Samsung Galaxy J5 Serie
Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Samsung Exynos 7870 OctaGrafische Kaart: ARM Mali-T830 MP1, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, Qualcomm Adreno 306
Beeldscherm: 5.20 inch
Gewicht: 0.158kg, 0.159kg, 0.16kg
Prijs: 279 euro
Gemiddelde van 65 score (van 105 beoordelingen)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
Laptopspecificaties
Notebook: Samsung Galaxy J5 2016Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
Grafische Kaart: Qualcomm Adreno 306
Beeldscherm: 5.20 inch, 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixels
Gewicht: 0.159kg
Prijs: 279 euro
Links: Samsung laptopsectie
Price comparison
Gemiddelde Score:
Testrapporten
Metalhead. Eerst kunststof, nu metaal: de nieuwe versie van de Galaxy J5 streeft naar een hoge kwaliteit uitstraling. Echter, de interne componenten zijn grotendeels hetzelfde gebleven. Is dit voldoende voor een succesvolle update?
Bron: All About Phones Archive.org version
Mijn conclusie over de J5 2016 is louter positief, al kan ik niet ontkennen dat je (veel) betere smartphones kunt kopen voor minder geld. Maar deze smartphones zijn dan ook eerder ‘uitzonderingen’. Algemeen gezien behoort de J5 2016 nog altijd tot de top van het midrange /low-end segment.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 17-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: All About Phones Archive.org version
Mijn conclusie over de J5 2016 is louter positief, al kan ik niet ontkennen dat je (veel) betere smartphones kunt kopen voor minder geld. Maar deze smartphones zijn dan ook eerder ‘uitzonderingen’. Algemeen gezien behoort de J5 2016 nog altijd tot de top van het midrange /low-end segment.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 17-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Anderstalige testrapporten
Bron: It Pro EN→NL Archive.org version
The third-gen Moto G just retains its place in our budget smartphone affections thanks to its classier looks and build quality as well as its clean version of Android and waterproofing. Even so, the J5 has a lot going for it and is a very good alternative if you want a better looking screen and a replaceable battery.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 16-07-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: It Pro EN→NL Archive.org version
The third-gen Moto G just retains its place in our budget smartphone affections thanks to its classier looks and build quality as well as its clean version of Android and waterproofing. Even so, the J5 has a lot going for it and is a very good alternative if you want a better looking screen and a replaceable battery.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 16-07-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: It Pro EN→NL Archive.org version
The Moto G series has been the gold standard in budget smartphones, but the Samsung Galaxy J5 is a great alternative thanks to its superlative screen and long lasting battery. It's an excellent choice for anyone who's looking for quality on a budget. Having said all that, it’s worth waiting for the new 2016 Moto G4 (the fourth generation Moto G) which is due any day now. Unless you need a cheap phone right away, it’s worth waiting to see if the now Lenovo-owned Motorola can continue its success streak.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 20-03-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: It Pro EN→NL Archive.org version
The Moto G series has been the gold standard in budget smartphones, but the Samsung Galaxy J5 is a great alternative thanks to its superlative screen and long lasting battery. It's an excellent choice for anyone who's looking for quality on a budget. Having said all that, it’s worth waiting for the new 2016 Moto G4 (the fourth generation Moto G) which is due any day now. Unless you need a cheap phone right away, it’s worth waiting to see if the now Lenovo-owned Motorola can continue its success streak.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 20-03-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: It Pro EN→NL Archive.org version
The third-gen Moto G just retains its place in our budget smartphone affections thanks to its classier looks and build quality as well as its clean version of Android and waterproofing. Even so, the J5 has a lot going for it and is a very good alternative if you want a better looking screen and a replaceable battery.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 19-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: It Pro EN→NL Archive.org version
The third-gen Moto G just retains its place in our budget smartphone affections thanks to its classier looks and build quality as well as its clean version of Android and waterproofing. Even so, the J5 has a lot going for it and is a very good alternative if you want a better looking screen and a replaceable battery.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 19-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Expert Reviews EN→NL Archive.org version
