Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
Laptopspecificaties
Secundaire Camera: 5 MPix
Price comparison
Gemiddelde van 35 score (van 70 beoordelingen)
Testrapporten voor de Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
Lange batterijlevensduur, beperkte prestaties. Asus' Zenfone 3 Max wil indruk maken met zijn grote capaciteit batterij en voldoen aan de vraag van accu-junkies. Gebruikers zullen echter op andere vlakken compromissen moeten sluiten, zoals in onze tests naar voren komt.
Bron: Nieuwe Mobiel.nl Archive.org version
Onze eerste kennismaking met een Asus Zenfone is geen basis voor een geslaagde voortzetting van de relatie. Het nette ontwerp van het toestel en zijn, zoals verwacht mocht worden, goede accuduur worden links en recht in de steek gelaten door zwakke hardware en omslachtige en slecht uitgewerkte software. Natuurlijk kan op Android de software in grote mate aan persoonlijke voorkeuren worden aangepast maar op de Max vergt dat wel wat ervaring en moeite. Bovendien wordt daarmee de teleurstellende hardware nog niet gecorrigeerd.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 03-05-2017
Anderstalige testrapporten
Bron: Toptenreviews EN→NL Archive.org version
At this price point, it holds up well for daily usage. Great for worry free travels for the casual traveller.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 03-04-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Laptop Media EN→NL Archive.org version
As we expected, the available 4130mAh battery is Zenfone 3 Max’s key advantage in its battle with the competitive models in this price range. Apart from ensuring high durability, it is also complemented by several battery saving modes which can significantly increase battery life between separate charges. They are part of the feature-rich Zen user interface by ASUS which complements the Android 6.0 Marshmallow OS in the best possible way. Additionally, you get an HD display which ensures good enough image detail plus high brightness levels allowing easy use when outdoors.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 24-01-2017
Bron: PC Quest EN→NL Archive.org version
Bottomline: If you’re looking for a great battery phone but don’t want to carry weight, then this is the right device with good overall performance, but a bit expensive. So, if you are ready to spend 18k then it’s a perfect choice.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 02-12-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 100% prijs: 90% prestatie: 100%
Bron: Unbox EN→NL Archive.org version
If you’re looking to grab a member of the ASUS ZF3 family and have limited funds, then you can’t do any better than the 5.5-inch version of the ZF3 Max. It has many of the same features that both the ZF3 Laser and the smaller ZF3 Max have – big battery, fast performance and insane battery life – at a price that’s hard to beat.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 30-11-2016
Bron: Yugatech EN→NL Archive.org version
The Asus Zenfone 3 Max 5.5 (ZC553KL) is yet another quality smartphone from Asus. Although, it’s already above the Php10k mark making it a bit difficult to suggest among budget consumers who prefers long battery life. At Php10,995, it’s a good balance for what you’re getting and this makes it the second cheapest Zenfone 3 member you can purchase.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 30-11-2016
Bron: Mobygyaan EN→NL Archive.org version
People already wants a phone with longer battery life and you are the one, consider it if you like the brand value. There are some alternatives to it like the Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 which also comes to play when it’s a showdown for the battery runtime, but only if you want a phone without a recognized brand and yes, the camera of course. Even though its smaller sized form factor, I like the design, the camera, and its battery life. What I would expect here would be a better CPU at this price range. Overall, the long battery run is a deal breaker. Not to mention it can charge other phones, consider it also as a 4,100 mAh pocket power bank.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 26-11-2016
Bron: Mobile and Apps EN→NL Archive.org version
If you need a smartphone that packs a great battery, you might need to look at the Asus ZenFone 3 Max. It is one of the many phones that Asus has released in its lineup and promises steady performance on the user end.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 24-11-2016
Bron: Unbox EN→NL Archive.org version
The only thing missing now is price – there’s no pricing for the 5.5-inch ZF3 Max in the Philippines yet unfortunately, but if India pricing is anything to go by, it’ll probably retail close to the SRP of the Zenfone 3 Laser. That’s why we think that ASUS may discontinue the ZF3 Laser, since their prices are so close to each other anyway. The 5.5 ZF3 Max having an almost identical feature set with the ZF3 Laser means that the two phones will cannibalize each other in the market if they’re both available.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 22-11-2016
Bron: Tech Magnifier EN→NL Archive.org version
