Vivo Nex Dual Display
Laptopspecificaties
Price comparison
Gemiddelde van 15 score (van 26 beoordelingen)
Testrapporten voor de Vivo Nex Dual Display
The highlight of the Vivo NEX Dual is its two displays. In addition to the traditional screen on the front, the NEX Dual has another AMOLED panel on the back. The latter means that you can take selfies with what would typically be rear-facing cameras without the need for dedicated front-facing sensors or an intrusive notch. Read on to find out how well this concept works and how the NEX Dual compares against other flagship smartphones.
Bron: Tech Advisor EN→NL Archive.org version
At its heart, the Vivo Nex Dual Display is a fairly silly phone. No-one really needs a second display on their phone, and as solutions to the notch problem go, it’s one of the more extreme - most people would probably be happier with a slider or a cut-out.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 22-03-2019
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Trusted Reviews EN→NL Archive.org version
An unusual concept executed well, but it’s still not enough to pull most away from more conventional designs.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 22-02-2019
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Pocket Lint EN→NL Archive.org version
Overall, the NEX Dual Display is the quirkiest phone solution that we've used for years. So let's celebrate its experimentalism and forward-thinking ideas - even if, right now, used in the context of the UK, it's not all there.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 05-02-2019
Bron: The Verge EN→NL Archive.org version
The Vivo Nex Dual Display Edition is a flagship device in the purest sense of the word. It’s an impressive phone for the $700 price, and it demonstrates beyond a doubt that Vivo is a world-class manufacturer capable of incredible engineering and exciting new ideas.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 28-01-2019
Beoordeling: Totale score: 75%
Bron: GSM Arena EN→NL Archive.org version
Of course, only vivo can really know the true purpose behind the NEX family and just why and how it came about. Seeing how the NEX S and its Dual Display sibling were in the design and development pipeline together and considering their major design differences, yet common end-goal of delivering an "all-screen" device, it seems fair to assume an experimental nature. One executed from a veritable position of power as part of the ranks of BBK electronics. Vivo isn't particularly known for playing in the flagship segment either. So the NEX is clearly something new and different.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 14-01-2019
Beoordeling: Totale score: 86%
Bron: NDTV Gadgets EN→NL Archive.org version
The Vivo Nex Dual Display is a very ambitious smartphone and is undoubtedly one of the most refined implementations of the dual-screen form factor. Admittedly, the second screen is of little use apart from selfies, but the phone on a whole looks like a solid all-rounder, and most importantly is unique and innovative.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 10-01-2019
Bron: Android Authority EN→NL Archive.org version
The Vivo NEX Dual Display edition isn’t the Vivo NEX 2 we were expecting, but it is a thoughtful and creative way to avoid the notch on a smartphone. With smart implementations like mirror mode and dual screen gaming, the second display is more than just a gimmick for me. While I don’t necessarily see this becoming a trend in 2019 devices, I’m glad to see companies like Vivo continuing to innovate and keeping smartphones fun.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 04-01-2019
Bron: Androidcommunity.com EN→NL Archive.org version
The Vivo phone’s software includes both face and fingerprint recognition for mobile security and authentication. The on-screen fingerprint scanner is more accurate and faster now.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 26-12-2018
Bron: Slashgear EN→NL Archive.org version
The Vivo NEX Dual Display Edition definitely feels like a preview of the future. Or at least one of the many possible futures that could run alongside foldable phones. Like the ZTE nubia X, it is, so far, one of the better implementations of dual screen phones we’ve seen so far. Unlike the nubia X, the Lunar Ring gives it a nice, futuristic touch.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 21-12-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Tech ARP EN→NL Archive.org version
The Vivo NEX Dual Display Edition is the industry-first dual-display smartphone with a triple rear camera setup. In addition to its dual-screen display, it has an astounding 10 GB of RAM!