Despite this, it’s clear that the Motorola Moto G4 is the phone to beat in the budget smartphone space right now. But that’s not to say there are no reasons to choose the Samsung Galaxy J5. It remains a good option if you value screen quality and battery life above all else. You might prefer it if you're switching across from another Samsung handset and don't fancy changing to a different manufacturer. And you might prefer a smaller handset; the Samsung Galaxy J5 is more compact, more easily usable in one hand and easier to slip into a pocket. Despite the emergence of the Moto G4, then, it hangs on to its Recommended award.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 07-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 100%
Bron: Expert Reviews EN→NL Archive.org version
Despite this, it’s clear that the Motorola Moto G4 is the phone to beat in the budget smartphone space right now. But that’s not to say there are no reasons to choose the Samsung Galaxy J5. It remains a good option if you value screen quality and battery life above all else. You might prefer it if you're switching across from another Samsung handset and don't fancy changing to a different manufacturer. And you might prefer a smaller handset; the Samsung Galaxy J5 is more compact, more easily usable in one hand and easier to slip into a pocket. Despite the emergence of the Moto G4, then, it hangs on to its Recommended award.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 07-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 100%
Bron: Tech Nave EN→NL Archive.org version
We are living in a world where sub-RM1000 smartphones are coming out with features taken from flagships that were around scantly a couple of years ago. This scenario has created phones such as the Honor 5X, Vivo X3, Xiaomi Redmi Note 3, Alcatel Flash Plus 2 and so on. Samsung has a tough road ahead to go against the pack with the Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016), but we think they can do it - while breaking some sweat, especially for Samsung fans looking for an affordable metal frame Samsung phone.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 11-09-2016
Bron: Tech Nave EN→NL Archive.org version
We are living in a world where sub-RM1000 smartphones are coming out with features taken from flagships that were around scantly a couple of years ago. This scenario has created phones such as the Honor 5X, Vivo X3, Xiaomi Redmi Note 3, Alcatel Flash Plus 2 and so on. Samsung has a tough road ahead to go against the pack with the Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016), but we think they can do it - while breaking some sweat, especially for Samsung fans looking for an affordable metal frame Samsung phone.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 11-09-2016
Bron: Yugatech EN→NL Archive.org version
As we wrap up the review, we can say that the Galaxy J5 (2016) is a well-built phone with decent specs. Although, a usual concern for most thrifty consumers is the pricing of the device. For something this underpowered yet encased in an above average body and topped with a vibrant display, the brand is asking for Php11,990. The official pricing may have put a frown on some but rest assured, it’s a pretty good handset with nifty features crafted for everyday use.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 23-08-2016
Bron: Yugatech EN→NL Archive.org version
As we wrap up the review, we can say that the Galaxy J5 (2016) is a well-built phone with decent specs. Although, a usual concern for most thrifty consumers is the pricing of the device. For something this underpowered yet encased in an above average body and topped with a vibrant display, the brand is asking for Php11,990. The official pricing may have put a frown on some but rest assured, it’s a pretty good handset with nifty features crafted for everyday use.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 23-08-2016
Bron: KL Gadget Guy EN→NL Archive.org version
Make no mistake, with an asking price of RM799 for the J5 and RM999 for the J7, you're pretty much paying a premium for the Samsung brand instead of actual performance. If you're one of those people that wouldn't be caught dead with a phone that isn't from a well recognized international brand, the J5 and J7 can be considered. However, if the Samsung name doesn't mean all that much to you, then you should probably opt for one of the many entry/mid-level smartphones that come from brands located in mainland China.
Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 22-08-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 73% prijs: 80% prestatie: 75% functionaliteiten: 75% mobiliteit: 75% afwerking: 80%
Bron: KL Gadget Guy EN→NL Archive.org version
Make no mistake, with an asking price of RM799 for the J5 and RM999 for the J7, you're pretty much paying a premium for the Samsung brand instead of actual performance. If you're one of those people that wouldn't be caught dead with a phone that isn't from a well recognized international brand, the J5 and J7 can be considered. However, if the Samsung name doesn't mean all that much to you, then you should probably opt for one of the many entry/mid-level smartphones that come from brands located in mainland China.
Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 22-08-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 73% prijs: 80% prestatie: 75% functionaliteiten: 75% mobiliteit: 75% afwerking: 80%
Bron: It Pro EN→NL Archive.org version
The third-gen Moto G just retains its place in our budget smartphone affections thanks to its classier looks and build quality as well as its clean version of Android and waterproofing. Even so, the J5 has a lot going for it and is a very good alternative if you want a better looking screen and a replaceable battery.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 15-08-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: It Pro EN→NL Archive.org version
The third-gen Moto G just retains its place in our budget smartphone affections thanks to its classier looks and build quality as well as its clean version of Android and waterproofing. Even so, the J5 has a lot going for it and is a very good alternative if you want a better looking screen and a replaceable battery.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 15-08-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Laptop Media EN→NL Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy J lineup proved yet again that affordability and reliability can coexist successfully. After Galaxy J7 and Galaxy J3 performed very well in our reviews, Galaxy J5 (2016) did not let us down, either. On the contrary, it has great features for the asking price. This is a model with nice design, thin profile and metal frame. It offers a 5.2-inch Super AMOLED HD display which is a very good choice both in terms of size and of image quality.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 04-07-2016
Bron: Laptop Media EN→NL Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy J lineup proved yet again that affordability and reliability can coexist successfully. After Galaxy J7 and Galaxy J3 performed very well in our reviews, Galaxy J5 (2016) did not let us down, either. On the contrary, it has great features for the asking price. This is a model with nice design, thin profile and metal frame. It offers a 5.2-inch Super AMOLED HD display which is a very good choice both in terms of size and of image quality.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 04-07-2016
Bron: Phone Arena EN→NL Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) is a smartphone of reasonably good quality. It looks elegant and its screen is fairly pleasant. Its software experience is well-accomplished and its camera can land surprisingly good shots. While the Galaxy J5 (2016) does cover the essentials, it does so with the absolute minimum amount of design flair and hardware power required. Priced at around $255 in Asia and €280 in Europe, it becomes easy prey for comparably priced alternatives that present better value for money.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 20-06-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Phone Arena EN→NL Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) is a smartphone of reasonably good quality. It looks elegant and its screen is fairly pleasant. Its software experience is well-accomplished and its camera can land surprisingly good shots. While the Galaxy J5 (2016) does cover the essentials, it does so with the absolute minimum amount of design flair and hardware power required. Priced at around $255 in Asia and €280 in Europe, it becomes easy prey for comparably priced alternatives that present better value for money.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 20-06-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: It Pro EN→NL Archive.org version
The third-gen Moto G just retains its place in our budget smartphone affections thanks to its classier looks and build quality as well as its clean version of Android and waterproofing. Even so, the J5 has a lot going for it and is a very good alternative if you want a better looking screen and a replaceable battery.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 03-06-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: It Pro EN→NL Archive.org version
The third-gen Moto G just retains its place in our budget smartphone affections thanks to its classier looks and build quality as well as its clean version of Android and waterproofing. Even so, the J5 has a lot going for it and is a very good alternative if you want a better looking screen and a replaceable battery.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 03-06-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Think Digit EN→NL Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) is not the smartphone you should buy. It is quite underpowered compared to other offerings in the market, doesn't have a fingerprint sensor, and its pros don't outweigh the cons. The compromise isn't worth Samsung's brand value.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 30-05-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 59%
Bron: Think Digit EN→NL Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) is not the smartphone you should buy. It is quite underpowered compared to other offerings in the market, doesn't have a fingerprint sensor, and its pros don't outweigh the cons. The compromise isn't worth Samsung's brand value.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 30-05-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 59%
Bron: GSM Arena EN→NL Archive.org version
