Apple MacBook Air 11 inch 2014-06 MD711LL/B
Laptopspecificaties
Price comparison
Gemiddelde van 10 score (van 18 beoordelingen)
Testrapporten voor de Apple MacBook Air 11 inch 2014-06 MD711LL/B
Bron: PC World EN→NL Archive.org version
After trying to wrangle cross-platform battery testing and seeing how many variables can go into the tests, I've decided that the best we can say is battery life on X platform is better for Y task. So, I can say quite comfortably that playing 1080p MKV files using VLC, the XPS 13 gives you better battery life.
Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 09-02-2015
Bron: Macworld.co.uk EN→NL Archive.org version
In 2013, when Apple reduced the price of the MacBook Pro with Retina display range, we stopped recommending the 13-inch MacBook Air on the basis that there was only £150 difference in price. As Apple has continued to drop prices we are still looking at just a £150 difference between the two ranges at the entry level. It's great to see Apple reducing prices across its MacBook ranges, but the lower prices of the MacBook Pro Retina range do have the effect of making the MacBook Air look less attractive in comparison. However, we still love the MacBook Air, which is lighter and thinner, although a fraction bigger than the MacBook Pro with Retina display. If it's the MacBook Air that you have your heart set on, you can't go wrong with it, but if you have a little more in your budget, then consider the MacBook Pro with Retina display because it's a really good deal in comparison.
Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 14-08-2014
Bron: V3.co.uk EN→NL Archive.org version
Featuring a better display, upgradable storage and an advanced Surface Pen digital stylus, the Surface Pro 3 is the winner of this vs review. However, having matched the Surface Pro 3 in performance and battery life, and featuring a more user-friendly laptop design, the MacBook Air definitely gave Microsoft's latest hybrid a run for its money and still is a significantly better choice for users more familiar with Apple's platform.
Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 13-08-2014
Bron: Stuff TV EN→NL Archive.org version
Even Apple's cheapest laptop is head and shoulders above most of its competitors, and in terms of build, battery life and usability the MacBook Air 11 is an all-round winner. It's also that most unusual of items: an Apple product which represents good value for money. That screen is really starting to show its age, though, so fingers crossed that Apple brings out an Air with Retina Display soon.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 28-06-2014
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% beeldscherm: 60% mobiliteit: 80%
Bron: CNet EN→NL Archive.org version
The 2014 MacBook Air, like the largely similar 2013 version, is all about battery life and portability. This 11-inch laptop, nearly the size of an iPad, now lasts almost as long as one, too. It could tip the balance in favor of the 11 for some. For others, though, an iPad plus keyboard might have replaced this already.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 27-06-2014
Beoordeling: Totale score: 83% prestatie: 80% mobiliteit: 90%
Bron: Macworld.co.uk EN→NL Archive.org version
Overall, we take our hats off to Microsoft for its Surface Pro 3. It really does have specs that rival the MacBook Air and portability that brings it closer to competing tablets. But when it actually comes to using the Surface Pro 3 as a laptop, it's not the most comfortable of activities. We find the MacBook Air wonderful to work on for long periods of time, and with that lengthy battery life it's more suitable for full-day use.
Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 30-05-2014
Bron: Computer Shopper EN→NL Archive.org version
The 2014 11-inch MacBook Air aptly demonstrates the truth of the age-old aphorism, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." Last year's $999 model delivered spectacular battery life, solid performance, and a truly outstanding keyboard and touch pad—all packaged in a sleek aluminum chassis—for a price comparable to most Windows-based ultrabooks.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 27-05-2014
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90%
Bron: Notebookreview.com EN→NL Archive.org version
This is a niche device, suitable for Apple users that need both portability and power. While it’s tempting to compare it to other Ultrabooks, it actually has a lot in common with the Surface Pro 2, which has very similar specs and is built for a very specific type of Windows user. For the platform agnostic looking for thin, light, and powerful, the MacBook Air is certainly worth considering. Its “acceptable” display and other drawbacks make it tough to outright recommend over any and all competition.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 21-05-2014
Beoordeling: Totale score: 75%
Bron: Macworld.co.uk EN→NL Archive.org version
With its lower price the 2014 11in MacBook Air is a great purchase. If you want the lightest laptop available there is no need to sacrifice power - the 11in MacBook Air is just as good as the 13in model. Unfortunately in some areas this year's model isn't quite as good as last year's model - the flash storage seems to be slower than it was in 2013. If you can get a discounted 11in 2013 MacBook Air from the Apple refurb store, it is still be worth considering as an alternative to the 2014 Mac Air model.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 15-05-2014
Beoordeling: Totale score: 100%
Bron: Gizmag EN→NL Archive.org version
If you already own the mid-2013 MacBook Air, then there's really no reason to consider this new model. The speed differences are far too subtle for you to even consider upgrading. And if you can find last year's model on the cheap, then I'd also recommend going that route. Save the money, and enjoy your shiny new 99 percent as good as this year's model MacBook Air.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 15-05-2014
Bron: Chip Test & Kauf - Heft 2/2015
Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 01-01-2015
Beoordeling: Totale score: 85%
Bron: Chip.de DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 09-09-2014
Beoordeling: Totale score: 73% prijs: 75% prestatie: 59% functionaliteiten: 33% beeldscherm: 64% mobiliteit: 97% ergonomie: 98%
Bron: Chip.de DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 29-07-2014
Beoordeling: Totale score: 81% prijs: 71% prestatie: 80% functionaliteiten: 56% beeldscherm: 68% mobiliteit: 99% ergonomie: 85%
Bron: Mac Easy - Heft 04/2014
Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 01-07-2014
Beoordeling: Totale score: 98%
Bron: Mac & i - Heft 04/2014
Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 01-07-2014
Bron: Hispazone ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 16-07-2014
Bron: CNet France FR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 06-10-2014
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Notebook-Center.ru RU→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 17-07-2014
Commentaar
Intel HD Graphics 5000: ULV geïntegreerde GPU (GT3) met 40 EU's (geen eDRAM) die je aantreft op enkele Haswell processors.
De meeste niet-veeleisende huidige games kunnen vloeiend draaien. Wees voorbereid op verminderde grafische weergave door lage detailinstellingen en lage resoluties. Toch verschaffen deze kaarten voldoende prestatie voor kantoor taken en video bekijken (niet voor HD videos).
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Grafische Kaarten en de passende Benchmark Tabel.
4260U: Haswell-gebaseerde ULV dual-core processor geklokt aan 1.4 GHz met ondersteuning voor Turbo Boost tot en met 2.7 GHz. Beschikt over een geïntegreerde HD Graphics 5000 en een dual-channel DDR3-geheugencontroller.
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Processors.
11.60": Deze schermdiagonaal is redelijk groot voor tablets maar klein voor subnotebooks. Sommige convertibles hebben ook dit formaat.
Grote schermformaten laten hogere resoluties toe. Details zoals letters zijn groter. Anderzijds is het energieverbruik lager bij kleine schermdiagonalen en de toestellen zijn kleiner, lichter en goedkoper.
>>Om de fijnheid van het scherm te vinden, kijk in onze DPI-lijst.
1.1 kg: Dit gewicht is typisch voor grote tablets, kleine subnotebooks, ultrabooks en convertibles met een 10-11 inch schermdiagonaal.
84.5%: Deze score moet gezien worden als gemiddeld, omdat het aantal notebooks dat hoger scoort ongeveer gelijk is aan het aantal dat lager scoort.
>> De verdere informatie kan worden gevonden in onze hulp voor de aankoop van laptops.