LG G Pad 7.0
Laptopspecificaties

Price comparison
Gemiddelde van 6 score (van 11 beoordelingen)
Testrapporten voor de LG G Pad 7.0
Bron: Trusted Reviews
EN→NL Archive.org versionThe G Pad 7.0 is a decent choice if you're seeking portability in a tablet. It's about the size of a book and is therefore easy to slip into your bag. While it maintains parity with the G Pad 8.0 and G Pad 10.1 in some respects, the lower internal memory and weaker main camera make it a less appealing prospect, purely when it comes to specifications. To be brutally honest, the 8.0 model is only slightly larger and doesn't cost a great deal more – it's arguably the smarter choice, even if it's not quite as portable.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 17-12-2014
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70% prijs: 70% prestatie: 70% beeldscherm: 70% mobiliteit: 70% afwerking: 70%
Bron: Stuff TV
EN→NL Archive.org versionThe LG G Pad 7.0 is not the kind of tablet that’s going to get pulses racing. It’s a low-cost device, and there are signs of that, particularly in its screen. However, it also gets you a bunch of features not often seen in smaller tablets. The IR transmitter gives it lounge skills missing from the Nexus 7, multi-tasking is given a lot of promotion for a tablet this small and it can pair with your phone for extra notifications juice.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 16-10-2014
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Pocket Lint
EN→NL Archive.org versionThe G Pad 7.0 is a solid enough tablet product, but simultaneously feels like a disappointment compared to last year's G Pad success. It's not going to steal the Nexus 7 crown by any means, but that's to compare it against the wrong rank. In the world of Asus MeMo Pad 7 and Tesco Hudl the LG G Pad 7.0 holds its own. It's a solid product that would make a decent coffee-table tablet for the whole family.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 09-10-2014
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Laptop Mag
EN→NL Archive.org versionThe LG G Pad 7.0 makes a few compromises to achieve its low price, but overall it's a pretty good bargain. The tablet boasts a vivid 1280 x 800 screen, outstanding audio quality and epic battery life, all for the very reasonable cost of $150. However, LG did make some trade-offs to hit this budget price: Photos and videos look grainy and washed out, and the tablet delivers middling performance compared with other 7-inch slates.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 23-09-2014
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: PC Mag
EN→NL Archive.org versionThe LG G Pad 7.0 doesn't do a lot to stand out from the crowded field of small-screen tablets, but some unique and useful software features coupled with an aggressive price give it a leg up on competitors. Spec for spec, it's the Galaxy Tab 4's equal, but Samsung charges $50 more, and I'd argue LG's software execution is superior. The G Pad 7.0 offers great value if you can deal with relatively modest performance and a simply average display. Our Editors' Choice for small screen tablets remains the Google Nexus 7, which has a sharper full HD panel and stock Android experience with guaranteed timely updates.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 27-08-2014
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: GSM Arena
EN→NL Archive.org versionAny way you look at the G Pad 7.0 it's hard to find much to frown at. Not much to get excited about either - after all the Nexus 7 had the exact same specs two years ago. 7-inchers have since been trying to beat Google's price without making too much compromise. Well, they're finally getting there. HD resolution on a 7" diagonal is the new entry level in tablets, at still a safe distance from Apple and with no dime-a-dozen WSVGA devices from white label manufacturers crowding the space. If you're shopping for your first tablet, the LG G Pad 7.0 is very much an option but so are a bunch of tablets from of Samsung, Acer, Asus and Huawei.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 04-08-2014
Bron: Cyberbloc
DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 06-10-2014
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90%
Bron: Tuexperto
ES→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 17-11-2014
Bron: Tabletowo
PL→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 04-08-2014
Bron: Notebook-Center.ru
RU→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 08-10-2014
Bron: Tablet.bg
BU→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 25-07-2014
Commentaar
Qualcomm Adreno 305:
Deze grafische kaarten voor notebooks zijn niet bruikbaar voor games. Als ze al games kunnen draaien, dan doen ze dat met grafische afwijkingen en heel lage framesnelheid. Voor gamers zijn deze chips ongeschikt! Kantoor en internet taken zijn, daarentegen, geen probleem voor deze GPUs.
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Grafische Kaarten en de passende Benchmark Tabel.
400 MSM8226:
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Processors.