As far as the design is concerned the Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) lays a solid foundation for the company's upcoming mid-range smartphones. There'll be few people to complain as the phone looks better than its price tag suggests and is rocking top-notch build quality. However, in terms of hardware the Galaxy J5 (2016) feels like a pretty minor update. The bigger screen and battery are always a good way to lure customers in, but the chipset is feeling decidedly dated at this point. And the camera certainly can't live up to the promises that its specs make.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 25-05-2016
Bron: GSM Arena EN→NL Archive.org version
As far as the design is concerned the Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) lays a solid foundation for the company's upcoming mid-range smartphones. There'll be few people to complain as the phone looks better than its price tag suggests and is rocking top-notch build quality. However, in terms of hardware the Galaxy J5 (2016) feels like a pretty minor update. The bigger screen and battery are always a good way to lure customers in, but the chipset is feeling decidedly dated at this point. And the camera certainly can't live up to the promises that its specs make.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 25-05-2016
Bron: Recombu EN→NL Archive.org version
At this price, the Galaxy J5 is a very strong rival for the Moto G and other cut-price handsets. It's a solid all-rounder, offering dependable performance and excellent battery life as well as some brilliant camera tech. We prefer the vanilla Android Marshmallow experience of the Moto G, but Sammy fans will love what the Galaxy J5 has to offer.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 16-05-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90%
Bron: Recombu EN→NL Archive.org version
At this price, the Galaxy J5 is a very strong rival for the Moto G and other cut-price handsets. It's a solid all-rounder, offering dependable performance and excellent battery life as well as some brilliant camera tech. We prefer the vanilla Android Marshmallow experience of the Moto G, but Sammy fans will love what the Galaxy J5 has to offer.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 16-05-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90%
Bron: PC Pro EN→NL Archive.org version
It’s a shame to end on the slight downer of the camera because it’s the only area where the Samsung Galaxy J5 puts a foot wrong as far as I’m concerned. Usually, when I’ve reviewed a budget handset, I’m extremely eager to get back to my own phone, but in this instance, I’ll actually be a little sad to see the back of the J5. It’s smooth, stylish, and performs nicely with a bright screen and an incredible battery life. On one such day when I barely used the phone, it lost just 3% of its life from sitting in standby.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 29-04-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 100%
Bron: PC Pro EN→NL Archive.org version
It’s a shame to end on the slight downer of the camera because it’s the only area where the Samsung Galaxy J5 puts a foot wrong as far as I’m concerned. Usually, when I’ve reviewed a budget handset, I’m extremely eager to get back to my own phone, but in this instance, I’ll actually be a little sad to see the back of the J5. It’s smooth, stylish, and performs nicely with a bright screen and an incredible battery life. On one such day when I barely used the phone, it lost just 3% of its life from sitting in standby.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 29-04-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 100%
Bron: Computerbild - 2/2017
Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 15-01-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 86%
Bron: Computerbild - 2/2017
Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 15-01-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 86%
Bron: Netzwelt DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 12-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 78% functionaliteiten: 60% mobiliteit: 90% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Netzwelt DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 12-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 78% functionaliteiten: 60% mobiliteit: 90% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Computerhoy ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 19-12-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 71% prijs: 60% functionaliteiten: 60% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 90% afwerking: 70%
Bron: Computerhoy ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 19-12-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 71% prijs: 60% functionaliteiten: 60% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 90% afwerking: 70%
Bron: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 22-11-2016
Bron: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 22-11-2016
Bron: Descargar.mobi ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 15-02-2016
Bron: Descargar.mobi ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 15-02-2016
Bron: CNet France FR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 14-10-2016
Bron: CNet France FR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 14-10-2016
