Motorola Moto G7 Power
Laptopspecificaties
Secundaire Camera: 8 MPix 8 MP, ƒ/2.2, 1.12um Pixel, Displayblitz
Price comparison
Gemiddelde van 26 score (van 50 beoordelingen)
Testrapporten voor de Motorola Moto G7 Power
On paper, the Motorola Moto G7 Power is all about battery life. Motorola promises up to 60 hours of battery life from a single charge, but the device shares many traits with its G7 siblings like its glass back and Snapdragon 632 SoC. Read on to find out how the latest Moto G7 model to enter our offices fares in our tests and whether it lives up to expectations.
Bron: AndroidWorld.nl Archive.org version
Motorola heeft vier smartphones in zijn G-reeks uitgebracht waarmee het elke soort gebruiker onder de 300 euro kan bereiken. De Moto G7 Power kost 210 euro en daar krijg je erg goede prestaties voor in de plaats en een waanzinnige accuduur, die ongeëvenaard is. Zelfs de Moto 5E en de Huawei P30 Pro moeten het dik afleggen tegen de G7 Power.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 08-05-2019
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90%
Anderstalige testrapporten
Bron: Tom's Guide EN→NL Archive.org version
The G7 Power is not a flashy device. For the most part, it's a fine option for a cheap phone, with performance that's serviceable (so long as you don't game) and a software experience and selection of features that are among the finest in its class.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 11-03-2020
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Tom's Guide EN→NL Archive.org version
The G7 Power is not a flashy device. For the most part, it's a fine option for a cheap phone, with performance that's serviceable (so long as you don't game) and a software experience and selection of features that are among the finest in its class.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 04-02-2020
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Ausdroid EN→NL Archive.org version
The G7 Power isn’t a bad phone and as I said earlier, had I not recently used the G7 which was only $50 more in cost – it would probably have rated far higher for me. The problem is that Motorola have proven that they can do far better than this on the camera and screen which is a little disappointing.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 11-06-2019
Bron: Tom's Guide EN→NL Archive.org version
For my money, I'd skip the regular G7's frivolous features, save $50 and go for the G7 Power. The peace of mind of having a phone that lasts an eternity is worth it. While the Nokia 7.1 offers a more premium design and better camera if you have more to spend, anyone chiefly concerned about battery life and looking for a device under $300 needn't look further than the G7 Power.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 26-04-2019
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Android Guys EN→NL Archive.org version
Both the G7 and the G7 Power offer great devices for Moto to add to its lineup for 2019. However, they target a need for two different people depending on their preference. Do you want a sleeker design with slightly better internals, screen, and camera? Then you should buy the G7 standard.
Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 24-04-2019
Bron: The Verge EN→NL Archive.org version
To me, the G7 Power really feels like the Moto G7 to get. Its battery life is incredible and worth the cost-cutting that Motorola did elsewhere. When you’ve got a $250 phone that’s plenty good at a smartphone’s core duties and can handily outlast a Galaxy S10 Plus or iPhone XR, that’s pretty special.
Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 10-04-2019
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Tom's Guide EN→NL Archive.org version
Buy it. The Moto G7 Power isn't pretty, but it's powerful enough and has superior battery life. Those looking for a more-premium midrange handset should consider Nokia's 7.1, but if all you need is a long-lasting smartphone under $300, this is your best bet.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 03-04-2019
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Android Authority EN→NL Archive.org version
The Moto G7 and Moto G7 Power offer excellent value. You're getting a great design, modern features, and clean and fast software. For the price, Motorola elegantly balances performance and features without making too many compromises. The Moto G7 will give you the best that Motorola has to offer in the G7 series while the Moto G7 Power focuses on extended battery life.
Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 03-04-2019
Bron: PC Mag EN→NL Archive.org version
The Motorola Moto G7 Power offers excellent performance, two-day battery life, and an attractive design for a budget-friendly price.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 02-04-2019
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Neowin EN→NL Archive.org version
If the Moto G7 Power was the only device to come out from the G7 series, maybe along with the G7 Play, I'd say it's a solid device. But sadly, it sits aside the G7, which only costs $50 more. The Moto G7 is more stylish, has more RAM, has a better camera, has a better display, has better audio, and more. Motorola also still sells the Moto G6, which has a 1080p display, along with a 64GB storage and 4GB RAM variant, and that only costs $199.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 31-03-2019
Bron: Neowin EN→NL Archive.org version
Earlier this month, I reviewed the Moto G7, and once again it sets the bar for the mid-range. But Motorola launched a variety of G7 devices, and now I've got my hands on the Moto G7 Power.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 23-03-2019
Bron: Techradar EN→NL Archive.org version
While its camera and design won't blow away users of high-end phones, the Moto G7 Power's impressive battery size and specs make it a compelling option for users on a budget. Not all its features are immediately intuitive, which holds the phone back from greatness.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 12-03-2019
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Phone Arena EN→NL Archive.org version
Overall, Moto is not doing anything extraordinary, but it does not need to: the new Moto phones are an evolution in terms of design with thinner bezels and more stylish looks, they are faster with the Snapdragon 6xx series of chips, and they work reliably, with a clean and likeable interface.
Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Lengte onbekend, Datum: 20-02-2019
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Pocket Lint EN→NL Archive.org version
The Moto G7 Power has a lot of strings to its bow. It sits at the affordable end of the Android spectrum, providing unbeatable battery power at a great price point. There's a big display, expandable storage, bloat-free software, and enough power to attack most things - even if you need to let the settings slide.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 19-02-2019
Beoordeling: Totale score: 100%
Bron: GSM Arena EN→NL Archive.org version
Obviously, the Moto G7 Power isn't the most powerful smartphone in its price bracket. Motorola is no Xiaomi or Realme, so we never really expected for Moto to match their budget offers. And yet, the Power comes very close, which is quite the surprise.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 17-02-2019
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Stuff TV EN→NL Archive.org version
The perfect solution for those tired of phones that empty their batteries, and your bank account, too quickly.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 12-02-2019
Beoordeling: Totale score: 100%
Bron: Trusted Reviews EN→NL Archive.org version
Offering a near-unskinned version of Android, solid specs for the money and a giant 5000mAh cell, the Moto G7 Power may not be cutting-edge, or the most alluring phone on the market. However, if it can deliver on Motorola’s battery claims then it could be one of the best sub-£200 phones to arrive this year.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 08-02-2019
Bron: Techradar EN→NL Archive.org version
The Moto G7 Power is a decent budget phone with a colossal 5,000mAh battery, a feature that is far and away the most exciting thing about the phone.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 07-02-2019
Bron: Tech Stage DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 23-04-2019
Bron: Inside Handy DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 17-04-2019
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Curved DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 18-03-2019
Bron: WinFuture DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 04-03-2019
Bron: Computerbase DE→NL Archive.org version
Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 26-02-2019
Bron: Spiegel Online DE→NL Archive.org version
Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 16-02-2019
Bron: Android Pit DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 07-02-2019
Bron: c't - 6/19
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 01-02-2019
Bron: Arturogoga ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 21-06-2019
Beoordeling: Totale score: 85%
Bron: El Androide Libre ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 01-04-2019
Bron: Computerhoy ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 01-04-2019
Beoordeling: Totale score: 75% functionaliteiten: 70% beeldscherm: 70% mobiliteit: 100% afwerking: 60%
Bron: Tuexperto ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 11-03-2019
Bron: Andro 4 All ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 01-03-2019
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 21-02-2019
Bron: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 17-02-2019
Bron: Gizmodo Brasil PT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 23-04-2019
Bron: Showmetech.com.br PT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 20-02-2019
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prestatie: 70% mobiliteit: 90% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Smartphone Italia IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 17-05-2019
Bron: Andrea Galeazzi IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 03-04-2019
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70% prijs: 79% beeldscherm: 65% mobiliteit: 95% afwerking: 69%
Bron: Frandroid FR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 13-07-2019
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Frandroid FR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 05-07-2019
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70% prestatie: 70% beeldscherm: 60% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 80%
Bron: AndroidPit.fr FR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 07-02-2019
Bron: AndroidPit.fr FR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 07-02-2019
Bron: Antyweb PL→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 09-04-2019
Bron: Tabletowo PL→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 30-03-2019
Beoordeling: Totale score: 73% prestatie: 85% beeldscherm: 65% mobiliteit: 100% afwerking: 75%
Bron: Ferra.ru RU→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 14-10-2019
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90%
Bron: Mega Obzor RU→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 12-07-2019
Bron: Mega Obzor RU→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 21-04-2019
Bron: Mobil DK DA→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 28-03-2019
Beoordeling: Totale score: 69% beeldscherm: 50% mobiliteit: 100% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Mobil.se SV→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 12-04-2019
Beoordeling: Totale score: 74%
Bron: M3 PC för alla SV→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 20-03-2019
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Commentaar
Qualcomm Adreno 506:
Alleen oudere games kunnen vloeiend draaien met deze grafische chips (als ze niet veeleisend zijn). Gedeeld geheugen grafische cores in deze categorie hebben het voordeel van minder warmte-ontwikkeling en langere batterijlooptijd. Voor kantoor, internet, beeldcorrectie- en videomonteringswerk zijn deze grafische chips nog steeds bruikbaar zonder enige beperkingen.
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Grafische Kaarten en de passende Benchmark Tabel.
SD 632:
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Processors.
6.20": Er bestaan maar weinig smartphones met een groter scherm.
Grote schermformaten laten hogere resoluties toe. Details zoals letters zijn groter. Anderzijds is het energieverbruik lager bij kleine schermdiagonalen en de toestellen zijn kleiner, lichter en goedkoper.
>>Om de fijnheid van het scherm te vinden, kijk in onze DPI-lijst.
79.43%: Dit cijfer is niet echt overtuigend. Het moet in acht worden genomen dat er bijna geen laptops zijn die een score onder de 60% hebben. Dit notebook is beneden gemiddeld beoordeeld, en is niet aanbevolen te kopen.
>> De verdere informatie kan worden gevonden in onze hulp voor de aankoop van laptops.