Honor 5C
Laptopspecificaties
Secundaire Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0
Price comparison
Gemiddelde van 27 score (van 52 beoordelingen)
Testrapporten voor de Honor 5C
Wat een eer. Een subliem beeldscherm en fatsoenlijke camera omvat in een metalen behuizing - met een prijs van minder dan 200 EUR (~$223). De Honor 5C maakt een grote indruk. Dit testrapport onthult of the 5.2-inch smartphone echt zo fantastisch is.
Bron: Gadgetspeak EN→NL Archive.org version
As with all modern phones it has front and back cameras the front often called a Selfie camera is a respectable 8MP while the rear camera is mounted 1.5cm down from the top of the back and has an LED flash by its side. The camera resolution is 13MP and takes good images but not up to the superb standard of the Huawei P9 but then the unit costs only 1/3 of the price.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 05-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prijs: 80% prestatie: 80% functionaliteiten: 80% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Techradar EN→NL Archive.org version
If you're looking for a phone with a bit of high-end flavour on a super-tight budget, the Honor 5C is an excellent choice. As long as you don't mind the Honor software approach, there's nothing major to complain about here. The main consideration is whether you might prefer the Moto G4, which costs £20 more but has a bigger screen, and a very pure take on Android.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 27-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: KL Gadget Guy EN→NL Archive.org version
For RM799, the Honor 5C is a perfectly decent mid-range smartphone that does almost everything you need out of it. However, the problem the Honor 5C has is that its just not that interesting as a whole. There are no particularly standout features about the phone that makes the Honor 5C a must buy, and in a market that is highly saturated, the Honor 5C could potentially be lost in the shuffle.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 14-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 74% prijs: 80% prestatie: 70% functionaliteiten: 60% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Gadgetspeak EN→NL Archive.org version
The Honor 5C’s performance is more than adequate especially when compared against similarly priced handsets. Loading apps and scrolling through images and websites was fine although I would have preferred more of a reluctance of the screen to gather finger smears.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 20-08-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90% prijs: 100% prestatie: 100%
Bron: Cool Smartphone EN→NL Archive.org version
I was a bit worried taking a punt on this device. I normally recommend a Moto G for people in this segment and had the G4 been smaller, I would’ve bought that for my mother without any hesitation. But this phone really surprised me. Frankly this is the best budget phone on the market now. Sure, as a phone-nerd it doesnt have the features and power that I want for all the things I do with my phone. But for a lot of people, it really is all the phone they’d ever need. Everyday tasks are done easily with good performance, a good screen, good battery life, decent camera and a surprisingly enjoyable software experience.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 17-08-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 87% mobiliteit: 93% afwerking: 87%
Bron: Android Central EN→NL Archive.org version
Nevertheless, the Honor 5C is a decent entry-level phone with a few standout features — solid, multi-day battery life, a touch of class with that metal back panel, expandable storage and easy dual-SIM connectivity. And if you're looking for an affordable Android phone which covers all the major bases, it's definitely worth a look.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 08-08-2016
Bron: Expert Reviews EN→NL Archive.org version
The Honor 5C excels when it comes to speed, but fails to excel in any other regard. Even its camera, which is arguably the phone's only other strong suit, is rather hit and miss depending on lighting conditions. The biggest issue here, though, is the quality of the competition. When you consider that the Moto G4 costs just £20 more yet comes with a better screen, longer-lasting battery and vastly superior build quality, the Honor 5C simply can't compete.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 03-08-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Think Digit EN→NL Archive.org version
The Honor 5C is a good smartphone that gets a lot right, but unfortunately, does not really have anything that sets it apart in competition. It offers good performance, camera, ergonomics, battery life, and is an overall pleasant device. The lack of frills make it a very simple, easy to use and convenient device, and is worthy of being considered at Rs. 10,999.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 10-07-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 76%
Bron: Techtree.com EN→NL Archive.org version
Despite quite a lot being written about the 13MP and 8MP cameras on the 5C, I found them a bit wanting. They do both shoot video at 1080p, and there's anF2.0 aperture and 78° wide-angle 5-element (5P) macro lens, but I found photos ready to pixelate under many conditions. Image reproduction was good, but the fuzziness and noise set the camera at standard average budget for me. The camera app, on the other hand, is rather nice and easy to use.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 07-07-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Tech2.in.com EN→NL Archive.org version
