Huawei Nova Plus
Laptopspecificaties
Secundaire Camera: 8 MPix (Fixfocus)
Price comparison
Gemiddelde van 35 score (van 71 beoordelingen)
Testrapporten voor de Huawei Nova Plus
Eindelijk 4K-opname! Huawei's Nova Plus maakt een premium indruk in de mainstream-categorie en is de eerste smartphone van de Chinese fabrikant met Ultra-HD video-opname. Huawei maakt echter niet gebruik van zijn eigen Kirin-SoC, maar een chip van Qualcomm. Hoe brengt de smartphone het ervan af in het competitieve marktsegment onder 400 euro (~$432)?
Bron: Tablets Magazine Archive.org version
Als we alles bij elkaar nemen dat komen we op een positief oordeel voor de Huawei P9 Plus uit. Het toestel oogt chique en heeft een strak afgewerkte behuizing. Het enige nadeel van die behuizing is dat deze nogal glad is. Qua prestaties zijn we zeer onder de indruk van dit toestel, maar op het gebied van (de eigen) software heeft Huawei nog wat stappen te zetten, al zitten er handige functies als Press Touch in. De accuduur is boven gemiddeld goed, de vingerafdrukscanner functioneert uitstekend, de camera’s verzorgen zeer fraaie foto’s en het 5.5-inch display laat alles in rijke en dynamische kleuren, en met voldoende scherpte, zien. Een zeer goede all-rounder dus, die door zijn premium prijs wel concurrentie heeft van verschillende premium smartphones van andere fabrikanten.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 07-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Anderstalige testrapporten
Bron: Ausdroid EN→NL Archive.org version
All in all it’s a solid, good looking device that will meet the needs of the vast majority of users and perhaps most importantly at an outright price that won’t break the bank. I’d seriously consider purchasing this as a backup device personally and wouldn’t hesitate to recommend it to the majority of my family and friends who are on the hunt for a new device.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 09-03-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 74% prijs: 80% mobiliteit: 85% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Mobile Syrup EN→NL Archive.org version
The Asus Zenfone 3 offers a much more reasonable comparison at about $430. However, it’s only available online — which negates the opportunity to get it for a reduced rate upfront from a carrier and may not provide the same quality of warranty when bought from a carrier. Meanwhile, the Nova Plus can be picked up at Rogers, Fido and Virgin for $0 down on a two-year contract. While the bloated UI may be enough to turn some off of the phone, the steady capability of this well-designed device makes it a great contender in the mid-range space.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 14-12-2016
Bron: Gadgetguy EN→NL Archive.org version
Chinese telecommunications giant Huawei has released in Australia its latest smart phone from its new Nova series, the Huawei Nova Plus. (I say giant” because it’s true: $US60 billion in revenues last year!) Priced at $549, it’s available now at Harvey Norman and Officeworks.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 24-11-2016
Bron: Good Gear Guide EN→NL Archive.org version
Huawei’s Nova Plus is something of a jack of all trades. There’s little it can’t do and it uses the latest, second-tier components. The problem is that it’s still competing with many of the best last-gen phones which are still better and have reduced prices.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 21-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: New Atlas EN→NL Archive.org version
We enjoyed our time with these two phones and they tick a lot of the right boxes – particular in design and battery life – but we don't think Huawei has quite done enough to make an impact in a very congested market. If it can build on what it's done with the Nova and Nova Plus, and get European and US carriers more interested in the coming months, then the 2017 editions could be much more appealing propositions.
Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 26-10-2016
Bron: Brighthand EN→NL Archive.org version
The Huawei nova plus has an excellent design and fantastic finish. This convincing craftsmanship is its chief selling point. The display, chipset, and camera performance are just good enough not to drag it down.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 24-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Tech Advisor EN→NL Archive.org version
While the Huawei Nova Plus certainly looks the part with a premium design and a bright, crisp display, the internals let it down. Despite featuring an improved camera with OIS, the photos produced by the smartphone are barely improved when compared to the Nova. However, we could look past the camera if it wasn’t for the sub-par CPU and GPU, which produce fairly disappointing results when compared to other mid-range Android smartphones. While the Nova Plus isn’t a terrible mid-range smartphone, there are better options on the market.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 24-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60% prijs: 50% prestatie: 60% functionaliteiten: 70% afwerking: 90%
Bron: International Business Times EN→NL Archive.org version
The Huawei Nova and Nova Plus are perfectly capable mid-range handsets from Huawei that offer solid specs at a reasonable price point. While they lack imagination from a design perspective, both are well-built and premium-looking, at times echoing the phones Huawei hopes to replace at the top of the smartphone pecking order. However, there's nothing on offer here to tip them much above the average mark, and once again Huawei's software prevents the smartphones from feeling like something that could pose a serious threat to its Android rivals. And in the mid-range smartphone market, Huawei has a lot to contend with.
Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 20-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Phone Arena EN→NL Archive.org version
In the end, neither of these phones is likely to steer you wrong, especially if you're not demanding a ton from your smartphone – and if you want a handset that feels great to hold, and has a battery that won't leave you hanging, either makes a really nice choice. But there's also not a lot here that screams THIS is the mid-priced phone to get. As a result, we'd definitely recommend considering these two Novas – but maybe check out some phones from the competition, as well.
Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 14-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 73%
Bron: Expert Reviews EN→NL Archive.org version
Even so, that puts the Nova Plus at a bit of a disadvantage, for while its screen, performance and camera are all fantastic, the OnePlus 3 does everything a lot better for less. I’d definitely recommend the Nova Plus over the regular Nova, but if you’re looking for a great mid-range phablet, the OnePlus 3 is still the way to go – not only is it considerably faster, but its battery life is also significantly better.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 13-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Recombu EN→NL Archive.org version
The Nova Plus is yet another 5.5-inch mighty mobile, which is elevated by some seriously impressive battery life. Media fans will love the spacious Full HD screen, but the likes of the OnePlus 3 and Samsung’s Galaxy A7 2016 boast the same strengths as the Nova Plus, at a lower asking price.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 04-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90%
Bron: Android Headlines EN→NL Archive.org version
All-in-all, I think the Nova Plus is a device that Huawei has mis-positioned a little bit. In all of the above, we have established that the Nova Plus is a great smartphone, which it is. There’s no denying that, but with a price tag of €429, Huawei have priced it a little higher than I thought they would. Sure, the build quality and design here is great, and that fingerprint sensor is certainly a great luxury to have included, but the rest of the Nova Plus is pretty standard.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 03-10-2016
Bron: Pocket Lint EN→NL Archive.org version
Huawei phones tend to deliver the same old story: great hardware, poor software. It's no different than with the Nova Plus which, at its €429 price point, makes it hard to recommend over a faster, more powerful OnePlus 3 or more exciting-looking Honor 8 (which, in essence, is from Huawei anyway!).
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 29-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Android Authority EN→NL Archive.org version
With 3GB of RAM, 32GB of internal storage, 4K video recording and Full HD displays then the nova and nova plus certainly have the hallmarks of couple of upper mid-range devices. That is even more so for the nova plus with its built-in OIS and larger display. The main weaknesses are the the processor package, and the camera setup.
Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 21-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 83% prestatie: 80% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 90% afwerking: 85%
Bron: Android Central EN→NL Archive.org version
Overall, the Huawei Nova and Nova Plus are two excellent, if slightly overpriced mid-range phones. As always with Huawei, the build quality is excellent and performance is just fine, but software remains a sticking point. If you can get past (or even learn to like) EMUI, both phones deliver exceptional battery life, pretty good cameras and a choice of two form factors: The regular Nova is svelte and pocket-friendly, while the Nova Plus packs in a significant camera upgrade and a small battery bump alongside its bigger display.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 19-09-2016
Bron: GSM Arena EN→NL Archive.org version
Huawei's on an upward trend and its recent phones are consistently showing it. The attention to detail on the exterior has been matched on the inside and the polished software is one of Huawei's definite strengths. This is really where the EMIUI is shining lately: innovative and helpful gestures, clean yet customizable interface and top-notch camera processing algorithms. The Huawei nova plus was developed and built to a high standard. The airplane-grade aluminum has made it reasonably lightweight but sturdy, and it feels quite convincingly premium in terms of both hand feel and performance.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 14-09-2016
Bron: Tech Advisor EN→NL Archive.org version
While we’ve only had a limited time with the Huawei Nova Plus, we’re fairly happy with what we see. The display is bright and crisp, and the build quality is similar to that of a flagship smartphone. The 16Mp rear-facing snapper with OIS is also an attractive point, allowing users to take crisp, sharp and detailed photos and smooth videos. The biggest question is – is it worth the money? While no UK pricing has been announced, the 429 Euro price tag makes it more expensive than the OnePlus 3, which offers a more powerful processor and more RAM – but we’ll hold our reservations until we get one back to PC Advisor towers and put it through its paces. Make sure you check back soon for a more thorough verdict!
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 05-09-2016
Bron: Pocket Lint EN→NL Archive.org version
The Nova Plus gives Huawei a larger screened mid-range handset to rival some of the popular devices out there, like the offering from Moto. The Nova's strength is really in its premium metal bodywork, giving you a phone that looks the part.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 01-09-2016
Bron: Techradar EN→NL Archive.org version
Available in silver, grey or gold, the Huawei Nova+ is, like the Huawei Nova, a very competent device – and if the price isn't too extravagant it could be a top budget choice. However, there are some issues with the speed of the mid-range processor in our early testing, which causes a slight flicker of worry – but then these aren't retail-ready models, so performance could very well be optimised by the time they hit the stores.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 01-09-2016
Bron: Trusted Reviews EN→NL Archive.org version
While the smaller dimensions of the Nova make that handset stand out, the larger Plus model sort of fades into the mass of 5.5-inch phones on the market. Its design is less interesting than the Nova's, but it packs a good selection of specs nonetheless. The camera needs work, though, and this could the Nova Plus' downfall.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 01-09-2016
Bron: International Business Times EN→NL Archive.org version
The Huawei Nova and Nova Plus are unlikely to shake things up at the high end of the smartphone spectrum, but that's not the intention anyway. Instead, the devices are an attempt to tap into a burgeoning middle tier dominated by the likes of Samsung, Sony and LG and prove that no place is safe from the Chinese manufacturer's onslaught. On the other hand, despite their solid hardware and (mostly) good looks, there's no escaping the fact that the Nova and Nova Plus are two more additions to an ocean of mid-range smartphones.
Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 01-09-2016
Bron: Connect - 01/2017
Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 01-12-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 88%
Bron: WinFuture DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 28-11-2016
Bron: Computerbase DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 09-11-2016
Bron: Connect - Heft 12/2016
Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 01-11-2016
Bron: Smartphone Magazin - Heft 1/2017
Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 01-11-2016
Bron: Allround-PC.com DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 27-10-2016
Bron: Teltarif DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 24-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 79% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 60%
Bron: n-tv DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 16-10-2016
Bron: Inside Handy DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 14-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Curved DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 09-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 81% prestatie: 77% beeldscherm: 78% mobiliteit: 84%
Bron: MobiFlip DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 08-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 84%
Bron: WinFuture DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 04-10-2016
Bron: Android Pit DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 02-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Arturogoga ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 14-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 100% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Andro 4 All ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 13-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 85%
Bron: Computerhoy ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 24-09-2016
Bron: El Confidencial ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 21-09-2016
Bron: Xataka ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 20-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prestatie: 78% beeldscherm: 80% afwerking: 90%
Bron: Tuexperto ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 20-09-2016
Bron: El Androide Libre ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 13-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 88%
Bron: Chimera Revo IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 15-02-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% functionaliteiten: 80% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 85%
Bron: Cinafoniaci IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 18-01-2017
Bron: Stockisti IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 23-12-2016
Bron: Notebook Italia IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 07-11-2016
Bron: Androidiani IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 26-10-2016
Bron: Tecno Cino IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 26-10-2016
Bron: Ridble IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 25-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Smartphone e tablet android IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 20-10-2016
Beoordeling: prestatie: 80% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Quotidiano Hardware Upgrade IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 12-10-2016
Bron: AndroidWorld.it IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 12-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 82% prijs: 75% beeldscherm: 80% ergonomie: 80%
Bron: Techzilla.it IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 12-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 83% prijs: 75% prestatie: 80% beeldscherm: 80% afwerking: 90% ergonomie: 90%
Bron: Leonardo.it Tech IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 09-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prijs: 75% beeldscherm: 75% mobiliteit: 95% afwerking: 85% ergonomie: 80%
Bron: Andrea Galeazzi IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 05-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 79% prijs: 70% mobiliteit: 95% afwerking: 75%
Bron: AndroidPit.it IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 28-08-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Galaktyczny PL→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 05-12-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 84% prestatie: 90% beeldscherm: 90% mobiliteit: 75% afwerking: 90%
Bron: Tabletowo PL→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 04-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 83% prestatie: 60% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 95% afwerking: 75%
Bron: Hitech Vesti RU→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 06-10-2016
Bron: Ferra.ru RU→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 22-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 78%
Bron: Hi-Tech Mail RU→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 14-09-2016
Bron: Geeks.hu HU→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 12-09-2016
Bron: Svet Androida CZ→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 11-11-2016
Bron: Svet Androida CZ→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 11-11-2016
Bron: Mobilenet.cz CZ→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 16-09-2016
Bron: Smartphone.bg BU→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 06-01-2017
Bron: Tek.no NO→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 13-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Tek.no NO→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 13-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Fony.sk SK→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 15-10-2016
Bron: Moj Android SK→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 22-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 83% prestatie: 85% beeldscherm: 87% mobiliteit: 88% afwerking: 85%
Bron: Reviewzat →NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 08-11-2016
Commentaar
Qualcomm Adreno 506:
Alleen oudere games kunnen vloeiend draaien met deze grafische chips (als ze niet veeleisend zijn). Gedeeld geheugen grafische cores in deze categorie hebben het voordeel van minder warmte-ontwikkeling en langere batterijlooptijd. Voor kantoor, internet, beeldcorrectie- en videomonteringswerk zijn deze grafische chips nog steeds bruikbaar zonder enige beperkingen.
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Grafische Kaarten en de passende Benchmark Tabel.
625:
Mid-range octa-core-SoC met acht ARM Cortex-A53 CPU-cores geklokt aan maximaal 2 GHz, een Adreno 506 GPU, een DDR3L-1866-geheugencontroller en een X9 LTE-modem (Cat. 7). Gefabriceerd in het nieuwe 14nm-proces.
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Processors.
5.50": Dit scherm is al redelijk groot voor een smartphone, maar wordt veelvuldig toegepast.
Grote schermformaten laten hogere resoluties toe. Details zoals letters zijn groter. Anderzijds is het energieverbruik lager bij kleine schermdiagonalen en de toestellen zijn kleiner, lichter en goedkoper.
>>Om de fijnheid van het scherm te vinden, kijk in onze DPI-lijst.
78.37%: Dit cijfer is niet echt overtuigend. Het moet in acht worden genomen dat er bijna geen laptops zijn die een score onder de 60% hebben. Dit notebook is beneden gemiddeld beoordeeld, en is niet aanbevolen te kopen.
>> De verdere informatie kan worden gevonden in onze hulp voor de aankoop van laptops.