Bron: Komputerswiat PL→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 04-02-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 75% functionaliteiten: 73%
Bron: Komputerswiat PL→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 04-02-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 75% functionaliteiten: 73%
Bron: Teleguru PL→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 06-12-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 67% prestatie: 80% beeldscherm: 70% mobiliteit: 60% afwerking: 50%
Bron: Teleguru PL→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 06-12-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 67% prestatie: 80% beeldscherm: 70% mobiliteit: 60% afwerking: 50%
Bron: Komputerswiat PL→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 17-08-2016
Bron: Komputerswiat PL→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 17-08-2016
Bron: Tekno Seyir TR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 16-03-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Tekno Seyir TR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 16-03-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: VNReview VN→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 22-08-2016
Bron: VNReview VN→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 22-08-2016
Bron: Jagat Review ID→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 15-09-2016
Bron: Jagat Review ID→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 15-09-2016
Bron: Moj Android SK→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 30-08-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 92% prestatie: 81% beeldscherm: 82% mobiliteit: 92% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Moj Android SK→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 30-08-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 92% prestatie: 81% beeldscherm: 82% mobiliteit: 92% afwerking: 80%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
Laptopspecificaties
Notebook: Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) DuosProcessor: Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa
Grafische Kaart: ARM Mali-T830 MP1
Beeldscherm: 5.20 inch, 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixels
Gewicht: 0.158kg
Prijs: 279 euro
Links: Samsung laptopsectie
Price comparison
Gemiddelde Score:
Testrapporten
All good things... With the update of its attractive Galaxy J series, we have the third generation of the J5 in our test. Samsung has radically changed the design and otherwise performs meaningful fine tuning. Fans of removable batteries will be disappointed, since the battery is now also built into the J5. Update: OTA update with bug fixes released.
Anderstalige testrapporten
Bron: Netzwelt DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 11-04-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 72% functionaliteiten: 50% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 90%
Bron: Teleguru PL→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 24-02-2018
Bron: Tabletowo PL→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 30-08-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 85% prestatie: 80% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 90% afwerking: 90%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2017
Laptopspecificaties
Notebook: Samsung Galaxy J5 2017Processor: Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa
Grafische Kaart: ARM Mali-T830 MP2
Beeldscherm: 5.20 inch, 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixels
Gewicht: 0.16kg
Links: Samsung laptopsectie
Price comparison
Gemiddelde Score:
Testrapporten
Bron: All About Phones Archive.org version
Natuurlijk is de smartphone niet perfect en zijn er wel een aantal puntjes op aan te merken. Vooral de relatief trage processor en lage schermresolutie zijn jammer. Maar als je een niet al te intensieve gebruiker bent zal dat geen groot probleem zijn. Dat terwijl de goede batterij, het prettige ontwerp en de handige extraatjes in de software wél een echt voordeel zijn.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 13-10-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Consumentenbond Archive.org version
Voor €280 krijg je een smartphone die voor veel mensen zal volstaan. De telefoon werkt vrij snel en heeft op het eerste gezicht een aardige camera, een vingerafdrukscanner en een helder scherm. Helaas is de resolutie van dat scherm niet zo hoog en heeft het toestel niet heel veel opslagruimte. Bovendien staat de Galaxy J5 (2017) niet op Samsungs lijst van smartphones die maandelijks updates ontvangen.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 29-06-2017
Anderstalige testrapporten
Bron: Know Your Mobile EN→NL Archive.org version
Really quite an impressive low-cost smartphone with a lot of bang for your buck. Arguably one of the best budget handsets on the market thanks to Samsung's mastery of Super AMOLED display technology and some sterling battery performance, both of which put it ahead of rivals such as the Moto G, while in other areas it's quite comparable with that very capable handset. The trade-off, however, is that the Moto G does get stock Android and timely updates, while Samsung's Galaxy J5 has TouchWiz on-top and requires a bit of extra fettling between software versions.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 10-05-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: It Pro EN→NL Archive.org version
