm Xiaomi MI Note 2 is the most beautiful smartphone until now. It’s 5.7inch screen with ultra narrow frame which makes us fall in love with it deeply. So we are quite satisfied with the design, as for hardware, Xiaomi mi note 2 doesn’t let us down, Snapdragon 821 processor, RAM 4GB ROM 64GB, RAM 6GB ROM 128GB, two versions, and 8MP front camera and 23MP back camera. Most importantly, it sells at the most competitive price right now. So are you ready to get one?
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 26-10-2016
Bron: Gear Open EN→NL Archive.org version
Concerning the packaging, we witness the new trend with the box. Instead of mimicking Apple’s iPhone box, Xiaomi came up with their idea which seems to be perfection. Xiaomi has decided to walk with simplicity and elegance as the package appears to be plain white with an engraved Mi Logo at the center. We observe no diagram of Xiaomi Mi Note 2 at all.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 26-10-2016
Bron: Lowyat.net EN→NL Archive.org version
It was a very well-documented fact that Xiaomi’s new Mi Note 2 would be a device that had a dual-curve display. Previously a feature unique only to Samsung devices, Xiaomi and others are now jumping on the bandwagon.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 25-10-2016
Bron: CNet EN→NL Archive.org version
While there's a version of the Mi Note 2 that will have LTE support for the US and lots of other countries, the bad news is that the phone will be China-only, and Xiaomi has no plans to sell this elsewhere, even in places like Singapore or Hong Kong. It's a surprising move, but perhaps Xiaomi is looking inwards to its homeground as it aims to regain market share, having slipped to fourth position as rivals Oppo and Vivo have surged ahead.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 24-10-2016
Bron: Blick DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 08-06-2017
Bron: Computerbase DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 28-12-2016
Bron: ChinaMobileMag DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 27-12-2016
Bron: PC Welt DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 22-12-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 86% prestatie: 96% functionaliteiten: 90% beeldscherm: 89% mobiliteit: 91%
Bron: Golem DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 16-12-2016
Bron: ChinaMobileMag DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 14-12-2016
Bron: Curved DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 23-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 91% prestatie: 92% beeldscherm: 91% mobiliteit: 90%
Bron: Chinahandys.net DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 12-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 93% prestatie: 100% beeldscherm: 70% mobiliteit: 90% afwerking: 100%
Bron: ZDNet DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 25-10-2016
Bron: Profesional Review ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 28-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 89% prijs: 90% prestatie: 90% mobiliteit: 90% afwerking: 90%
Bron: Andro 4 All ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 18-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 82%
Bron: El Confidencial ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 07-11-2016
Bron: El Confidencial ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 25-10-2016
Bron: Pplware PT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 25-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 85% prestatie: 90% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 90% afwerking: 87%
Bron: Pplware PT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 10-11-2016
Bron: Key for web IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 30-01-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% functionaliteiten: 80% beeldscherm: 60% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Batista70Phone IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 16-12-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prijs: 60% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 90% ergonomie: 50%
Bron: Techzilla.it IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 13-12-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 83% prijs: 80% prestatie: 90% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 90% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Chimera Revo IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 11-12-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 77% prijs: 70% functionaliteiten: 80% mobiliteit: 75% afwerking: 87% ergonomie: 87%
Bron: Smartphone e tablet android IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 06-12-2016
Beoordeling: prestatie: 90% beeldscherm: 90% mobiliteit: 90% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Pianeta Cellulare IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 29-11-2016
Bron: Cinafoniaci IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 28-11-2016
Bron: Andrea Galeazzi IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 27-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 83% prijs: 72% mobiliteit: 85% afwerking: 89%
Bron: Leonardo.it Tech IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 13-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 87% prijs: 85% functionaliteiten: 98% beeldscherm: 65% mobiliteit: 89% ergonomie: 82%
Bron: Pianeta Cellulare IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 12-11-2016
Bron: AndroidWorld.it IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 11-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 83% prijs: 75% functionaliteiten: 90% beeldscherm: 75% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 85% ergonomie: 85%
Bron: Komorkomania PL→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 26-10-2016
Bron: Komorkomania PL→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 21-10-2016
Bron: Hi-Tech Mail RU→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 09-01-2017
Bron: Svet Androida CZ→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 21-11-2016
Bron: Android Portal SK→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 16-01-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 89% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 90% afwerking: 90%
Commentaar
Qualcomm Adreno 530:
Geïntegreerde grafische kaart in de Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 die geklokt is aan maximaal 624 MHz. In het begin van 2016 is het een high-end grafische kaart voor Android-gebaseerde smartphones en tablets die zelfs zeer veeleisende games zou moeten aankunnen.
De meeste niet-veeleisende huidige games kunnen vloeiend draaien. Wees voorbereid op verminderde grafische weergave door lage detailinstellingen en lage resoluties. Toch verschaffen deze kaarten voldoende prestatie voor kantoor taken en video bekijken (niet voor HD videos).
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Grafische Kaarten en de passende Benchmark Tabel.
SD 821:
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Processors.
5.70": Dit scherm is al redelijk groot voor een smartphone, maar wordt veelvuldig toegepast.
Grote schermformaten laten hogere resoluties toe. Details zoals letters zijn groter. Anderzijds is het energieverbruik lager bij kleine schermdiagonalen en de toestellen zijn kleiner, lichter en goedkoper.
>>Om de fijnheid van het scherm te vinden, kijk in onze DPI-lijst.
84.95%: Deze score moet gezien worden als gemiddeld, omdat het aantal notebooks dat hoger scoort ongeveer gelijk is aan het aantal dat lager scoort.
>> De verdere informatie kan worden gevonden in onze hulp voor de aankoop van laptops.