Honor Magic7 Lite
Laptopspecificaties

Secundaire Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.45, Videos @1080p/30fps)
Price comparison
Gemiddelde van 24 score (van 40 beoordelingen)
Testrapporten voor de Honor Magic7 Lite
De Honor Magic7 Lite is robuust en licht, ondanks de grote batterij. Hij heeft ook een 108 MP camera en er wordt beweerd dat hij een schermhelderheid van meer dan 4.000 nits heeft. Maar als het aankomt op de hoogtepunten van de telefoon, dan slaat de teleurstelling snel toe.
Bron: OI Spice Tech News

Those days were gone when Honor used to release flawless phones back to back. And after 2020, most honor phones were going downhill. But the Honor Magic 7 Lite comes out as a refreshing breeze. It comes as a budget-centric phone and delivers according to the price point. Moreover, it features liquid screen protection, higher storage capacity, a curved display, etc. For example, performance is sluggish if you are an extreme user. Lowlight pictures would have been better. The software interface gives a mixed-bag response. Some core Android settings and the latest AI perks are missing.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 05-03-2025
Bron: Tech Advisor

The Honor Magic 7 Lite excels in areas like battery life, durability, and main camera performance, making it a reliable choice for users who value longevity and practicality. However, its dated design, average performance, and limited software support leave it trailing behind competitors in the fiercely competitive mid-range market. If battery life is your top priority, the Magic 7 Lite is a clear winner. But for those seeking a more well-rounded device, there are better options available.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 29-01-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Expert Reviews

Despite being a generally competent mid-range phone, the Honor Magic 7 Lite is ultimately tricky to recommend. Battery life is excellent and improvements like OIS for the main camera, faster charging speed and upgraded device durability just about account for the extra £50 premium. Even with these improvements, however, the Magic 7 Lite struggles to compete with the now-discounted Google Pixel 8a. It may not have as much storage or last as long, but the Pixel’s general performance, camera quality, display accuracy and software support are all far superior. The Magic 7 Lite puts up a valiant fight but it would have been better off avoiding the price hike and giving the Pixel a wider berth.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 14-01-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: DxOMark

The Honor Magic7 Lite’s battery achieved a top score ex aequo in our database thanks to a powerful performance in autonomy. Equipped with a serious 6600 mAh battery, the Honor Magic7 Lite, which is marketed as Honor X9c in some regions of the world, exhibited an impressive battery life of just over three and a half days under moderate usage. The device gained 12 hours of autonomy over the previous model, the Honor Magic6 Lite (5800 mAh), lasting 89 hours without needing to recharge. Across most test cases, particularly in video streaming and gaming, the Honor Magic7 Lite demonstrated exceptional autonomy, also achieving the No. 1 spot in our autonomy sub-score.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 07-01-2025
Bron: Irish Mirror

Overall, you get a well-made everyday device built to withstand knocks, drops and falls and yet it looks more premium than you might expect at its price point. If you are on a budget, this Honor handset will give you enough bang for your buck.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 02-01-2025
Bron: Stuff TV

In a few ways, the Honor Magic 7 Lite doesn’t make any meaningful progress over its predecessor. The entry-grade chipset is unchanged, the firm’s software upgrade commitments still lag behind rival brands, and now the styling feels that much more out of step with the rest of the phone world. It’s not all bad though. Some might argue the rear cameras have gone backwards by dropping the third snapper, but the Magic 6 Lite’s macro lens was a token inclusion at best, and adding optical image stabilisation has upped the Magic 7 Lite’s night-time performance among affordable rivals. This is also a much tougher handset, which will be great news for accident-prone shoppers. Ultimately you’ll buy the Magic 7 Lite for its colossal battery; there’s simply no other affordable option out there with such a high capacity. If you’re after a long-lasting handset that doesn’t look like an actual brick, you’ll be able to forgive the limited generational upgrades everywhere else.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 02-01-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Phandroid

At a price that rests between 200-300 USD (when converted), the Honor Magic 7 Lite’s impressive design and build quality, good-looking display, capable battery and generally smooth performance make for a solid everyday smartphone. Folks looking to save a bit of cash will find a lot to love about the Magic 7 Lite, as long as they keep their expectations in check. On the other hand the low-end chipset, pre-installed apps and overall camera performance might leave you wanting a little more, and people who prioritize these areas will have to spend a bit more to get the device they want. At the end of the day though it’s a solid phone that plays it safe without attempting to punch higher than its weight class.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 02-01-2025
Bron: Tech Spurt

