Notebookcheck Logo

Coolpad Mega 2.5D

Laptopspecificaties

Coolpad Mega 2.5D
Coolpad Mega 2.5D (Mega Serie)
Processor
Mediatek MT6735 4 x 1.5 GHz, Cortex-A53
Grafische kaart
ARM Mali-T720
Geheugen
3 GB 
Beeldscherm
5.50 inch 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 267 PPI, IPS, 2.5D curved glass, glimmend: ja
Opslag
16GB/32GB
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 7.85 x 153 x 76.8
Batterij
2500 mAh
Besturingssysteem
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primaire camera: 8 MPix LED Flash, SONY sensor, f/2.2 aperture
Secundaire Camera: 8 MPix 83.6-degrees wide-angle lens, f/2.2 Aperture
Gewicht
143 g
Prijs
100 Euro

 

Price comparison

Gemiddelde Score: 71.5% - gemiddeld
Gemiddelde van 2 score (van 9 beoordelingen)
prijs: 70%, prestatie: 65%, functionaliteiten: - %, beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 70%, afwerking: 85%, ergonomie: - %, emissies: - %

Testrapporten voor de Coolpad Mega 2.5D

70% Coolpad mega 2.5D Review – The curved screen Rs.7000 device
Bron: Tech Magnifier Engels EN→NL Archive.org version
Indeed the device look premium and beautiful, the screen is smooth and nice however the back is made up of average quality material. It’s a uni-body design and you need both the hands to use it. Battery life is decent and could last a day or more in average usage. However, in the same price range you can get a better choice from Lenovo, the Vibe K5 Plus or Redmi 3s from Mi.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 27-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Coolpad Mega 2.5D Review: Great Looks Marred by Performance
Bron: Tech PP Engels EN→NL Archive.org version
Coolpad’s intentions are good to bring a phone with good build and design that doesn’t look cheap, doesn’t compromise on some basic sensors, and available at a very affordable price. And they’ve done it, but not without sacrificing the engines that power the phone. The poor choice of processor and hence its clock speeds cannot be overseen just by throwing in a 3GB of RAM. You’d notice the lack of good touch sensitivity the instant you pick the phone and start using. Gaming and camera too aren’t good in their overall performance though the UI has some good options up its sleeves.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 24-09-2016
73% Coolpad Mega 2.5D Review
Bron: Techniqued Engels EN→NL Archive.org version
Priced at Rs 6,999, the Coolpad Mega 2.5D offers quite good value for money with stylish design and looks and latest software. But the real problems for Coolpad Mega 2.5D is the average performance, camera, and not so great battery life. The Redmi 3S which is again priced Rs 6,999 definitely offers better value for money. But if you are looking for a large screen budget offering, Coolpad Mega 2.5D is definitely a good buy.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 01-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 73% prijs: 70% prestatie: 65% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 70% afwerking: 85%
Coolpad Mega 2.5D review – quad core 4G VoLTE ready
Bron: Gogi.in Engels EN→NL Archive.org version
The Coolpad Mega 2.5D could have been a good handset for Rs. 6,999 had the Redmi 3S not been launched, unfortunately for the price the Redmi 3S is no doubt a much better option.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 01-09-2016
Coolpad Mega 2.5D Review - Meet the Redmi 3S alternative
Bron: The Mobile Indian Engels EN→NL Archive.org version
To sum up, we would suggest you to consider the Coolpad Mega if you are not looking for a small phone like Xiaomi Redmi 3S which we reviewed recently. The Coolpad Mega won't disappoint you at Rs 6,999.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 31-08-2016
Coolpad Mega 2.5D Review
Bron: Fone Arena Engels EN→NL Archive.org version
Coolpad is also playing with feature sets to make them appealing to specific audiences, the selfie loving millennials being that in the case of the Mega 2.5D. Yes, performance does seem to have taken a back seat for the brand but not to a degree that would impede even casual use. At a price point of Rs. 6,999, the Coolpad Mega 2.5D is certainly worth taking a look at the next time you’re in the market for a new handset.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 26-08-2016
Coolpad Mega 2.5D Hands-on and Images
Bron: Mobygyaan Engels EN→NL Archive.org version
Coolpad Mega 2.5D will be available at a price of ₹6,999 on a first flash sale via Amazon India. What we’ll miss in this phone will be the amazing fingerprint scanner other Coolpad phones offer and a larger battery capacity. The good thing is it comes with a classy look and a newer CoolUI 8.0. Coolpad Mega 2.5D comes with an updated CoolUI 8.0 based on Android 6.0 Marshmallow while other Coolpad phones remain behind in terms of the software.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 25-08-2016
The selfie obsessed get an edge
Bron: The Indian Express Engels EN→NL Archive.org version
Selfie obsession is fine, and Coolpad Mega 2.5 manages to have a slight edge on the front for this price point. But for an overall performance, my bet is still the Redmi 3s because of the battery, which I think is a feature you can’t overlook when choosing a smartphone.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 24-08-2016
Coolpad Mega 2.5D Review – Best Budget Smartphone?
Bron: Gadget Diary Engels EN→NL Archive.org version
The phone has a MediaTek MT6573P processor which is a 1 Ghz quad-core chip and it is coupled with 3GB of RAM. Now, you cannot expect some top level performance with this thing, but as a normal day to day phone, this is a great phone to use. It might not be the most powerful phone in the market but we didn’t face lag while navigating through the interface of while opening or closing the applications.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 15-08-2016

