Honor Magic6 Lite
Laptopspecificaties
Secundaire Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.45, Videos @1080p/30fps)
Price comparison
Gemiddelde van 36 score (van 56 beoordelingen)
Testrapporten voor de Honor Magic6 Lite
De Honor Magic6 Lite combineert de functies van een middenklasse telefoon met het ontwerp van een high-end toestel. In deze review van de Magic 6 Lite zult u zien of het concept van de Honor telefoon met zijn 120 Hz AMOLED-paneel werkt en of het een aankoop waard is.
Bron: GSM Choice EN→NL
To sum up, Honor Magic6 lite looks attractive in terms of design and offers a very good display. If you mainly care about the appearance of the phone and the quality of the screen, it is worth considering this model. Moreover, you shouldn't be disappointed with the phone's performance and communication functions. However, it is worth keeping in mind some disadvantages, such as the weak wide-angle camera and the inability to record 4K video with the selfie camera. Additionally, the lack of a charger in the box may be disappointing considering the price of the phone is around EUR 400. Overall, Honor Magic6 Lite 5G is perfect for people who use the main camera to take photos, appreciate the phone's aesthetics and high screen quality, and also need good communication features.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 31-05-2024
Bron: Irish Mirror EN→NL
The first phone I planned to review this year was this stunning sunrise orange Magic 6 Lite mid-range handset from Honor. It should have adorned this website the very first week in January, but thanks to the joys of Brexit, the device got stopped by customs, ended up back in London and eventually arrived in my hands safely towards the end of March. Headline features are a 108MP main camera and a large 5300mAh battery that should last most users two days.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 20-05-2024
Bron: Expert Reviews EN→NL
The wobbles in the camera department and mediocre performance take some of the shine off the Honor Magic 6 Lite but they aren’t drastic enough drawbacks to dull it completely. Even the limited software support, which is by far my strongest criticism, is ultimately overshadowed by the level of quality you’re getting for your money here. Battery life is terrific, the display is big, bright and beautifully represented and the design has a style well above its pay grade. Even the main camera, which is admittedly weighed down by lacklustre backing dancers, delivers effective improvements over its predecessor. For an affordable mid-range handset with the looks and stamina of a pricier phone, the Honor Magic 6 Lite is a real charmer.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 24-04-2024
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Root Nation EN→NL
After reviewing the HONOR Magic6 Lite, my feelings are mixed. Its predecessor, the Magic5 Lite, was not perfect either, but it was affordable, so the overall assessment was positive. However, by that time, it had been on the market for a while and had become cheaper. The Magic6 Lite is priced at around $360 – what do we get for this money? A powerful battery – yes. A vibrant and beautiful curved AMOLED display with 120Hz refresh rate – yes. The processor – overall okay. A slim body and a version with orange eco-leather – yes, cool. Well-optimized interface – probably, but with the old Android 13 and short support. So, here we started talking about the downsides. HONOR Magic6 LiteAnd there are enough downsides – the package is poor, there is no charger or case (competitors offer these for the same price).
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 23-03-2024
Beoordeling: Totale score: 78% prijs: 70% prestatie: 80% beeldscherm: 100% mobiliteit: 100% afwerking: 90% ergonomie: 90%
Bron: DxOMark EN→NL
Showing outstanding results in autonomy and discharge efficiency, the Honor Magic6 Lite (5800 mAh) has positioned itself among the top devices in our database, with a battery performance that came very close to matching the Magic6 series’ Pro model. As its name indicates, the Honor Magic6 Lite (5800 mAh) comes with a robust battery that is slightly bigger than the 5600 mAh in the Magic6 Pro, and considerably bigger than an earlier Magic6 Lite (5300 mAh) release. The Magic6 Lite (5800 mAh) showed an impressive battery life of more than three days when used moderately. Across various test cases, particularly in video streaming, idle screen-on, and music streaming under both Wi-Fi and 4G conditions, the Magic6 Lite (5800 mAh) also demonstrated exceptional autonomy.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 12-03-2024
Bron: Android Headlines EN→NL
Should you get the HONOR Magic6 Lite? Well, that’s a question only you can answer. But… if you have a limited budget, and this phone is in it, it’s worth considering, at the very least. There are a lot of upsides when it comes to the HONOR Magic6 Lite. This smartphone offers great design, and I’m not only talking about how it looks, but how it feels in the hand. It may be large, but it’s not heavy at all, and HONOR did an outstanding job with the shape of the device. There are no sharp edges or anything of the sort, not even close to it. On top of that, the HONOR Magic6 Lite has a great display. This is one of the best displays in this price range, without a doubt. The performance is also really good, and the battery life is great. Charging could be faster, but we do have to keep in mind what’s the price tag here. This phone’s weakest point is in the camera department.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 16-01-2024
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Trusted Reviews EN→NL