This near 6.8-inch blower boasts a 6600mAh battery, one of the biggest of any mid-range mobile, with 66W wired charging. I've tested out the dual lens camera and here's some photo and video samples from my 24 hours of play time. And I've also wielded the Honor Magic 7 Lite during some Call of Duty action, to see if it will satisfy gamers. Spoiler: you've got the same Snapdragon here as the previous 6 Lite. Sadly it's old Android 14 and Magic OS 8 stashed on the Honor Magic 7 Lite straight out of the box. Here's hoping it's updated to the latest software soon. Still, at least you don't get many annoying apps pre-installed and that design is pleasingly skinny and light.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 02-01-2025
Bron: PC Welt

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 18-02-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Smartzone

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 13-02-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prestatie: 75% beeldscherm: 90% mobiliteit: 85% afwerking: 85%
Bron: Xataka

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 15-01-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 78% prestatie: 65% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 93% afwerking: 83%
Bron: Hipertextual

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 15-01-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: 4G News

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 08-02-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90%
Bron: Smart World

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 18-02-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 74% prijs: 60% functionaliteiten: 70% mobiliteit: 85% afwerking: 85% ergonomie: 85%
Bron: HDblog.it

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 23-01-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 75% functionaliteiten: 79%
Bron: Andrea Galeazzi

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 20-01-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prijs: 75% beeldscherm: 85% mobiliteit: 95% afwerking: 73%
Bron: DDay IT

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 17-01-2025
Bron: Igizmo

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 17-01-2025
Bron: Mister Gadget

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 15-01-2025
Bron: Evo smart

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 09-01-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 71% prijs: 60% prestatie: 60% beeldscherm: 70% mobiliteit: 90%
Bron: Techprincess IT

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 07-01-2025
Bron: Tutto Android

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 07-01-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: L' Eclaireur FNAC

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 28-01-2025
Bron: Presse Citron

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 28-01-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 84% prestatie: 75% beeldscherm: 95% mobiliteit: 95% afwerking: 95%
Bron: Les Mobiles

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 17-01-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Journal du Geek

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 13-01-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Les Numeriques

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 08-01-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prestatie: 60% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 100% afwerking: 80% ergonomie: 80%
Bron: 01Net

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 08-01-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70% prijs: 80% mobiliteit: 70%
Bron: Frandroid

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 08-01-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prestatie: 70% beeldscherm: 70% mobiliteit: 90% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Co Nowego

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 09-02-2025
Bron: Techno Senior

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 08-02-2025
Bron: Komputerswiat

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 28-01-2025
Bron: Telepolis

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 05-01-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: GSM Maniak

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 02-01-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 78% prestatie: 70% beeldscherm: 79% mobiliteit: 95%
Bron: GSM Online PL

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 02-01-2025
Bron: MobilArena HU

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 02-01-2025
Beoordeling: prijs: 60% beeldscherm: 90% mobiliteit: 100% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Mobilmania.cz

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 23-02-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Smartmania.cz

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 11-01-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 78% prestatie: 85% functionaliteiten: 75% mobiliteit: 98% afwerking: 81%
Bron: Mobility.bg

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 28-02-2025
Bron: Computerblog.ro

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 19-01-2025
Commentaar
Qualcomm Adreno 710:
De meeste niet-veeleisende huidige games kunnen vloeiend draaien. Wees voorbereid op verminderde grafische weergave door lage detailinstellingen en lage resoluties. Toch verschaffen deze kaarten voldoende prestatie voor kantoor taken en video bekijken (niet voor HD videos).
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Grafische Kaarten en de passende Benchmark Tabel.
SD 6 Gen 1: SoC voor het middensegment met 8 Kryo-kernen (4x ARM Cortex A78 2,2 GHz prestatiecluster, 4x ARM Cortex A55 met 1,8 efficiencycluster) en een X62 5G-modem (tot 2900 Mbps download). De chip is vervaardigd met behulp van het moderne 4nm-proces.
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Processors.
6.78": Er bestaan maar weinig smartphones met een groter scherm.
Grote schermformaten laten hogere resoluties toe. Details zoals letters zijn groter. Anderzijds is het energieverbruik lager bij kleine schermdiagonalen en de toestellen zijn kleiner, lichter en goedkoper.
>>Om de fijnheid van het scherm te vinden, kijk in onze DPI-lijst.
76.89%: Dit cijfer is niet echt overtuigend. Het moet in acht worden genomen dat er bijna geen laptops zijn die een score onder de 60% hebben. Dit notebook is beneden gemiddeld beoordeeld, en is niet aanbevolen te kopen.
>> De verdere informatie kan worden gevonden in onze hulp voor de aankoop van laptops.