Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
Laptopspecificaties
Secundaire Camera: 8 MPix (Fixfocus f/2.0, 1080p-Video @ 30 fps)
Price comparison
Gemiddelde van 39 score (van 66 beoordelingen)
Testrapporten voor de Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
Evolutie. De opvolger van de MediaPad M2 uit 2015 is eindelijk gearriveerd: verwelkom de MediaPad M3. Het nieuwe model heeft dan wel vrijwel identieke afmetingen als zijn voorganger, maar beschikt wel over een groter beeldscherm met hogere resolutie, sterkere processor en een vingerafdrukscanner. We onderzoeken wat Huawei te bieden heeft in dit testrapport.
Bron: Unbox EN→NL Archive.org version
The tablet’s performance is pretty good, especially with games like Mobile Legends since the tablet didn’t show any signs of slowing down during the impromptu tournament that Huawei held at the launch with members of the media. Audio output is pretty good as well, along with the performance of that essentially 2K display. The large 5100mAh battery will probably power this tablet for quite a bit before needing to be recharged.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 09-05-2017
Bron: Android Guys EN→NL Archive.org version
Overall I really liked the MediaPad M3. I consider myself “techie-frugal”, in that I like nice stuff that works consistently, but I’ll be darned if I’m paying what the likes of Apple is demanding.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 24-02-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 78% prestatie: 80% beeldscherm: 90%
Bron: Computer Shopper EN→NL Archive.org version
Aside from its should-be-better battery life and a power button that's way too easy to whack accidentally, we found little not to like about the Huawei MediaPad M3. It's one of the few flagship-class Android tablets to make its way to our test bench in many a month, and its screen, speakers, metal shell, and excellent fingerprint sensor all impressed.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 16-02-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Tech Nave EN→NL Archive.org version
Every tech reviewer wants to find the perfect device and for a little while the Huawei MediaPad M3 certainly seemed like that device, except if you’re hoping to do some 2K pixel resolution gaming. In everything else, like media playback or productivity on the go it is superb, especially with the nice artificial leather case, which looks stylish and can be used as a stand. If you’re looking for a tablet for those purposes, it should fit in most handbags and pouches.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 14-02-2017
Bron: Talk Android EN→NL Archive.org version
On top of everything, the MediaPad M3 is only $299. It’s insane that you can get this much performance and quality out of a device that seems like it should cost twice as much, but Huawei pulled it off. If more manufacturers can release tablets anywhere close to the MediaPad M3, 2017 will be a fantastic year for Android tablets.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 09-02-2017
Bron: The Indian Express EN→NL Archive.org version
Huawei MediaPad M3 is a premium device, one where the price tag seems reasonable, if you go by the eBay listing. Huawei will bring the device to India, and the pricing should be closer to this range.With the MediaPad M3, you have solid device for media consumption; it is fast, packs a stunning display and has great sound output. Frankly for most regular users tablets have become entertainment consumption devices, and the Huawei MediaPad M3 delivers very well on that front.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 01-02-2017
Bron: Phone Arena EN→NL Archive.org version
The Huawei MediaPad M3 is not a bad tablet, in fact, it’s a really great choice if you want a well-built device for browsing the web and watching movies, but until it gets some much needed software tweaks, I’d suggest looking elsewhere for a more refined experience.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 22-12-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 68%
Bron: Stuff TV EN→NL Archive.org version
There's not much else out there at the top-end, with Samsung's Galaxy Tabs hoovering up most of the people that refuse to jump ship to iOS and the iPad, but this could have what it takes to carve out its own little niche. Brilliant build quality makes it perfect for carrying around everywhere. That great screen and fantastic sound help it eat up just about any video or music you can through at it, too. Gaming performance is a little iffy, and that camera isn't much to write home about though.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 11-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Laptop Mag EN→NL Archive.org version
The MediaPad M3 should wow users with its fast speed, high-res display and powerful speakers. The device costs more than most Android tablets, but you get what you pay for. Overall, the MediaPad M3 is an attractive option for Android users looking for a high-performing tablet with a beautiful design.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 02-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Tech Advisor EN→NL Archive.org version
In a stagnated market, the Huawei MediaPad M3 initially feels a little underwhelming. After extended use though, we reckon it’s a cut above the mid-range, but then again, from €349, you are paying for it. It’s a good alternative to an iPad if you want an Android tablet that’s bigger than an iPad mini but smaller than an iPad Air 2. But, who is specifically looking for that? The MediaPad is excellent and we recommend it, but it lacks a certain ‘wow’ factor that's largely down to the high number of existing Android tablets. The MediaPad 3 is a cut above, but you should also consider Samsung’s Galaxy Tab series for a similarly excellent Android tablet experience.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 02-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prijs: 70% prestatie: 80% functionaliteiten: 70% afwerking: 90%
Bron: PC Mag EN→NL Archive.org version