The Asus Zenfone 3 Max impresses when it comes to gaming performance, video playback and battery backup. The battery lasts more than a day in average usage and about a day in heavy usage. The screen is visible in direct sunlight and color is rendering is also appropriate. But considering the price there are better options available such as Le eco Le Max 2, One plus 3 and Mi Max Prime.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 17-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Gogi.in EN→NL Archive.org version
The Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL is a good handset, quad core but quite powerful and heat up is under control. Battery life is very good. Handset has got a premium feel and the price is on the higher side. I was expecting it to be somewhere under Rs. 10,000.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 11-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 76%
Bron: The Indian Express EN→NL Archive.org version
Yes, if your pain-point is battery and you just need good performance overall on other fronts, then this is among the best bets in the market at the moment. Given the price, the Asus ZenFone 3 Max seems good value for money given that it offers a dependable piece of hardware that will keep most users happy.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 11-11-2016
Bron: Mobygyaan EN→NL Archive.org version
Given that the hardware is relatively low powered along with the display, the 4,100 mAh battery should offer a plenty of uptime. It is priced at ₹12,999 and available on online and offline stores.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 10-11-2016
Bron: Gadgets Now EN→NL Archive.org version
The Asus Zenfone 3 Max is no doubt one of the best handsets in the particular series I've come across so far. It has a huge battery capacity of 4100mAh, which is not the highest but good enough to keep the device running for over a full day of use. There are other battery-focussed handsets too in the market but are priced higher.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 10-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Tech2.in.com EN→NL Archive.org version
I can’t for the life of me figure out why Asus has priced the ZenFone 3 Max as they did. I appreciate the battery life and the build quality at this asking price of Rs 17,999, but that sluggish SoC completely ruins the experience for me. The camera is also lack-lustre. The elephant in the room is, of course, the Redmi Note 3, and that device sells for about Rs 5,000 to Rs 7,000 less than the ZenFone 3 Max. It also offers a massive performance bump, a better camera and the same battery life. Why would anyone in their right minds pick a ZenFone 3 Max over the Redmi Note 3, at the current pricing?
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 09-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60% prestatie: 40% functionaliteiten: 70% beeldscherm: 75% mobiliteit: 90% afwerking: 70%
Bron: India Today EN→NL Archive.org version
Then there's the pricing. The ZenFone 3 Max (ZC553KL) will cost buyers Rs 17,999. That's right. It's mighty expensive and easily forgettable. Especially, when a phone like the Redmi 3S Prime offers so much more (even equally good battery life, at just about Rs 9,000) in actual usage. Not to forget, phones like the Moto G4 Plus and the Lenovo Vibe K5 Note are equally competitive.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 09-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 65%
Bron: The Mobile Indian EN→NL Archive.org version
ZenFone 3 Max Review: Maximised the battery experience The Zenfone 3 Max comes out as a decent smartphone to keep in your wish list. The battery output and camera performance are impressive. Even the performance will not disappoint.. The only issue that Asus needs to sort out at the earliest in to remove bloatware they need to give users freedom to choose what they want to download.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 09-11-2016
Bron: NDTV Gadgets EN→NL Archive.org version
The ZenFone Max name no longer means you're getting a one-trick pony, as this new model aims to offer a well-rounded solution to aspiring smartphone buyers. This shows in the new aesthetics, improved display and cameras, and of course, solid battery life. It would have made a perfect rival to Xiaomi’s Redmi Note 3, but Asus has priced the ZenFone 3 Max in line with higher aspirations. Keep in mind that the ZC520TL variant does fall in the Redmi's price range but it doesn't seem to match up to it, at least on paper. It's also important that you check the model number behind the box carefully as its easy to confuse the two versions.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 09-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70% prijs: 60% prestatie: 60% beeldscherm: 70% mobiliteit: 90% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Fone Arena EN→NL Archive.org version
The Zenfone 3 Max is quite a decent smartphone and this is something that can be said for the entire Zenfone range. It however lacks a differentiating factor. In fact even within it’s own product lineup, Asus would find it hard to set the Max aside given that phones like the Zenfone 3 Laser too have really good battery life.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 08-11-2016
Bron: Hardware Zone EN→NL Archive.org version
