Nokia 3.2
Laptopspecificaties
Secundaire Camera: 5 MPix f/2.2, 27mm, 1.12µm
Price comparison
Gemiddelde van 8 score (van 25 beoordelingen)
Testrapporten voor de Nokia 3.2
The Nokia 3.2 brings a large IPS display, a modern design and Google Assistant integration to the party to outdo other budget smartphones. Android One makes the device an attractive option, but will its lack of a fingerprint sensor prove to be a deal breaker? Read on in this detailed review to find out.
Bron: Ausdroid EN→NL Archive.org version
You can purchase the Nokia 3.2 from Harvey Norman in Black or Steel colours or Big W (black colour only) for $249, or you can also get the device on a plan through Pennytel mobile for $186.79 with free phone cover and with plans starting from $11 per month.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 23-08-2019
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Unbox EN→NL Archive.org version
While the Nokia 3.2 debuted earlier this year at MWC 2019, it has a disappointing price-to-specs ratio. With its Php 6,990 price tag, it is expensive for a quad-core smartphone. You can opt instead for the Nokia 6.1, which has a massive price cut and the same price.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 19-08-2019
Bron: Yugatech EN→NL Archive.org version
Like all smartphones, the Nokia 3.2 has its pros and cons. It has Android One as its operating system, possesses a dedicated micro SD slot, has a dedicated Google Assistant button, and pretty modest battery life. Its cons outweigh the pros though, such as its disappointing performance, washed-out front, and rear camera photo quality, lack of portrait mode, poor audio quality, and honestly, its asking price of PHP 7,990 is just too steep for its league. We think there are other smartphones out there that are more worth your PHP 8,000 and can turn those 3.2 cons into pros.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 10-08-2019
Bron: The Mobile Indian EN→NL Archive.org version
Nokia 3.2 comes with plus points like a large display, big battery and stock Android experience. But the phone lags in performance with underpowered processor and camera. At the price range of around Rs 9,500 which will get you the 3GB variant of the Nokia 3.2, there are other better options available in the market like the Redmi Note 7 or the Realme 3 Pro which offer much better performance, cameras. One can only consider this phone for its stock Android experience, solid build, and a decent battery backup.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 04-07-2019
Bron: NDTV Gadgets EN→NL Archive.org version
The Nokia 3.2 is targeted at folks looking for a phone with a large display suitable for multimedia consumption, and also one that packs a large battery that easily lasts over a day. And even though the display quality could have been better, the Nokia 3.2 delivers on those two counts. The bloatware-free Android experience and timely updates are also bonuses, but that is just about all there is on the positive side.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 11-06-2019
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60% prijs: 60% prestatie: 50% beeldscherm: 60% mobiliteit: 90% afwerking: 60%
Bron: Business Standard EN→NL Archive.org version
Priced at Rs 10,790 (3GB/32GB), the Nokia 3.2 might not be the best phone in terms of performance and camera. Consider this phone for its pure and optimised stock Android experience, solid build and a decent battery with good on-battery time.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 10-06-2019
Bron: Think Digit EN→NL Archive.org version
The Nokia 3.2 variant line-up ends where the Nokia 4.2 begins. According to Nokia’s website, the 3GB RAM variant of the Nokia 3.2 costs Rs 10,790. The 3GB RAM variant of the Nokia 4.2 costs Rs 10,990. This slim difference in price gives a buyer very little reason to consider the Nokia 3.2 over the Nokia 4.2. In almost every way except the screen size, the Nokia 4.2 is better and offers more bang for the buck. Unless you desperately crave the larger 6.26-inch screen, go with the Nokia 4.2 if a classy budget Nokia smartphone is what you want to buy. If you're open to other brands, consider the Redmi 7 too. In summary, the Nokia 3.2 offers mediocre performance on almost all fronts, making a very weak case for itself in front of its slightly costlier sibling.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 03-06-2019
Beoordeling: Totale score: 61%
Bron: Gadgets Now EN→NL Archive.org version
Nokia 3.2 is a big screen phone with optimal battery life. However, the slow-performance and not-so-good camera quality holds the device back against its competitors. It is a budget phone priced under Rs 10,000 category. It will directly compete with the recently launched Redmi Y3 and Realme C2. Both these devices have better specifications, at least on paper, when compared to Nokia 3.2.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 31-05-2019