The Honor 5C offers a blend of good design, appealing UI and a capable hardware. It is definitely a good update over its predecessor, the Honor 4C, and feels as good as the Honor 5X. There are minor software issues but nothing that a quick update can’t fix. Having said that, the smartphone doesn’t offer anything unique or a differentiating factor that would set it apart from the competition. It’s a plain Jane phone which will struggle to survive in the market. The only reason one might just go for the Honor 5C is for its smaller display, as there are some consumers who don’t want to go beyond the 5.0-5.2 inch screen size.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 07-07-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70% prestatie: 70% functionaliteiten: 70% beeldscherm: 65% mobiliteit: 70% afwerking: 70%
Bron: Recombu EN→NL Archive.org version
The Honor 5C presents itself as an unassuming, middling Android handset, but you’ll quickly realise that it’s full of surprises. Great performance, battery life and cameras elevated the 5C above our expectations and at £149 it undercuts other top affordable offerings like the new Moto G4 giving it a serious edge.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 05-07-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 100%
Bron: Androidbeat EN→NL Archive.org version
The Honor 5c is Huawei’s second entrant into the rapidly growing sub-15k smartphone segment in India. The handset does a lot of things right that the Honor 5x got wrong – especially with respect to software and performance. However, I cannot help but feel that Honor/Huawei should have also launched a 32GB/3GB RAM variant of the 5c at a slightly higher price as it would have then better sufficed the needs of customers who want a phone with dual-SIM capabilities. The sub-par GPU and multitasking performance also immediately rule out the phone for any power user.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 30-06-2016
Bron: Tech Critter EN→NL Archive.org version
Apart from the SoC efficiency, the battery life is also affected by the smart app & battery management under EMUI and they're not so smart if you left it in default. The OS would automatically choose which app is more critical and set it as "protected" app which allows it to run after the screen is turned off.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 23-06-2016
Bron: V3.co.uk EN→NL Archive.org version
The Honor 5C is a mid-tier phone through and through. If we cast our minds back to 2013 we could almost say the same of the iPhone 5C. It was placed just below the more powerful 5S, and both served as updates to the ageing iPhone 5. Ultimately, either would make a great second, standby handset. The choice might be easier to make if you're tied to one ecosystem, but if we have one concern it would be the age of the iPhone 5C.
Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 22-06-2016
Bron: NDTV Gadgets EN→NL Archive.org version
The Honor 5C improves ever so slightly on its predecessor, thanks to a more capable SoC and small improvements to the camera. The design and build have also been bettered, and Android Marshmallow adds a few features and tweaks to the software. There isn't much to complain about here, especially at this price. Unfortunately, the 5C still lacks any wow factor. Nothing in the phone stands out, and this is in all ways an average phone that does what it does capably, but not exceptionally well. The pricing is competitive, but a lower price would have suited this phone much more. Buyers are likely to prefer other products in the same price range, such as the Redmi Note 3 or Lenovo Zuk Z1.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 22-06-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70% prijs: 70% prestatie: 70% beeldscherm: 70% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 70%
Bron: Trusted Reviews EN→NL Archive.org version
The Honor 5C is undeniably excellent value for money as a piece of hardware. It has internal specs that match, if not beat, the Moto G4's. But its use of Huawei’s Emotion skin will be a sticking point for many buyers. I can’t help but feel Honor should follow Motorola’s example and load its handsets with an unskinned version of Android.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 20-06-2016
Bron: Stuff TV EN→NL Archive.org version
The Honor 5C looks set to be a cracking deal for £150, falling in between the £116 Vodafone Ultra 6 and £170 Moto G4. With a metal build, G4-matching specs, and a price that won’t destroy your wallet, Honor could have a real winner on its hands here. Stay tuned for our full review, to see if we’ll be crowning it our new budget smartphone champion.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 20-06-2016
Bron: Pocket Lint EN→NL Archive.org version
For the low asking price of £149, you really do get quite a lot of phone for your money in the Honor 5C. That's the aim of Honor - giving good value for money without making too many compromises. The only real omission on the spec sheet is the lack of a fingerprint scanner. With most devices offering this technology, both in the top and mid ranges, it would have been more appealing if that had been offered.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 20-06-2016