The ASUS ZenFone 3 Max will have a tough time measuring up to its own past model and rivals. For an extra S$50, you get a 1080p display and better battery life with the Xiaomi Redmi Note 3, but the same price will net you the older ZenFone Max that comes with a larger battery capacity and significantly longer battery life - exactly what we expect out of a "Max" class ZenFone product.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 04-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60% prijs: 60% prestatie: 40% functionaliteiten: 75% afwerking: 90%
Bron: Yugatech EN→NL Archive.org version
The Zenfone 3 Max is more of an update rather than an upgrade for the Max series of the Zenfone. The smaller screen size is the culprit behind the shrunken battery capacity. While it’s still above the standard Android phone battery life, it’s not as impressive as before or even when compared to its Zenfone 3 siblings.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 13-09-2016
Bron: Unbox EN→NL Archive.org version
The ZF3 Max is shaping up to be a promising smartphone on its own right – we’re in the middle of the review process of the phone and the review should be out by next week. Stay tuned till then.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 12-09-2016
Bron: Unbox EN→NL Archive.org version
While the original Zenfone Max delivered insane battery endurance, it sacrificed everything else to get that legendary battery performance. That’s not the case with the Zenfone 3 Max – while it performs a little worse in the battery department because of the smaller capacity, it’s a better phone in almost every other category. ASUS compromised a little bit on the battery to give users a phone that’s not just a glorified powerbank, and they’ve succeeded.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 12-09-2016
Bron: Unbox EN→NL Archive.org version
That’s pretty much it for this initial review for the Zenfone 3 Max. We’ll be running PCMark’s battery benchmark as soon as possible on this phone so you can watch out later on to see just how far the Zenfone 3 Max can go on a single charge. The Zenfone 3 Max is available to buy now, priced at Php 8,995.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 05-09-2016
Bron: Teltarif DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 22-05-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 82% prijs: 97% beeldscherm: 70% mobiliteit: 80%
Bron: Android Pit - 2/2017
Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 01-01-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Connect - 01/2017
Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 01-12-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 83%
Bron: Tom's Hardware DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 18-11-2016
Bron: Ocaholic.ch DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 20-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Notebooksbilliger Blog DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 05-07-2016
Bron: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 04-06-2017
Bron: PC Guia PT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 25-04-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Target HD PT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 01-02-2017
Bron: MrInformatica IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 18-02-2017
Bron: InstaNews IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 03-02-2017
Bron: Tecno User IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 12-12-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prijs: 95% prestatie: 75% beeldscherm: 85% mobiliteit: 90%
Bron: Tecnoandroid.it IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 30-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 75% prijs: 85% functionaliteiten: 75% mobiliteit: 85% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Optima IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 30-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 69% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 75%
Bron: Androidiani IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 23-11-2016
Bron: Megapk IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 02-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% functionaliteiten: 80% beeldscherm: 75% mobiliteit: 85%
Bron: Geek 4 You IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 31-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Techstation.it IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 24-10-2016
Bron: Smartphone Italia IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 21-10-2016
Beoordeling: prijs: 90% functionaliteiten: 80% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 70% ergonomie: 80%
Bron: Tech Different IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 05-10-2016
Bron: Hardwareready.it IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 04-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 77% prijs: 80% functionaliteiten: 70% beeldscherm: 70% mobiliteit: 90% ergonomie: 75%
Bron: Key for web IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 04-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 75%
Bron: Pianeta Cellulare IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 03-10-2016