The third-gen Moto G just retains its place in our budget smartphone affections thanks to its classier looks and build quality as well as its clean version of Android and waterproofing. Even so, the J5 has a lot going for it and is a very good alternative if you want a better looking screen and a replaceable battery.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 07-05-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Know Your Mobile EN→NL Archive.org version
Best in class of the budget Android category; you will struggle to find battery and display performance this good anywhere else at this price.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 25-04-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: It Pro EN→NL Archive.org version
The Moto G series has been the gold standard in budget smartphones, but the Samsung Galaxy J5 is a great alternative thanks to its superlative screen and long lasting battery. It's an excellent choice for anyone who's looking for quality on a budget. Having said all that, it’s worth waiting for the new 2016 Moto G4 (the fourth generation Moto G) which is due any day now. Unless you need a cheap phone right away, it’s worth waiting to see if the now Lenovo-owned Motorola can continue its success streak.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 22-12-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Toptenreviews EN→NL Archive.org version
With better performance and a longer battery life, Samsung’s updated Galaxy J5 is a low-cost marvel android 7.0 smartphone.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 15-10-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Laptop Media EN→NL Archive.org version
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) brings many improvements compared to its successful predecessor and this makes it more than accomplished model. First of all, the device comes with an entirely metal design which is not always seen in this price range. There is a fingerprint sensor built in the hardware Home button. It is quite surprising that we don’t find a USB Type-C port but this is a drawback which can be ignored.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 22-08-2017
Bron: It Pro EN→NL Archive.org version
The Moto G series has been the gold standard in budget smartphones, but the Samsung Galaxy J5 is a great alternative thanks to its superlative screen and long lasting battery. It's an excellent choice for anyone who's looking for quality on a budget. Having said all that, it’s worth waiting for the new 2016 Moto G4 (the fourth generation Moto G) which is due any day now. Unless you need a cheap phone right away, it’s worth waiting to see if the now Lenovo-owned Motorola can continue its success streak.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 17-08-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: GSM Arena EN→NL Archive.org version
Samsung's alphabet soup is making less and less sense. Here we have the Galaxy J5 (2017) that's got a premium metal build, a frugal 14nm chipset, an excellent Super AMOLED display, and Samsung's latest software. How is that lower midrange?
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 04-08-2017
Bron: Phone World EN→NL Archive.org version
Samsung Galaxy J5 Pro has 4G supported device with some mid-range features. The device is especially for Samsung lovers because other device lovers will have some issue with its price which is a little bit expensive compared to other smartphones.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 02-08-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 66% prijs: 70% prestatie: 60% beeldscherm: 70% mobiliteit: 60% afwerking: 70%
Bron: Phone Arena EN→NL Archive.org version
It has one of the best interfaces around: sleek and modern-looking, it has Samsung’s excellent apps, and it has a very solid battery life. But its camera and, most importantly, performance are underwhelming. The phone often feels stuttery and the camera lacks in detail and speed. And we know the terrible state of Android updates for phones like the J5 (2017). In such a fiercely competitive market, the J5 (2017) does too little to stand out.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 18-07-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 65%
Bron: Android Pit DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 19-11-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Android Mag DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 17-08-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 91% prijs: 92%
Bron: Curved DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 27-07-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prestatie: 74% beeldscherm: 82% mobiliteit: 82%
Bron: Inside Handy DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 20-07-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 76%
Bron: Blick DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 14-07-2017
Bron: Zona Movilidad ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 08-03-2018
Bron: Media Trends ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 10-10-2017
Bron: Computerhoy ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 10-09-2017
Beoordeling: prijs: 80% functionaliteiten: 60% beeldscherm: 70% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 10-06-2017