Commentaar

ARM Mali-T720:

Deze grafische kaarten voor notebooks zijn niet bruikbaar voor games. Als ze al games kunnen draaien, dan doen ze dat met grafische afwijkingen en heel lage framesnelheid. Voor gamers zijn deze chips ongeschikt! Kantoor en internet taken zijn, daarentegen, geen probleem voor deze GPUs.


>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Grafische Kaarten en de passende Benchmark Tabel.


MT6735:

Een 64-bit quad-core-SoC (4x ARM Cortex-A53) geklokt aan max. 1.5 Ghz en bedoeld voor goedkope tablets en smartphones.


>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Processors.


5.50": Dit scherm is al redelijk groot voor een smartphone, maar wordt veelvuldig toegepast.

Grote schermformaten laten hogere resoluties toe. Details zoals letters zijn groter. Anderzijds is het energieverbruik lager bij kleine schermdiagonalen en de toestellen zijn kleiner, lichter en goedkoper.
>>Om de fijnheid van het scherm te vinden, kijk in onze DPI-lijst.


71.5%: Dit cijfer is slecht. De meeste notebooks hebben een hoger cijfer. Dit is niet aanbevolen bij aankoop.


>> De verdere informatie kan worden gevonden in onze hulp voor de aankoop van laptops.

 

Please share our article, every link counts!

Vergelijkbare notebooks van een andere fabrikant

Lenovo A7700
Mali-T720
BQ BQS 5515
Mali-T720
Zopo Color F2
Mali-T720
Doogee X6 Pro
Mali-T720

Laptops van een andere fabrikant en met een andere CPU

Wiko UPulse
Mali-T720, unknown
Archos 55 Helium Ultra
Mali-T720, Mediatek MT6737
Oukitel U20 Plus
Mali-T720, Mediatek MT6737
Bluboo Edge
Mali-T720, Mediatek MT6737
Bluboo Dual
Mali-T720, Mediatek MT6737
Doogee T6 Pro
Mali-T720, Mediatek MT6753
Oukitel U7 Plus
Mali-T720, Mediatek MT6737

Laptops met dezelfde grafische kaart

Doro 8020X
Mali-T720, Mediatek MT6735M, 4.50", 0.185 kg
Coolpad Note 5 Lite C
Mali-T720, Mediatek MT6735M, 5.00", 0.148 kg
Wiko Harry
Mali-T720, Mediatek MT6735, 5.00", 0.16 kg
Alcatel Pixi 4 (5)
Mali-T720, Mediatek MT6735M, 5.00", 0.148 kg
Panasonic Eluga I3 Mega
Mali-T720, Mediatek MT6735, 5.00", 0.18 kg
Blackview A9 Pro
Mali-T720, Mediatek MT6737, 5.00", 0.17 kg
Lenovo Moto C
Mali-T720, Mediatek MT6737, 5.00", 0.154 kg
Panasonic P77
Mali-T720, Mediatek MT6735P, 5.00", 0.126 kg
Oukitel C5 Pro
Mali-T720, Mediatek MT6737, 5.00", 0.165 kg
Nokia 3
Mali-T720, Mediatek MT6737, 5.00", 0.141 kg
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Mali-T720, Exynos Exynos 7570, 5.00", 0.172 kg
Lenovo Vibe B
Mali-T720, Mediatek MT6735M, 4.50", 0.144 kg
ZTE Blade V6 Plus
Mali-T720, Mediatek MT6735, 5.00", 0.135 kg
BQ BQ-5032 Element
Mali-T720, Mediatek MT6735, 5.00", 0.144 kg
Lenovo Phab 2
Mali-T720, Mediatek MT8735, 6.40", 0.225 kg
Prijsvergelijking
Stefan Hinum (Update: 2016-09-19)