Bron: Chimera Revo IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 28-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 83% prijs: 90% functionaliteiten: 75% mobiliteit: 95% afwerking: 80% ergonomie: 80%
Bron: Techzilla.it IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 26-09-2016
Bron: Leonardo.it Tech IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 26-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 79% prijs: 85% beeldscherm: 78% mobiliteit: 89% afwerking: 84% ergonomie: 82%
Bron: HDblog.it IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 25-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Lupo Kkio IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 22-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 75%
Bron: AndroidWorld.it IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 14-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 78% prijs: 80% beeldscherm: 75% ergonomie: 80%
Bron: Andrea Galeazzi IT→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 12-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 69% prijs: 70% beeldscherm: 65% mobiliteit: 89% afwerking: 72%
Bron: Top for Phone FR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 02-02-2017
Bron: AndroidPit.fr FR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 17-01-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: 01Net FR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 16-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 64% prestatie: 50% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 80%
Bron: Tabletowo PL→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 19-12-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 81% prestatie: 70% beeldscherm: 75% mobiliteit: 90% afwerking: 85%
Bron: Inceleme.co TR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 06-04-2017
Bron: Log.com.tr TR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 17-03-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 77%
Bron: Chip Online TR TR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 14-03-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 79%
Bron: Product Test RU→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 04-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 71%
Bron: Zing VN→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 24-03-2017
Bron: Zing VN→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 18-03-2017
Bron: The Gioididong VN→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 06-03-2017
Bron: XT Mobile VN→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 24-12-2016
Bron: The Gioididong VN→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 18-12-2016
Bron: XT Mobile VN→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 04-11-2016
Bron: Smartphone.bg BU→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 11-01-2017
Bron: Digitalportal.sk SK→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 03-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 75%
Commentaar
ARM Mali-T720 MP2:
Deze grafische kaarten voor notebooks zijn niet bruikbaar voor games. Als ze al games kunnen draaien, dan doen ze dat met grafische afwijkingen en heel lage framesnelheid. Voor gamers zijn deze chips ongeschikt! Kantoor en internet taken zijn, daarentegen, geen probleem voor deze GPUs.
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Grafische Kaarten en de passende Benchmark Tabel.
MT6737:
ARM-gebaseerd quad-core-SoC (4x Cortex-A53) met 64-bit-ondersteuning en een kloksnelheid tot 1.3 GHz.
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Processors.
5.20": Dit scherm is al redelijk groot voor een smartphone, maar wordt veelvuldig toegepast.
Grote schermformaten laten hogere resoluties toe. Details zoals letters zijn groter. Anderzijds is het energieverbruik lager bij kleine schermdiagonalen en de toestellen zijn kleiner, lichter en goedkoper.
>>Om de fijnheid van het scherm te vinden, kijk in onze DPI-lijst.
Asus: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. is een grote Taiwanese fabrikant van computerhardware gevestigd in Taipei, opgericht in 1989. Onder de merknaam Asus produceert het bedrijf een breed scala aan producten, waaronder laptops, desktops, moederborden, grafische kaarten, monitoren, smartphones en netwerkapparatuur, complete systemen en pc-onderdelen voor eindgebruikers.
Onder de merknaam ROG (Republic of Gamers) produceert ASUS gaming laptops die bij gamers bekend staan om hun krachtige specificaties, speciale grafische kaarten, schermen met hoge verversingssnelheid en geavanceerde koelsystemen.
Naast gaming wordt een breed scala aan notebooks aangeboden voor verschillende behoeften en budgetten, van ultraslanke en lichtgewicht ultrabooks tot veelzijdige 2-in-1 convertibles en budgetvriendelijke opties. In 2023 had Asus wereldwijd een marktaandeel van 7% op de pc-markt.
De klanttevredenheid over ASUS-notebooks heeft betrekking op de prestaties, de functies en de goede prijs-prestatieverhouding van ASUS-notebooks. Zoals bij elk merk zijn er echter af en toe meldingen van problemen zoals oververhitting, drivercompatibiliteit of problemen met de bouwkwaliteit.
74.97%: Dit cijfer is slecht. De meeste notebooks hebben een hoger cijfer. Dit is niet aanbevolen bij aankoop.
>> De verdere informatie kan worden gevonden in onze hulp voor de aankoop van laptops.