Sony Xperia XA
Laptopspecificaties
Secundaire Camera: 8 MPix (Autofokus f/2.0, 1080p-Video @ 30 fps)
Price comparison
Gemiddelde van 39 score (van 65 beoordelingen)
Testrapporten voor de Sony Xperia XA
Golden times? With its Xperia XA, Sony sends a new designer piece into the smartphone mid-range ring. Esthetes in particular should notice the slim lateral display bezel and the plain build right away. But are the inner values enough to keep the rivals at a distance?
Bron: All About Phones Archive.org version
Eén van de nieuwe toestellen in Sony zijn nieuwe X-lijn is de Sony Xperia XA. Dit toestel is de goedkoopste variant van de toestellen in de X-lijn. Of de smartphone ook echt een goede koop is, dat vertellen we je in deze review.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 25-09-2016
Bron: Consumentenbond Archive.org version
De Sony Xperia XA is de goedkoopste variant in de nieuwe Xperia X-serie. Hij mag dan met zijn prijs behoren tot de middenmoot in de.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 06-07-2016
Anderstalige testrapporten
Bron: Techradar EN→NL Archive.org version
The Sony Xperia XA is slim and pocketable, but problems with performance and battery life mean there are better choices out there.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 28-08-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Tech Girl EN→NL Archive.org version
Yes, the Sony Xperia XA does everything it is supposed to. It has the things you need but you won’t want it. We’re in a boom of mid level phones. All the major names are dropping mid range smartphones monthly. This phone is already out of date and over priced compared to the likes of Xiaomi offering cheaper phones that are so incredibly impressive in what they offer. I always try to find one positive and when it comes to the XA, other than the display that spans across the screen that’s really about it. Its a pity because there was a time where I’d lament the Xperia range as one of the best but this is not what we’ve come to expect from Sony.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 04-05-2017
Bron: Techradar EN→NL Archive.org version
A cute little phone with a big battery life problem and no other chart-topping features to make you forget that, the Sony Xperia XA is ultimately disappointing.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 03-05-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Techradar EN→NL Archive.org version
The Sony Xperia XA is slim and pocketable, but problems with performance and battery life mean there are better choices out there.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 10-04-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: T Break EN→NL Archive.org version
I really wanted to like the Xperia XA, solely based on its looks. But once you look deeper you find a phone that while on the more affordable side of the spectrum, doesn’t offer up much in terms of performance. I’d much rather throw in a little bit more money and pick up one of Sony’s flagship phones, just so that I get better performance for what I’m paying for.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 28-08-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70% prijs: 70% prestatie: 65% functionaliteiten: 80% afwerking: 85%
Bron: Androidcommunity.com EN→NL Archive.org version
The Sony Xperia XA is an ‘OK’ phone that looks great but is simply priced too high for me to recommend it over the alternatives mentioned in this review. Listed at $249.99, it’s outperformed by devices checking in at least $50 cheaper that provide double the storage, a more robust design, and a longer list of features.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 22-08-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Unbox EN→NL Archive.org version
Our main pain point with Sony Xperia devices of the past has always been its price and with the Sony Xperia XA, you can really see how the Japanese brand tries to take the fight to the mid-ranged segment. It is a beautiful phone and the price is closer to other offerings in the market in the same range at Php 13,990. However, the dips in performance and other flaws are a little hard to ignore. A solid effort that dared to be different from previous Xperia smartphones, but it would pain us to fully recommend the XA without exploring other options.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 15-08-2016
Bron: G Style Magazine EN→NL Archive.org version
The Xperia XA is a really good budget phone. If you want to spend less than $300 and get a really good phone then I wouldn’t be mad at you if this phone was your choice. It has a lot going for it. Sturdy design, sleek, curved glass, bezel-less edges, great camera, lightweight. The XA also has some negatives. A screen only at 720p is a letdown, no remote play and shitty speakers. What do you really want for $279 dollars? Maybe you can get a little more from another phone. Maybe, but what that phone may do better than the XA it’ll be lacking in something else.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 12-08-2016
Bron: PC Mag EN→NL Archive.org version
For $280, the Sony Xperia XA just doesn't bring enough to the table to justify its price. Despite a high-quality build it suffers from sluggish performance, mediocre battery life, and a relatively low-resolution display. The Blu R1 HD gets you better performance and battery life for a fraction of the price.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 08-08-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 50%
Bron: Techradar EN→NL Archive.org version
A cute little phone with a big battery life problem and no other chart-topping features to make you forget that, the Sony Xperia XA is ultimately disappointing. There's now a lot of competition in this affordable mid-range area, and the Motorola Moto G4 really shows it up, with better performance in most areas and a much lower price.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 02-08-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Laptop Media EN→NL Archive.org version
