HTC Bolt
Laptopspecificaties
Secundaire Camera: 8 MPix
Price comparison
Gemiddelde van 5 score (van 10 beoordelingen)
Testrapporten voor de HTC Bolt
Bron: Tom's Guide EN→NL Archive.org version
The Bolt is a maddening phone. It has fantastic highs, including amazing audio and a slick, but sturdy, water-resistant aluminum body. But subpar battery life and dated specs mean that while the Bolt might have strong network speeds, it's not any faster than flagships from Samsung, Google, LG and others.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 30-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Phone Arena EN→NL Archive.org version
The HTC Bolt is a well-intending smartphone that arrives hampered by more than a few problems. The handset design is quite nice, and it's great to see HTC keep its classy metal look while upgrading water-resistance. We like the display, the included headphones sound really good (after calibration), and data storage isn't a problem. And while the camera isn't really spectacular, it's not a mess, either, and is capable of generating some decent images.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 23-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Android Central EN→NL Archive.org version
In the HTC Bolt you get a stylish smartphone and a solid performer with the latest software. But with its aging spec offerings and a couple odd decisions, it costs just a little too much to consider adopting "Sprint's fastest smartphone ever."
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 18-11-2016
Bron: PC Mag EN→NL Archive.org version
For $600, the HTC Bolt has an attractive metal build, high-fidelity audio, and recent Android software. But the headphone hoopla is a bummer, as is the dated processor and the bloatware. If you're willing to pay $170 more, the Editors' Choice Google Pixel XL has a more powerful processor, no carrier bloatware, and 24/7 live support. If you're more comfortable staying in the $600 range, the HTC 10 is also and Editors' Choice and will still get you a more powerful processor, as well as a headphone jack with a 1-volt amp, sparing you from the brave new world of proprietary dongles.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 16-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: PC Mag EN→NL Archive.org version
For $600, the HTC Bolt has an attractive metal build, high-fidelity audio, and recent Android software. But the headphone hoopla is a bummer, as is the dated processor and the bloatware. If you're willing to pay $170 more, the Editors' Choice Google Pixel XL has a more powerful processor, no carrier bloatware, and 24/7 live support. If you're more comfortable staying in the $600 range, the HTC 10 is also and Editors' Choice and will still get you a more powerful processor, as well as a headphone jack with a 1-volt amp, sparing you from the brave new world of proprietary dongles.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 15-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: GSM Arena EN→NL Archive.org version
Our initial impressions of the camera are good, but we haven't tested low-light performance on it, so we'll reserve our final judgment on the image quality until then (there's also the lack of video stabilization in 1080p non-Hi-Res audio mode). But with the Bolt's outdated CPU and gobs of pre-loaded bloatware, this HTC-Sprint exclusive phone may have a hard time luring in customers from other carriers, especially with a price of $599.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 11-11-2016
Bron: Digital Trends EN→NL Archive.org version
No. The HTC Bolt is priced far too high for the experience it ultimately delivers. There are better options at slightly higher price points, and even better options at far lower prices. Unless you live in a market where Sprint’s deployed LTE Plus or have a hankering for “sonic” audio, you’d be better off spending your $600 elsewhere.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 10-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 40%
Bron: Smartphone e tablet android IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 28-12-2016
Beoordeling: prestatie: 80% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 70%
Bron: Giz Blog IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 07-11-2016
Bron: Teknolojioku TR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 11-11-2016
Commentaar
Qualcomm Adreno 430:
De meeste niet-veeleisende huidige games kunnen vloeiend draaien. Wees voorbereid op verminderde grafische weergave door lage detailinstellingen en lage resoluties. Toch verschaffen deze kaarten voldoende prestatie voor kantoor taken en video bekijken (niet voor HD videos).
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Grafische Kaarten en de passende Benchmark Tabel.
810 MSM8994:
High-end ARM-SoC met 8 CPU cores (4 x Cortex-A57 en 4 x Cortex-A53) en een Adreno 430 GPU. Gefabriceerd in een 20nm-HPM-proces.
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Processors.
5.50": Dit scherm is al redelijk groot voor een smartphone, maar wordt veelvuldig toegepast.
Grote schermformaten laten hogere resoluties toe. Details zoals letters zijn groter. Anderzijds is het energieverbruik lager bij kleine schermdiagonalen en de toestellen zijn kleiner, lichter en goedkoper.
>>Om de fijnheid van het scherm te vinden, kijk in onze DPI-lijst.
58%: Zulke slechte cijfers zijn zeldzaam. Er zijn bijna geen notebooks die slechtere cijfers hebben gekregen.
>> De verdere informatie kan worden gevonden in onze hulp voor de aankoop van laptops.