The Honor Magic 6 Lite offers a lot for its asking price, and the fact that it looks the part sweetens the deal further. You get more RAM and storage than most brands offer at this price point, a lovely display with high-frequency PWM dimming, a mammoth battery and a solid primary camera. It’s not perfect, though. The poor video performance and lacklustre auxiliary cameras are disappointing, and the same goes for the outdated operating system and slow charging speeds. Middle-of-the-road graphical performance will be a turn-off for keen gamers, too. If the camera performance is a high priority, you’ll have a better time with the Google Pixel 7a, which can be had for about £30 more at the time of writing. However, you won’t get quite such an impressive display, and you’ll be halving the storage. If display quality and battery life are high priorities, the Honor Magic 6 Lite is hard to beat at this price.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 11-01-2024
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: OI Spice Tech News EN→NL
The Honor Magic 6 Lite seems to have all the right specs needed to make a premium smartphone. It has a great design, display, chipset, camera, battery, and everything you could think of. And oh yes, it also has 5G connectivity. A complete premium package in itself. However, it is not a brand-new smartphone. It is a rebrand of the Honor X9b that was released not so long ago. This is not a bad thing. Look at it this way. If Honor Magic 6 Lite fails to launch or you are unable to get it in your region, you can just get the Honor X9b, which is the same. However, what if Honor smartphones are not available in your region at all? Then we have an alternative smartphone for you. The Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro is the one to go for if Honor smartphones are not your thing. It should be similar in terms of pricing while offering equal or better specs in many ways. However, the final decision is up to you, so it is better to choose a smartphone based on your requirements and needs.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 07-01-2024
Bron: Tech Spurt
Reviewing the Honor Magic 6 Lite, including an unboxing, camera test, gaming performance and battery life thoughts after a week of use. I've been testing the budget-friendly Honor Magic 6 Lite as my full-time phone for several days and yes, the software isn't great while the experience can be buggy. However, the battery life is sublime, you can game on Genshin Impact and that screen is a stunner. This smartphone can be yours from Jan 10th for a price of £349 UK. Those specs and the camera haven't massively changed vs the older 5 Lite, but Honor has boosted the battery size and no complaints on longevity. Although the charging speeds are now slower, bizarrely.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 06-01-2024
Bron: DxOMark EN→NL
The Honor Magic6 Lite (5300 mAh) battery placed high in our ranking thanks to its excellent performances in autonomy and efficiency. In terms of efficiency, the Honor Magic6 Lite demonstrated a low discharging current in all our test cases, especially in idle screen off and video streaming 4G. On the other hand, the powerful charger was not contributing in favor of overall charging efficiency. The overall charge-up efficiency was only 71.9%, which ranked in the bottom half of our database. When compared with devices from the same price range ($200 – $399), the Honor Magic6 Lite (5300 mAh) ranked behind its predecessor, the Magic5 Lite. The device had an outstanding showing in autonomy and efficiency.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 05-01-2024
Bron: Stuff Magazine EN→NL
The Magic 6 Lite isn’t an awful lot different from last year’s Magic 5 Lite – but seeing how that was quite the bargain, I don’t think that’s a bad thing in the slightest. Honor has refined what was already a rather sharp looking smartphone into something that could easily be mistaken for a much more expensive device. Battery life is exceptional for the cash, and that lead camera is impressively detailed. However, not changing things up also means a few returning issues. I still don’t see the point in adding a macro camera, Honor’s software update commitments are basic, and gaming still isn’t a strong point, even among affordable phones. And are curved edge screens really still the status symbol they once were, now Google and Samsung have ditched them from their flagships? That said, Honor has managed to avoid cost of living increases better than many rivals. The Magic 6 Lite is considerably cheaper than a Google Pixel 7a. That alone could still make it a great choice for anyone on a modest budget.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 05-01-2024
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: TechTablets
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 03-01-2024
Bron: Chinahandys.net DE→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 18-04-2024
Beoordeling: Totale score: 83% prestatie: 75% beeldscherm: 100% mobiliteit: 90% afwerking: 90%
Bron: PC Welt DE→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 20-01-2024
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Computerhoy ES→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 03-01-2024
Beoordeling: Totale score: 75%
Bron: Xataka ES→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 03-01-2024
Beoordeling: Totale score: 81% prestatie: 75% beeldscherm: 85% mobiliteit: 85% afwerking: 85%
Bron: Tuexperto ES→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 03-01-2024
Bron: El Español ES→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 03-01-2024
Bron: Hipertextual ES→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 03-01-2024
Bron: Tudo Celular PT→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 11-10-2024
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60% prijs: 50%
Bron: Canaltech PT→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 01-10-2024
Beoordeling: Totale score: 76% prestatie: 70% beeldscherm: 70% mobiliteit: 100% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Smart World IT→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 15-02-2024
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prijs: 75% functionaliteiten: 80% beeldscherm: 85% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 80% ergonomie: 80%
Bron: Smart World IT→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 15-02-2024
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prijs: 75% functionaliteiten: 80% beeldscherm: 85% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 80% ergonomie: 80%