Sony Xperia XA is one of the most stylish smartphones on the market, and this is due to its ultra thin side bezels. It also has a 5-inch HD display, and even though you can find such screens in phones that are 50% cheaper, we can’t say that it is a drawback because it offers a good image detail, colors and viewing angles. Nonetheless, if we compare it to Xperia X, you will certainly notice a difference in this respect. What’s more, the battery life on this device is quite poor, but the quick charging and power saving modes seem to compensate for this to a certain extent.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 30-07-2016
Bron: V3.co.uk EN→NL Archive.org version
We can say this: the XA comes off a lot better than the horribly disappointing Xperia X. Had Sony taken the best parts from each we might be in a different place today, but as it stands (and despite a few high points) the Xperia XA feels a little insignificant.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 25-07-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Trusted Reviews EN→NL Archive.org version
Unless you can get a particularly tasty offer, there are so many better options out there than the run-of-the-mill Sony Xperia XA. The screen is low-res, and the camera is slow and unreliable. Sony has kitted the XA out with only the minimum required spec in each area – something you simply cannot do any more.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 22-07-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60% prijs: 70% prestatie: 70% beeldscherm: 60% mobiliteit: 70% afwerking: 70%
Bron: It Pro EN→NL Archive.org version
The Sony Xperia XA is a surprisingly bad phone with short battery life, disappointing performance and a questionable appearance. It’s not completely without merit - it has a respectably responsive touchscreen and a competent camera, but that’s not enough to make the XA worth buying.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 15-07-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 40%
Bron: Expert Reviews EN→NL Archive.org version
Ultimately, the Xperia XA's mediocre screen and diabolical battery life just aren't good enough to recommend it. Had Sony mashed the Xperia X and Xperia XA together, marrying the XA's edge-to-edge screen design and camera sensor with the X's more accurate display, faster processor and longer-lasting battery, it might have created a great smartphone. On their own, though, they both have too many flaws to make them good value.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 12-07-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Phone Arena EN→NL Archive.org version
When you draw the line, the Sony Xperia XA appears to be nothing more than a good-looking affordable phone with little extraordinary above that. Apart from its looks and decent performance for most daily tasks, it’s really all downhill: the display has bluish, oversaturated colors and is not sharp enough, heavier tasks make the phone stutter, camera quality is uninspiring and battery life is below average. Lack of proper 4G LTE bands for the United States is also a downer.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 11-07-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 55%
Bron: PC Perspective EN→NL Archive.org version
In the end, you have to look at the opposition to set the Xperia XA in context, and right now it’s just too strong for this handset to stand out in any meaningful way. The Motorola Moto G4, king of the budget smartphones, is slicker, longer-lasting and costs much less. The OnePlus 2 is only £10 more expensive and is a much faster, more competent smartphone. By all means take your pick, but don't choose the Sony Xperia XA.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 01-07-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Recombu EN→NL Archive.org version
The Xperia XA is a cheap but not-so-cheerful cousin to the Xperia X, and while the gorgeous design promises a slick and affordable smartphone, the Xperia XA sadly loses out to similarly-priced rivals. It can certainly beat them for looks, but when it comes to smarts, as well as longevity, we would rather get our hands on the Moto G4 Plus instead.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 29-06-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: GSM Arena EN→NL Archive.org version
Of Sony's 2016 offerings, the Xperia XA is the one that managed to get under our skin. It reminds us of the Xperia T, which sold us on a curved back, solely on the basis of aesthetics and ergonomics. The Xperia P too, which tried to prove that metal phones do belong in the midrange (back in 2012, long before it became commonplace). The XA is the narrowest phone with a 5" screen and even without calipers you can feel it when you handle the phone. Its proportions - width, thickness, weight - are just right and we're especially fond of the way the front and back neatly curve into the sides. This is the phone that makes all others feel chunky.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 22-06-2016
Bron: Android Mag DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 31-12-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prijs: 88% prestatie: 60% functionaliteiten: 60% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 40% afwerking: 100% ergonomie: 100%
Bron: Chip.de DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 30-08-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 74% prijs: 83% prestatie: 86% functionaliteiten: 56% beeldscherm: 89% mobiliteit: 66%
Bron: Area DVD DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 22-08-2016
Bron: eTest DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 17-08-2016
Bron: WinFuture DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 03-08-2016
Bron: PC Welt DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 26-07-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 88% prestatie: 91% functionaliteiten: 94% beeldscherm: 87% mobiliteit: 80%
Bron: Verivox DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 25-07-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 64% functionaliteiten: 65%