Bron: PC Guia PT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 09-01-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Android Geek PT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 09-09-2017
Bron: Pplware PT→NL Archive.org version
Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 10-08-2017
Bron: 4G News PT→NL Archive.org version
Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 09-08-2017
Bron: AndroidPit.it IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 25-10-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Smartphone e tablet android IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 01-08-2017
Beoordeling: prestatie: 70% beeldscherm: 70% mobiliteit: 70% afwerking: 70%
Bron: Andrea Galeazzi IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 18-07-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 75% prijs: 70% beeldscherm: 75% mobiliteit: 85% afwerking: 80%
Bron: AndroidWorld.it IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 10-07-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 77% prijs: 60% functionaliteiten: 75% beeldscherm: 85% mobiliteit: 80% ergonomie: 85%
Bron: Tutto Android IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 08-07-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 75% prijs: 69% functionaliteiten: 68% beeldscherm: 78% mobiliteit: 82% ergonomie: 85%
Bron: AndroidPit.fr FR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 30-10-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Les Mobiles FR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 18-09-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 86%
Bron: 01Net FR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 01-08-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 82% prestatie: 60% mobiliteit: 100%
Bron: Top for Phone FR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 19-07-2017
Bron: CNet France FR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 18-07-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Antyweb PL→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 12-10-2017
Bron: Yamobi RU→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 31-07-2017
Bron: CZC CZ→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 20-08-2017
Bron: The Gioididong VN→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 24-07-2017
Bron: The Gioididong VN→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 23-06-2017
Bron: Smartphone.bg BU→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 14-08-2017
Bron: Smartphone.bg BU→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 17-07-2017
Bron: Smartphone.bg BU→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 04-07-2017
Bron: Tek.no NO→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 01-08-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 75%
Commentaar
Samsung: Samsung Group is het grootste Zuid-Koreaanse conglomeraat en werd opgericht in 1938. Samsung Group had in 2014 489.000 mensen in dienst en is een van 's werelds grootste bedrijven in termen van omzet en marktsterkte. De naam Samsung betekent "Drie Sterren" in het Koreaans en staat voor de drie zonen van de oprichter van het bedrijf. Het bedrijf werd in 1938 opgericht als kruidenierswinkel. Met haar dochteronderneming Samsung Electronics, opgericht in 1969, begon Samsung met de productie van elektrotechnische artikelen, met de focus op consumentenelektronica en huishoudelijke apparaten in een vroeg stadium. Andere branches waarin het grote concern actief is, zijn onder meer machinebouw, auto's (Hyundai), verzekeringen, groothandel, onroerend goed en vrije tijd. Samsung produceert een breed scala aan elektronische producten, waaronder smartphones, televisies, huishoudelijke apparaten en halfgeleiders. De Galaxy-smartphonelijn van het bedrijf is een van de meest populaire ter wereld. Samsung is ook een belangrijke speler in de halfgeleiderindustrie en maakt geheugenchips en processors voor veel andere elektronicafabrikanten.
Deze grafische kaarten voor notebooks zijn niet bruikbaar voor games. Als ze al games kunnen draaien, dan doen ze dat met grafische afwijkingen en heel lage framesnelheid. Voor gamers zijn deze chips ongeschikt! Kantoor en internet taken zijn, daarentegen, geen probleem voor deze GPUs.
Qualcomm Adreno 306:
ARM Mali-T830 MP1:
Alleen oudere games kunnen vloeiend draaien met deze grafische chips (als ze niet veeleisend zijn). Gedeeld geheugen grafische cores in deze categorie hebben het voordeel van minder warmte-ontwikkeling en langere batterijlooptijd. Voor kantoor, internet, beeldcorrectie- en videomonteringswerk zijn deze grafische chips nog steeds bruikbaar zonder enige beperkingen.
ARM Mali-T830 MP2:
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Grafische Kaarten en de passende Benchmark Tabel.
Qualcomm Snapdragon:
Samsung Exynos:
7870 Octa:
Exynos 7-SoC met acht Cortex-A53-cores geklokt aan maximaal 1.6 GHz en gefabriceerd in een 14-nm-proces. Beschikt over een ARM Mali T830-MP2-GPU en een dual-channel-geheugencontroller (LPDDR3-1866).
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Processors.
>>Om de fijnheid van het scherm te vinden, kijk in onze DPI-lijst.
No weight comment found (one expected)!
78.81%: Dit cijfer is niet echt overtuigend. Het moet in acht worden genomen dat er bijna geen laptops zijn die een score onder de 60% hebben. Dit notebook is beneden gemiddeld beoordeeld, en is niet aanbevolen te kopen.
>> De verdere informatie kan worden gevonden in onze hulp voor de aankoop van laptops.