Beoordeling: Totale score: 50%
Bron: India Today EN→NL Archive.org version
The Nokia 3.2 and Nokia 4.2 share much of the same philosophies when it comes to design, hardware and software. The Nokia 3.2 comes with a similar waterdrop display, a dedicated Google Assistant button, a notification light power button and a stock Android Pie experience. But the Nokia 3.2 is a big phone with a tall display and a large battery life, which are some of its best features. It is quite simply a phone that aims to please users who consume a lot of media on a phone.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 21-05-2019
Beoordeling: Totale score: 75%
Bron: The Mobile Indian EN→NL Archive.org version
The Nokia 3.2 looks are quite decent in nature and the display is large, which some might find useful. The hardware seems to be an underdog when compared to the rest of the competition in this price range. The cameras are not that interesting, to be honest. The only takeaway here is the Android One branding and large 4,000mAh battery.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 21-05-2019
Bron: The Indian Express EN→NL Archive.org version
Nokia 3.2 has a very sturdy build and feels like a premium device in hand even though it is made out of plastic. It has a good display, stock Android UI and a good battery for the price. However, considering that the performance and the cameras will struggle against phones like Realme 3, Redmi Note 7, Redmi 7, which are in similar price range.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 21-05-2019
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Techradar EN→NL Archive.org version
It’s not going to redefine mobile phones, but the Nokia 3.2 still feels like a useful device for those on a budget, especially with its bulky battery.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 24-02-2019
Bron: GSM Arena EN→NL Archive.org version
We really like what HMD is doing with the Nokia brand in both the middle and higher range and we applaud the company for its grit and dedication that it takes to be successful in this business. Keep it up, HMD - just be cautious, because rapid growth is a double edged sword.
Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 24-02-2019
Bron: Frandroid FR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 15-08-2019
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60% prestatie: 50% beeldscherm: 60% mobiliteit: 60% afwerking: 60%
Bron: Mega Obzor RU→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 26-01-2020
Bron: FPT shop VN→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 12-06-2020
Bron: FPT shop VN→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 25-07-2019
Bron: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 09-07-2019
Bron: Phong Vu VN→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 03-06-2019
Bron: FPT shop VN→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 26-05-2019
Bron: FPT shop VN→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 24-05-2019
Bron: FPT shop VN→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 23-05-2019
Bron: Viettelstore VN→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 22-05-2019
Bron: FPT shop VN→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 21-05-2019
Bron: Viettelstore VN→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 15-05-2019
Commentaar
Qualcomm Adreno 504:
Alleen oudere games kunnen vloeiend draaien met deze grafische chips (als ze niet veeleisend zijn). Gedeeld geheugen grafische cores in deze categorie hebben het voordeel van minder warmte-ontwikkeling en langere batterijlooptijd. Voor kantoor, internet, beeldcorrectie- en videomonteringswerk zijn deze grafische chips nog steeds bruikbaar zonder enige beperkingen.
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Grafische Kaarten en de passende Benchmark Tabel.
SD 429: Instapmodel SoC dat medio 2018 werd aangekondigd. Het integreert 4 ARM Cortex-A53 CPU-kernen geklokt op maximaal 2 GHz, een LPDDR3-geheugencontroller (933 MHz) en draadloze radio's voor WiFi en 4G/LTE (max. 150 / 75 MBits). De chip wordt geproduceerd in het moderne 12nm proces en is ook geschikt voor kleine apparaten.
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Processors.
6.26": Er bestaan maar weinig smartphones met een groter scherm.
Grote schermformaten laten hogere resoluties toe. Details zoals letters zijn groter. Anderzijds is het energieverbruik lager bij kleine schermdiagonalen en de toestellen zijn kleiner, lichter en goedkoper.
>>Om de fijnheid van het scherm te vinden, kijk in onze DPI-lijst.
63.1%: Zulke slechte cijfers zijn zeldzaam. Er zijn bijna geen notebooks die slechtere cijfers hebben gekregen.
>> De verdere informatie kan worden gevonden in onze hulp voor de aankoop van laptops.