Vivo X51 5G
Laptopspecificaties
Secundaire Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.5, 26 mm, 1/2.8", 0.8 µm)
Price comparison
Gemiddelde van 37 score (van 57 beoordelingen)
Testrapporten voor de Vivo X51 5G
Vivo launches the X51 5G in Europe, which is nominally the X50 Pro already known from Asia. Besides software modifications and an optimized camera, the review reveals further positive improvements and enriches the market with an exciting alternative.
Bron: DxOMark EN→NL
The Vivo X51 5G turned in a generally disappointing performance in terms of autonomy, providing fewer hours of active use than its competitors in this review and across the database as a whole. That said, it did quite well in our gaming use case; further, it did better in terms of daytime efficiency, although its high power consumption at night is a bit concerning. Its charging performance was above average, and gamers will be pleased with its 21-second speed for achieving a 1% power boost — one of the very best times among all tested devices.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 10-05-2021
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Talk Android EN→NL
In short, the X51 5G promises a lot and mostly delivers, it’s just the price tag that weighs it down somewhat and restrains me from recommending it as a must-buy. This is unfortunate because Vivo almost had a winning formula with the X51 5G that offers something different from its fellow BKK stablemates only to be undone by its RRP of £749/€799 and the looming presence of the more powerful OnePlus 8T and Google’s £599 Pixel 5.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 19-04-2021
Bron: DxOMark EN→NL
The Vivo X51 5G can produce satisfying selfies when used with an awareness of its limitations. With the phone fairly close to the subject, it captures detailed, nicely exposed photos with pleasant color and wide dynamic range. However, selfie-stick users will be disappointed to find themselves in soft focus, as the focus distance and narrow depth of field makes for a relatively tight sweet spot in terms of sharpness. Video performance is let down by poor stabilization and narrow dynamic range, so serious vloggers will likely be better served by other options.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 04-02-2021
Bron: DxOMark EN→NL
Although positioned towards the top end of the mid-range price bracket, the inclusion of a quad camera makes the Vivo’s X51 5G a good value proposition. Its photography performance is more than competent, too, with no major weaknesses identified in our tests. Dual tele-lenses makes it a good option for portraits at 50 mm and longer-range zoom shots, too. Pleasant skin tones and wide depth of field also make it easy to recommend for those shooting lots of people pictures, but serious portrait photographers would appreciate better bokeh simulation.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 20-01-2021
Bron: T3 EN→NL
The Vivo X51 5G is worth investigating if you're after a phone that gives you premium-level specs, performance and camera quality without costing you a huge amount of money. It's still relatively expensive, but this is a phone that has plenty listed in the positives column.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 04-01-2021
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: DxOMark EN→NL Archive.org version
The Vivo X51 holds up well overall, even against some devices that are more expensive. The screen displays appropriate brightness under most conditions, though it could be a little brighter indoors and outdoors in the shade. The color rendering is fairly accurate across many uses, even with the blue light filter on. Its biggest drawbacks are for video; HDR10 content is much too dark, which has a big impact on the viewing experience. It also showed weaknesses in the touch attribute, where a lack of smoothness impaired the experiences of browsing and gaming.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 21-12-2020
Bron: Cool Smartphone EN→NL Archive.org version
Beautiful to look at, the X51 has a fantastic camera arrangement and is a joy to hold and use. It marks highly for everything, but the price is quite high when compared to the competition.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 26-11-2020
Beoordeling: Totale score: 91% prijs: 64% beeldscherm: 90% afwerking: 100%
Bron: Pocket Lint EN→NL Archive.org version
As Vivo's first push into wider markets, we think the X51 - which was called the X50 Pro at its eastern launch - is a bit of a revelation. It delivers an impressive gimbal stabilisation system, a decent overall camera setup, and solid build. The battery isn't class-leading, but at this price and with these features - plus the software has been improved for this launch - it looks like a future success for Vivo. Well, if the name wasn't so uninspired.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 20-11-2020
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Tech Advisor EN→NL Archive.org version
Is the Vivo X51 a good phone? Most certainly, with a solid camera, beautiful display, and phenomenal design. But at this price the X51 doesn't feel competitive. It's a great phone, but it's bad value.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 29-10-2020
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Techradar EN→NL Archive.org version
Vivo loves to push advanced features out there before the competition. The Vivo X51 5G is a vehicle for its ‘gimbal’ camera, which offers superb low-light performance and super-stable video. It’s a great advancement, but the price may seem a little high for a phone with a mid-tier CPU, even if it is a great one.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 22-10-2020
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Tech Advisor EN→NL Archive.org version
Is the Vivo X51 a good phone? Most certainly, with a solid camera, beautiful display, and phenomenal design. But at this price the X51 doesn't feel competitive. It's a great phone, but it's bad value.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 20-10-2020
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Trusted Reviews EN→NL Archive.org version
The Vivo X51 5G is a device packed with high-end features. The quad camera setup is made even more impressive by the built-in gimbal, while the addition of a 90Hz refresh rate and 5G makes this phone feel modern and future proof. The biggest downside here is the £749 price tag, elevating the phone beyond more recognisable household names, such as OnePlus and the Google Pixel. That said, it's difficult to complain of a lack of features with the Vivo X51 5G.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 20-10-2020
Bron: Tech Stage DE→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 17-02-2021
Bron: Chinahandys.net DE→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 30-01-2021
Beoordeling: Totale score: 78% prestatie: 60% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 90%
Bron: Go2 Mobile DE→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 01-01-2021