Huawei hasn't announced a U.S. price or release date for the Mediapad M3, and price is going to matter a lot here. With its sharp screen and light, single-handed form factor, the M3 looks like an excellent tablet for reading comics and watching video. But this is a highly competitive market. Looking at tablets with similar high-res screens, the Asus ZenPad Z8 runs for $249 from Verizon, and the iPad mini 4 starts at $299. The M3 has a better aspect ratio than the Z8 does for reading and the iPad mini offers more apps. It's going to have to fit into that price range to be competitive. Check back soon for price and release details, as well as a full review of the final hardware.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 01-09-2016
Bron: Alphr EN→NL Archive.org version
However, when I first wrote this review, we had no pricing information. Now we have it, it does take a little sheen off the tablet as it's in direct competition with the iPad Mini 4 which is a tough old battle to win. We've only been sent pricing in Euros, but even with an optimistic conversion it's a premium price to match the product. For the 32GB WiFi model, it'll set you back €349. Assuming they go by the standard conversion trick of calling it £299, that's only slightly undercutting the iPad Mini 4. It only gets pricier from there. The LTE 32GB model comes in at €399, as does the 64GB WiFi version. The 64GB LTE version hits €449.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 01-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Pocket Lint EN→NL Archive.org version
There's a lot to like about the Huawei MediaPad M3. It is as much as you might want from a tablet designed to entertain you, a great portal for your browsing, your movies and your gaming. It offers the performance that will satisfy many and avoids the temptation to encourage you to use it for work. It's well built and a pleasure to use.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 01-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Techradar EN→NL Archive.org version
The Huawei MediaPad M3 is a tablet with lots of admirable qualities. High screen resolution, ultra-low weight and speakers that go loud enough to become an anti-social menace in some situations earn a big thumbs-up. It's a pity, then, that the M3 is thrown off balance quite so dramatically by oddly poor gaming performance with high-end titles. The casual games everyone gets obsessed with for weeks at a time run fine, but those with console-like graphics tend to struggle to an extent that's quite rare for a tablet of this quality.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 01-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Trusted Reviews EN→NL Archive.org version
I do like the Huawei MediaPad M3, but it’s far from an essential purchase. It doesn’t do anything that a cheaper Android slate doesn’t; it just does those things with an added hit of style. The screen is decent, if overly reflective, and the metal-clad chassis is thin and light yet maintains a solid feel. The speakers, too, are superb for a small tablet.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 01-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70% prestatie: 70% mobiliteit: 70% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Expert Reviews EN→NL Archive.org version
The 8.4in screen is the big highlight, and if you excuse the slight dip in gaming prowess, the Kirin 950’s sheer processing oomph knocks its rivals for six. Battery life also takes a bit of a hit as a result, but if you want a powerful, compact, premium-feeling Android tablet, then the MediaPad M3 is going to take some beating.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 01-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Android Authority EN→NL Archive.org version
The Huawei MediaPad M3 offers an immersive display, great audio and long-lasting battery life and while gaming can be somewhat choppy, it is capable of playing high-end 3D games with few issues. You can also make phone calls with it and performance is a breeze but a generic design, average cameras and a questionable interface mean this won't be a tablet for everyone. If you can get past those shortcomings, it could be one of the best Android tablets currently available.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 01-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 84% prestatie: 87% beeldscherm: 90% afwerking: 83%
Bron: International Business Times EN→NL Archive.org version
Our first impressions of the Huawei MediaPad M3 are mostly very good. The hardware is excellent and a match for anything else on the market (Apple included), and while performance seems good, Huawei's software is as always its weakest point.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 01-09-2016
Bron: Gear Open EN→NL Archive.org version
There’s a lot to like about the Huawei MediaPad M3. It is as much as you might want from a tablet designed to entertain you, a great portal for your browsing, your movies and your gaming. It offers the performance that will satisfy many and avoids the temptation to encourage you to use it for work. It’s well built and a pleasure to use.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 01-09-2016
Bron: Android Mag DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 11-02-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 100% functionaliteiten: 100% beeldscherm: 100% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 100% ergonomie: 80%
Bron: PC Go - 2/2017
Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 01-01-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 93%
Bron: Smartphone Magazin - 2/2017
Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 01-01-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 96%
Bron: Connect - 01/2017
Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 01-12-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: PC Magazin - 01/2017
Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 01-12-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 93%
Bron: Computerbild - Heft 24/2016
Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 15-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 86%
Bron: c't - Heft 24/2016
Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 15-11-2016