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 20-12-2018
Bron: CNet EN→NL Archive.org version
Of course, there's no front-facing camera -- not even a pop-up one. But you won't really need it since the rear screen means the rear cameras can double up as a selfie camera.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 20-12-2018
Bron: GSM Arena EN→NL Archive.org version
The vivo NEX Dual Display Edition is already up for pre-order in China and it will ship on December 29. It's priced at CNY 4,998 ($720). More countries should get it starting next year.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 11-12-2018
Bron: Pocket Lint EN→NL Archive.org version
So is dual screen a fad or the future? The Vivo NEX Dual Display makes a strong impression as a flagship device. But there's the sense of over-engineering too: it's fingerprint on the front, face recognition on the rear, rather than a choice; only one side has Gorilla glass protection and you can throw the idea of a case out of the window too. That said, it's one impressive bit of over-engineering that gives our inner geek a warm glow.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 11-12-2018
Bron: Android Authority EN→NL Archive.org version
Despite all that, the new Vivo Nex seems like a really exciting device. It’s nice to see manufacturers innovating in the space, and we’ll likely see more dual-display phones in the near future.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 11-12-2018
Bron: Connect - 4/19
Enkel testrapport, , Zeer kort, Datum: 01-03-2019
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Chinahandys.net DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 13-02-2019
Beoordeling: Totale score: 3% prestatie: 70% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 90% afwerking: 100%
Bron: Andrea Galeazzi IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 14-02-2019
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prijs: 80% beeldscherm: 85% mobiliteit: 75% afwerking: 88%
Bron: Tutto Android IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 12-02-2019
Beoordeling: Totale score: 84% prijs: 95% functionaliteiten: 95% beeldscherm: 87% mobiliteit: 80% ergonomie: 64%
Bron: AndroidWorld.it IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 12-02-2019
Beoordeling: Totale score: 83% functionaliteiten: 85% beeldscherm: 90% afwerking: 85% ergonomie: 85%
Bron: AndroidWorld.it IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 12-02-2019
Beoordeling: Totale score: 83% functionaliteiten: 85% beeldscherm: 90% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 85% ergonomie: 85%
Bron: Frandroid FR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 12-01-2019
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prestatie: 80% beeldscherm: 90% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 80%
Bron: DGL.ru RU→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 04-03-2019
Bron: Hi-Tech Mail RU→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 06-02-2019
Beoordeling: Totale score: 76% prestatie: 90% beeldscherm: 70% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 90%
Bron: The Gioididong VN→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 25-01-2019
Bron: Zing VN→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 07-01-2019
Bron: Unlimited Tech →NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 07-02-2019
Beoordeling: Totale score: 85%
Commentaar
Qualcomm Adreno 630:
Geïntegreerde grafische kaart in de Qualcomm Snapdragon 845-SoC. Volgens Qualcomm 30% sneller dan de oude Adreno 540 in de Snapdragon 835 met 30% lager energieverbruik.
De meeste niet-veeleisende huidige games kunnen vloeiend draaien. Wees voorbereid op verminderde grafische weergave door lage detailinstellingen en lage resoluties. Toch verschaffen deze kaarten voldoende prestatie voor kantoor taken en video bekijken (niet voor HD videos).
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Grafische Kaarten en de passende Benchmark Tabel.
SD 845:
High-end SoC voor smartphones voorgesteld in het begin van 2018 en gefabriceerd in 10nm LPP-FinFET bij TSMC. Integreert 4x Kryo-385-cores (Cortex-A75) aan 2.8 GHz voor maximale performantie en 4x Kryo-385-cores aan 1.8 GHz voor maximale efficiëntie. Beschikt daarnaast over een X20 LTE-model, ac-WiFi en een dual-channel 32-Bit 1866-MHz LPDDR4x-geheugencontroller.
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Processors.
6.39": Er bestaan maar weinig smartphones met een groter scherm.
Grote schermformaten laten hogere resoluties toe. Details zoals letters zijn groter. Anderzijds is het energieverbruik lager bij kleine schermdiagonalen en de toestellen zijn kleiner, lichter en goedkoper.
>>Om de fijnheid van het scherm te vinden, kijk in onze DPI-lijst.
73.17%: Dit cijfer is slecht. De meeste notebooks hebben een hoger cijfer. Dit is niet aanbevolen bij aankoop.
>> De verdere informatie kan worden gevonden in onze hulp voor de aankoop van laptops.