Beoordeling: Totale score: 79% prijs: 59% prestatie: 79% mobiliteit: 81% afwerking: 83%
Bron: Allround-PC.com DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 22-12-2020
Bron: Computerbild DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 16-12-2020
Beoordeling: Totale score: 89%
Bron: Basic Tutorials DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 05-12-2020
Beoordeling: Totale score: 82% prijs: 70% prestatie: 90% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 100%
Bron: Inside Handy DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 08-11-2020
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Nextpit Germany DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 25-10-2020
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Stadt-bremerhaven DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 24-10-2020
Bron: n-tv DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 20-10-2020
Bron: Computerbild DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 20-10-2020
Beoordeling: Totale score: 89%
Bron: Tuexperto ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 30-11-2020
Bron: Movil Zona ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 20-10-2020
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prijs: 80% prestatie: 80% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 80%
Bron: El Androide Libre ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 20-10-2020
Bron: Xataka ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 20-10-2020
Beoordeling: Totale score: 86% prestatie: 88% beeldscherm: 85% mobiliteit: 85% afwerking: 90%
Bron: Andro 4 All ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 20-10-2020
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90%
Bron: Androidiani IT→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 18-02-2021
Bron: Pianeta Cellulare IT→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 20-01-2021
Bron: Tech Different IT→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 11-01-2021
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90% functionaliteiten: 85% beeldscherm: 90% mobiliteit: 90%
Bron: Smartphone Italia IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 14-12-2020
Bron: Andrea Galeazzi IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 13-12-2020
Beoordeling: Totale score: 84% prijs: 79% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 86%
Bron: Notebook Italia IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 12-12-2020
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prijs: 65% prestatie: 85% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Techzilla.it IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 02-12-2020
Beoordeling: Totale score: 81% prijs: 80% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 90%
Bron: Chimera Revo IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 25-11-2020
Beoordeling: Totale score: 85%
Bron: Smartphone Italia IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 10-11-2020
Bron: Batista70Phone IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 03-11-2020
Bron: Tutto Android IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 20-10-2020
Beoordeling: Totale score: 84% prestatie: 88% mobiliteit: 75% afwerking: 88%
Bron: AndroidWorld.it IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 20-10-2020
Beoordeling: Totale score: 84% prijs: 60% functionaliteiten: 75% beeldscherm: 90% mobiliteit: 75% afwerking: 90% ergonomie: 90%
Bron: HDblog.it IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 20-10-2020
Beoordeling: Totale score: 78% functionaliteiten: 77%
Bron: Quotidiano Hardware Upgrade IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 20-10-2020
Bron: Everyeye.it IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 20-10-2020
Beoordeling: Totale score: 83%
Bron: Top for Phone FR→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 15-04-2021
Bron: Meilleurmobile FR→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 02-04-2021
Beoordeling: Totale score: 75%
Bron: Fredzone FR→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 31-01-2021
Beoordeling: Totale score: 89% beeldscherm: 90% mobiliteit: 85% afwerking: 90%
Bron: 01Net FR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 31-12-2020
Beoordeling: Totale score: 88% prestatie: 80% mobiliteit: 100%
Bron: Les Mobiles FR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 02-12-2020
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Frandroid FR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 07-11-2020
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prestatie: 70% beeldscherm: 90% mobiliteit: 90% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Journal du Geek FR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 20-10-2020
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90%
Bron: Phonandroid FR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 20-10-2020
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Nextpit France FR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 20-10-2020
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Komputerswiat PL→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 22-12-2020
Bron: Komputerswiat PL→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 29-10-2020
Bron: Tabletowo PL→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 29-10-2020
Beoordeling: Totale score: 89%
Bron: Android.com.pl PL→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 20-10-2020
Beoordeling: Totale score: 88% prestatie: 90% beeldscherm: 90% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 90%
Bron: Antyweb PL→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 20-10-2020
Commentaar
Qualcomm Adreno 620:
De meeste niet-veeleisende huidige games kunnen vloeiend draaien. Wees voorbereid op verminderde grafische weergave door lage detailinstellingen en lage resoluties. Toch verschaffen deze kaarten voldoende prestatie voor kantoor taken en video bekijken (niet voor HD videos).
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Grafische Kaarten en de passende Benchmark Tabel.
SD 765G:
Snelle mid-range ARM-SoC met 8 CPU Kryo 475-cores (één snelle ARM Cortex-A76 prime core tot 2,4 GHz, één A76 gold core tot 2,2 GHz en 6 kleine ARM Cortex-A55-cores tot 1,8 GHz). Als een van de eerste SoC's integreert het ook een 5G-modem (Snapdragon X52 tot 3,7 / 1,6 Mbps down- en upload, mmWave en Sub-6-ondersteuning). De processor is vervaardigd in het moderne en energiezuinige 7nm EUV-proces bij Samsung.
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Processors.
6.56": Er bestaan maar weinig smartphones met een groter scherm.
Grote schermformaten laten hogere resoluties toe. Details zoals letters zijn groter. Anderzijds is het energieverbruik lager bij kleine schermdiagonalen en de toestellen zijn kleiner, lichter en goedkoper.
>>Om de fijnheid van het scherm te vinden, kijk in onze DPI-lijst.
82.62%: Deze score moet gezien worden als gemiddeld, omdat het aantal notebooks dat hoger scoort ongeveer gelijk is aan het aantal dat lager scoort.
>> De verdere informatie kan worden gevonden in onze hulp voor de aankoop van laptops.