Oppo R9s
Laptopspecificaties
Price comparison
Gemiddelde van 5 score (van 17 beoordelingen)
Testrapporten voor de Oppo R9s
Bron: Ausdroid EN→NL Archive.org version
We’ve gone pretty hard on the phones on the software side, but the reality is that they’re affordable, high quality alternatives to the top-tier phones from the big manufacturers. Color OS simply isn’t to our tastes at all – It makes Oppo’s amazing hardware feel just the little bit more pedestrian and uninspired, and it made it a tough sell to stick with the phones for longer than the review period when our usual day-to-day phones feature a more Android-like UI. There’s an increasing number of Aussies out there buying Oppo’s phones though, and it makes us feel that our criticism of Color OS is perhaps a bit off-base for general consumers.
Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 02-05-2017
Bron: Hardware Zone EN→NL Archive.org version
In a nutshell, the Oppo R9s and Oppo R9s Plus are reasonably decent phones - all the expected functionality for its price point, good design (albeit it looks very familiar) and has an acceptable set of cameras for normal photography and high resolution selfies. However in these days, a decent phone for a reasonable price may not be adequate and Oppo needs to be concerned about competition.
Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 30-04-2017
Bron: Android Authority EN→NL Archive.org version
The OPPO R9s has an excellent camera, offers impressive battery life, and features a nice display. However, the number of compromises here is staggering. Among derivative design and software, the R9s has sloppy software, offers below average performance, and has a bleak software support outlook. For Western users, the strange display coating, YouTube audio sync issue, and limited availability are even bigger issues to consider.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 15-03-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 82% prestatie: 80% beeldscherm: 75% mobiliteit: 90% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Cybershack EN→NL Archive.org version
Selling for AUD$598 with 64GB of storage, the OPPO R9s is a great deal, but it’s slightly difficult to recommend over the significantly cheaper F1s if you don’t need the extra bells and whistles, such as the better camera or the horsepower. Vanilla Android would push this phone over the edge and make it an easily recommendable device over its competitors, but as it stands you’ll have to weigh up whether you can deal with the slightly odd operating system. If the operating system isn’t a problem, then you’re getting one of the best value-for-money phones on the market.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 24-02-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Bill Bennett EN→NL Archive.org version
Oppo’s R9s story is all about the price. We don’t know for sure but if it lands in New Zealand at NZ$750 it’ll be competitive. For that money you get most of what you’ll find in premium phones selling for twice the price.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 15-02-2017
Bron: Gadgetguy EN→NL Archive.org version
So, great value for money and general performance ranging from very good to excellent. Oppo is on a winner with the R9s phone.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 01-02-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90% prijs: 100% prestatie: 90%
Bron: Tech Nave EN→NL Archive.org version
Comparing it with the F1s, both phones share a lot of similarities and one might even opt for the F1s for being cheaper at RM1198, whereas the R9S stands at RM1798. That’s a RM600 difference and it’s easily understood why some customers won’t go for the R9S. However, the R9S is a lot better in terms of picture quality, and the performance is better with a Snapdragon 625 processor. Let’s not forget the awesome battery recharge technology as well. Despite these good points, we still wished OPPO could have been more creative in their design department for it. Seriously, guys.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 26-01-2017
Bron: Lowyat.net EN→NL Archive.org version
For the past one year, it is hard not to relate the word “selfie” with OPPO Malaysia’s smartphones given how the company has been working hard to establish its devices which include F1, F1 Plus, and F1s as the “Selfie Expert” devices. This year though, the company has somehow decided to focus on the power of rear camera with the arrival of R9s in our market.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 14-01-2017
Bron: Stuff TV EN→NL Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi 5 is a worthy contender, although it doesn’t have the same expandable storage, and the excellent OnePlus 3 is a smidge more expensive, but packs a more powerful Snapdragon 820 chip. In any case, both examples do not have the will to last as long as the R9s.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 05-01-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: GSM Arena EN→NL Archive.org version
That said, Oppo's execution is the best, and this isn't just because of the six-string antenna design (though that's a big part of it). The R9s has the same screen size as the iPhone 7 Plus, but you wouldn't guess it - the Oppo is so much more compact and lighter. The fingerprint reader is faster than Apple's too.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 05-12-2016
Bron: Lowyat.net EN→NL Archive.org version
True to its promise, OPPO today has unveiled two new smartphones called R9s and R9s Plus. As indicated by their names, these new devices are generally the successor to the R9 (released in Malaysia as F1 Plus) and R9 Plus smartphones which themselves were just launched around seven months ago.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 19-10-2016
Bron: Chinahandys.net DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 06-04-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prestatie: 50% beeldscherm: 90% mobiliteit: 90% afwerking: 100%
Bron: El Confidencial ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 07-12-2016
Bron: Komorkomania PL→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 20-10-2016
Bron: Komorkomania PL→NL Archive.org version
Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 14-10-2016
Bron: Webriyota.com TR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 16-01-2017
Bron: TechZ VN→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 16-04-2017
Commentaar
Qualcomm Adreno 506:
Alleen oudere games kunnen vloeiend draaien met deze grafische chips (als ze niet veeleisend zijn). Gedeeld geheugen grafische cores in deze categorie hebben het voordeel van minder warmte-ontwikkeling en langere batterijlooptijd. Voor kantoor, internet, beeldcorrectie- en videomonteringswerk zijn deze grafische chips nog steeds bruikbaar zonder enige beperkingen.
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Grafische Kaarten en de passende Benchmark Tabel.
625:
Mid-range octa-core-SoC met acht ARM Cortex-A53 CPU-cores geklokt aan maximaal 2 GHz, een Adreno 506 GPU, een DDR3L-1866-geheugencontroller en een X9 LTE-modem (Cat. 7). Gefabriceerd in het nieuwe 14nm-proces.
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Processors.
5.50": Dit scherm is al redelijk groot voor een smartphone, maar wordt veelvuldig toegepast.
Grote schermformaten laten hogere resoluties toe. Details zoals letters zijn groter. Anderzijds is het energieverbruik lager bij kleine schermdiagonalen en de toestellen zijn kleiner, lichter en goedkoper.
>>Om de fijnheid van het scherm te vinden, kijk in onze DPI-lijst.
82.4%: Deze score moet gezien worden als gemiddeld, omdat het aantal notebooks dat hoger scoort ongeveer gelijk is aan het aantal dat lager scoort.
>> De verdere informatie kan worden gevonden in onze hulp voor de aankoop van laptops.