Bron: Computer Magazin - 01/2017
Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 01-01-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 93%
Bron: Area DVD DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 17-10-2016
Bron: eTest DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 09-09-2016
Bron: Connect - Heft 9/2016
Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 01-08-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 82%
Bron: Android Pit DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 01-08-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Inside Handy DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 22-07-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Billiger-telefonieren.de DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 20-07-2016
Bron: Computerbild - Heft 15/2016
Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 15-07-2016
Bron: Tech Stage DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 15-07-2016
Bron: Verivox DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 12-07-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70% prijs: 60%
Bron: Honor News Blog DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 09-07-2016
Bron: Ubergismo Deutsch DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 07-07-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90%
Bron: PC Welt DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 06-07-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 92% prestatie: 93% functionaliteiten: 94% beeldscherm: 91% mobiliteit: 98%
Bron: Allround-PC.com DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 01-07-2016
Bron: Netzwelt DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 27-06-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 85% functionaliteiten: 100% mobiliteit: 70% afwerking: 100%
Bron: Notebooksbilliger Blog DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 27-06-2016
Bron: Turn On DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 24-06-2016
Bron: Curved DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 24-06-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prestatie: 79% beeldscherm: 83% mobiliteit: 79%
Bron: n-tv DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 21-06-2016
Bron: Golem DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 20-06-2016
Bron: WinFuture DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 20-06-2016
Bron: WinFuture DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 13-06-2016
Bron: Android Pit - Heft 7/2016
Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 01-06-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 11-01-2017
Bron: InstaNews IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 02-12-2016
Bron: Smartphone Italia IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 05-10-2016
Beoordeling: prijs: 90% functionaliteiten: 80% beeldscherm: 70% mobiliteit: 80% ergonomie: 80%
Bron: Tecno Cino IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 25-08-2016
Bron: AndroidWorld.it IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 24-08-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 86% prijs: 85% beeldscherm: 80% ergonomie: 80%
Bron: AndroidPit.it IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 28-07-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Top for Phone FR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 01-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prestatie: 70%
Bron: Clubic FR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 14-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90% mobiliteit: 90% afwerking: 80% ergonomie: 80%
Bron: Phonandroid FR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 01-09-2016
Bron: Product Test RU→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 15-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 79%
Commentaar
ARM Mali-T830 MP2:
Alleen oudere games kunnen vloeiend draaien met deze grafische chips (als ze niet veeleisend zijn). Gedeeld geheugen grafische cores in deze categorie hebben het voordeel van minder warmte-ontwikkeling en langere batterijlooptijd. Voor kantoor, internet, beeldcorrectie- en videomonteringswerk zijn deze grafische chips nog steeds bruikbaar zonder enige beperkingen.
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Grafische Kaarten en de passende Benchmark Tabel.
Kirin 650:
ARM-gebaseerde octa-core-SoC (8x Cortex-A53). Vier cores kunnen geklokt worden aan max. 1.7 GHz (energiezuinige cores) en vier andere aan max. 2 GHz (performante cores). De SoC beschikt ook over een Mali-T830 MP2-GPU en een LTE-radio.
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Processors.
5.20": Dit scherm is al redelijk groot voor een smartphone, maar wordt veelvuldig toegepast.
Grote schermformaten laten hogere resoluties toe. Details zoals letters zijn groter. Anderzijds is het energieverbruik lager bij kleine schermdiagonalen en de toestellen zijn kleiner, lichter en goedkoper.
>>Om de fijnheid van het scherm te vinden, kijk in onze DPI-lijst.
79.93%: Dit cijfer is niet echt overtuigend. Het moet in acht worden genomen dat er bijna geen laptops zijn die een score onder de 60% hebben. Dit notebook is beneden gemiddeld beoordeeld, en is niet aanbevolen te kopen.
>> De verdere informatie kan worden gevonden in onze hulp voor de aankoop van laptops.