Bron: Igizmo IT→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 20-01-2024
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90%
Bron: Mister Gadget IT→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 08-01-2024
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Batista70Phone IT→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 03-01-2024
Beoordeling: Totale score: 85% functionaliteiten: 80% beeldscherm: 90% mobiliteit: 95% afwerking: 85% ergonomie: 85%
Bron: Evo smart IT→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 02-01-2024
Beoordeling: Totale score: 82% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 90%
Bron: Techprincess IT IT→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 02-01-2024
Bron: HDblog.it IT→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 02-01-2024
Beoordeling: prijs: 81% functionaliteiten: 82%
Bron: Quotidiano Hardware Upgrade IT→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 02-01-2023
Bron: Andrea Galeazzi IT→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 02-01-2023
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prijs: 80% beeldscherm: 85% mobiliteit: 95% afwerking: 87%
Bron: 01Net FR→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 17-10-2024
Beoordeling: Totale score: 72% mobiliteit: 80%
Bron: Les Mobiles FR→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 04-02-2024
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Android MT FR→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 29-01-2024
Beoordeling: Totale score: 78% prijs: 70% prestatie: 80% beeldscherm: 90% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 90%
Bron: Les Mobiles FR→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 19-01-2024
Beoordeling: Totale score: 100%
Bron: Clubic FR→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 17-01-2024
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prestatie: 80% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 100% afwerking: 90%
Bron: Les Numeriques FR→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 16-01-2024
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60% prestatie: 80% beeldscherm: 100% mobiliteit: 100% afwerking: 60% ergonomie: 60%
Bron: Nerd-mobile FR→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 13-01-2024
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prestatie: 80% beeldscherm: 100% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 90%
Bron: L' Eclaireur FNAC FR→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 10-01-2024
Bron: 01Net FR→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 10-01-2024
Beoordeling: Totale score: 82% mobiliteit: 100%
Bron: Frandroid FR→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 10-01-2024
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70% prestatie: 70% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Journal du Geek FR→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 10-01-2024
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: m GSM PL→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 02-04-2024
Bron: Android.com.pl PL→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 19-03-2024
Beoordeling: Totale score: 73% prestatie: 70% beeldscherm: 90% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 80%
Bron: GSM Online PL→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 19-03-2024
Bron: Geex X-kom PL→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 26-02-2024
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Techno Senior PL→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 25-02-2024
Bron: Tabletowo PL→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 29-01-2024
Beoordeling: Totale score: 63%
Bron: Telepolis PL→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 29-01-2024
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Unite4buy PL→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 06-12-2023
Bron: DGL.ru RU→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 22-01-2024
Beoordeling: prestatie: 80% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 80%
Bron: MobilArena HU HU→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 05-01-2024
Beoordeling: prijs: 40% beeldscherm: 90% mobiliteit: 90% afwerking: 80%
Bron: CNews.cz CZ→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 12-02-2024
Bron: Smartmania.cz CZ→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 24-01-2024
Beoordeling: Totale score: 84% prestatie: 84% functionaliteiten: 79% mobiliteit: 94% afwerking: 87%
Bron: Root Nation CN zh-CN→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 21-03-2024
Beoordeling: Totale score: 78% prijs: 70% beeldscherm: 100% mobiliteit: 100% afwerking: 90% ergonomie: 90%
Bron: Tek.no NO→NL
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 23-08-2024
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Commentaar
Qualcomm Adreno 710:
De meeste niet-veeleisende huidige games kunnen vloeiend draaien. Wees voorbereid op verminderde grafische weergave door lage detailinstellingen en lage resoluties. Toch verschaffen deze kaarten voldoende prestatie voor kantoor taken en video bekijken (niet voor HD videos).
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Grafische Kaarten en de passende Benchmark Tabel.
SD 6 Gen 1: SoC voor het middensegment met 8 Kryo-kernen (4x ARM Cortex A78 2,2 GHz prestatiecluster, 4x ARM Cortex A55 met 1,8 efficiencycluster) en een X62 5G-modem (tot 2900 Mbps download). De chip is vervaardigd met behulp van het moderne 4nm-proces.
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Processors.
6.78": Er bestaan maar weinig smartphones met een groter scherm.
Grote schermformaten laten hogere resoluties toe. Details zoals letters zijn groter. Anderzijds is het energieverbruik lager bij kleine schermdiagonalen en de toestellen zijn kleiner, lichter en goedkoper.
>>Om de fijnheid van het scherm te vinden, kijk in onze DPI-lijst.
77.89%: Dit cijfer is niet echt overtuigend. Het moet in acht worden genomen dat er bijna geen laptops zijn die een score onder de 60% hebben. Dit notebook is beneden gemiddeld beoordeeld, en is niet aanbevolen te kopen.
>> De verdere informatie kan worden gevonden in onze hulp voor de aankoop van laptops.