Bron: Technik Surfer DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 13-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 75% prijs: 60% prestatie: 80% functionaliteiten: 1% mobiliteit: 100% afwerking: 100% ergonomie: 60%
Bron: MobiFlip DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 05-11-2016
Bron: Android Pit DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 01-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Areamobile DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 29-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 89% prestatie: 83% mobiliteit: 81% afwerking: 92% ergonomie: 95%
Bron: WinFuture DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 17-10-2016
Bron: Curved DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 11-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 82% prestatie: 77% beeldscherm: 90% mobiliteit: 80%
Bron: Tablet Blog DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 30-09-2016
Bron: Ofertaman ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 24-04-2018
Bron: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 15-05-2017
Bron: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 05-04-2017
Bron: Ofertaman ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 09-12-2016
Bron: PC Guia PT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 02-03-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90%
Bron: Andrea Galeazzi IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 10-01-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 78% prijs: 80% beeldscherm: 83% mobiliteit: 89% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Tecno Cino IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 21-12-2016
Bron: Ridble IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 07-12-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Pianeta Cellulare IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 06-12-2016
Bron: Pianeta Cellulare IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 12-11-2016
Bron: Pianeta Cellulare IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 02-11-2016
Bron: AndroidWorld.it IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 27-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 87% prijs: 75% functionaliteiten: 85% beeldscherm: 90% mobiliteit: 70% ergonomie: 85%
Bron: Smartphone e tablet android IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 21-10-2016
Beoordeling: prestatie: 80% beeldscherm: 70% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 70%
Bron: Quotidiano Hardware Upgrade IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 12-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 85% prijs: 80% functionaliteiten: 85% beeldscherm: 90% mobiliteit: 84% ergonomie: 75%
Bron: Les Androides FR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 06-12-2016
Bron: Frandroid FR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 05-12-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prestatie: 80% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 70% afwerking: 90%
Bron: Tablette-tactile.net FR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 25-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90%
Bron: Tablette-tactile.net FR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 27-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90%
Bron: AndroidPit.fr FR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 14-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: AndroidPit.fr FR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 10-09-2016
Bron: Tabletowo PL→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 03-01-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 93% beeldscherm: 95% mobiliteit: 90% afwerking: 95%
Bron: Spiders Web PL→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 28-12-2016
Bron: Helpix
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 22-01-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Helpix RU→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 09-01-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90%
Bron: Zoom RU→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 05-01-2017
Bron: Product Test RU→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 02-12-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90%
Bron: Mobileimho.ru RU→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 19-11-2016
Bron: Hitech Vesti RU→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 18-11-2016
Bron: Yamobi RU→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 18-11-2016
Bron: Product Test RU→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 16-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90%
Bron: Ferra.ru RU→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 29-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 85%
Bron: Zoom RU→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 21-09-2016
Bron: Tek.no NO→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 01-02-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Commentaar
ARM Mali-T880 MP4:
Mobile grafische kaart voor tablets en smartphones, die aangetroffen wordt in ARM-SoC's als de HiSilicon Kirin 950.
De meeste niet-veeleisende huidige games kunnen vloeiend draaien. Wees voorbereid op verminderde grafische weergave door lage detailinstellingen en lage resoluties. Toch verschaffen deze kaarten voldoende prestatie voor kantoor taken en video bekijken (niet voor HD videos).
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Grafische Kaarten en de passende Benchmark Tabel.
Kirin 950:
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Processors.
8.40": Deze schermdiagonaal is redelijk klein voor tablets.
Grote schermformaten laten hogere resoluties toe. Details zoals letters zijn groter. Anderzijds is het energieverbruik lager bij kleine schermdiagonalen en de toestellen zijn kleiner, lichter en goedkoper.
>>Om de fijnheid van het scherm te vinden, kijk in onze DPI-lijst.
83.31%: Deze score moet gezien worden als gemiddeld, omdat het aantal notebooks dat hoger scoort ongeveer gelijk is aan het aantal dat lager scoort.
>> De verdere informatie kan worden gevonden in onze hulp voor de aankoop van laptops.