Bron: A1 Blog DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 21-07-2016
Bron: WinFuture DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 21-07-2016
Bron: WinFuture DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 17-07-2016
Bron: Computerbild - Heft 15/2016
Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 15-07-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 85%
Bron: Teltarif DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 10-07-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 88% functionaliteiten: 80% afwerking: 92% ergonomie: 80%
Bron: Inside Handy DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 07-07-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Blick DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 07-07-2016
Bron: Basic Tutorials - Heft 8/2016
Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 01-07-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 68%
Bron: Connect - Heft 8/2016
Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 01-07-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 100%
Bron: e-media - Heft 08/2016
Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 01-07-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Android Pit DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 01-07-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 50%
Bron: Android Mag DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 01-07-2016
Bron: Connect - Heft 08/2016
Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 01-07-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 82%
Bron: Curved DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 20-06-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 74% prestatie: 73% beeldscherm: 68% mobiliteit: 68%
Bron: n-tv DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 16-06-2016
Bron: Android Magazin - Heft 3/2016
Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 01-05-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: FAQsAndroid ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 13-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70% prijs: 60% beeldscherm: 75% mobiliteit: 55% afwerking: 85%
Bron: Computerhoy ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 04-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 75%
Bron: Zona Movilidad ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 27-08-2016
Bron: Andro 4 All ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 17-07-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 82%
Bron: Android Geek PT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 14-09-2016
Bron: Canaltech PT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 22-08-2016
Bron: 4G News PT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 19-08-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 73% prijs: 65% prestatie: 75% beeldscherm: 60% mobiliteit: 65% afwerking: 85%
Bron: Tech Different IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 24-10-2016
Bron: Key for web IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 17-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: AndroidPit.it IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 28-07-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 50%
Bron: Esperienza Mobile IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 11-07-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 65% prijs: 60% prestatie: 65% beeldscherm: 60% mobiliteit: 60% afwerking: 75%
Bron: Top for Phone FR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 15-10-2016
Bron: CNet France FR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 05-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: One Tech PL→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 05-09-2016
Bron: Komputerswiat PL→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 30-08-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 76% functionaliteiten: 74%
Bron: Log.com.tr TR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 12-08-2016
Bron: Mobileimho.ru RU→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 20-08-2016
Bron: The Gioididong VN→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 23-02-2017
Bron: Techbox SK→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 19-08-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 82%
Bron: Fony.sk SK→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 16-08-2016
Commentaar
ARM Mali-T860 MP2:
Alleen oudere games kunnen vloeiend draaien met deze grafische chips (als ze niet veeleisend zijn). Gedeeld geheugen grafische cores in deze categorie hebben het voordeel van minder warmte-ontwikkeling en langere batterijlooptijd. Voor kantoor, internet, beeldcorrectie- en videomonteringswerk zijn deze grafische chips nog steeds bruikbaar zonder enige beperkingen.
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Grafische Kaarten en de passende Benchmark Tabel.
Helio P10 MT6755:
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Processors.
5.00": Dit is een typische schermdiagonaal voor smartphones.
>>Om de fijnheid van het scherm te vinden, kijk in onze DPI-lijst.
Sony: Sony Corporation is een van de grootste Japanse elektronicabedrijven. Het bedrijf werd in 1946 opgericht onder een andere naam en produceerde aanvankelijk rijstkokers. Het bedrijf lanceerde de eerste transistorradio. In 1958 werd het bedrijf omgedoopt tot Sony. Sony is een combinatie van het Latijnse woord sonus (geluid) en het Engelse woord sonny (kleine jongen). Tegenwoordig is de core business consumentenelektronica. Het bedrijf houdt zich bezig met de ontwikkeling, het ontwerp, de fabricage en de verkoop van elektronische apparatuur, instrumenten, apparaten, gameconsoles en software. Sony is actief in de volgende segmenten: gaming- en netwerkdiensten, muziek, afbeeldingen, home entertainment en geluid, beeldproducten en -oplossingen, mobiele communicatie, halfgeleiders, financiële diensten en andere.
69.02%: Dit cijfer is slecht. De meeste notebooks hebben een hoger cijfer. Dit is niet aanbevolen bij aankoop.
>> De verdere informatie kan worden gevonden in onze hulp voor de aankoop van laptops.