Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.2 GHz
Laptopspecificaties
Price comparison
Gemiddelde van 10 score (van 16 beoordelingen)
Testrapporten voor de Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.2 GHz
Bron: Techradar EN→NL Archive.org version
Apple has given the MacBook's performance a much-needed boost, and it helps OS X zip along much better. Its critical flaws remain, but the 2016 version is less of a risk than it was last year. We just wish it was a bit cheaper.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 11-08-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Laptop Mag EN→NL Archive.org version
The updated MacBook packs more performance and battery life into a wonderfully thin and light design, but Apple didn't address the biggest drawbacks.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 28-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Tab Times EN→NL Archive.org version
As a Mac user of many years, the 12-inch Macbook definitely requires a compromise in the way I work. For example, my 15-inch Macbook Pro with Retina Display powers a two screen set up and the Macbook 2016 is incapable of doing that, especially as none of Apple’s official adapters currently offer DisplayPort functionality. Ironically, Google makes a USB Type-C to DisplayPort adapter that is perfect for this task, but with the limitations of a single port, the Macbook doesn’t stack up to my particular usage.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 09-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 83%
Bron: Pocket Lint EN→NL Archive.org version
The 12-inch MacBook has divided opinion since day one, having done-away with a full-size USB port for the smaller USB Type-C. A couple of years down the line and this will be a more standard format, but the bigger issue is the MacBook's persistence to offer just one of these ports for both charging and connectivity. If you're a casual or cloud-based user that won't be a big issue though. Just as we said of the first iteration: the 12-inch MacBook is all about portability; it's a laptop so thin, so sleek, so light, that everything else has been pushed by the wayside.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 21-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Techradar EN→NL Archive.org version
Apple has given the MacBook's performance a much-needed boost, and it helps OS X zip along much better. Its critical flaws remain, but the 2016 version is less of a risk than it was last year. We just wish it was a bit cheaper.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 20-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Laptop Mag EN→NL Archive.org version
The 2016 MacBook is certainly an improvement over its predecessor. It's significantly faster, especially if you opt for the Core m5 model, and it lasts an hour longer on a charge, all while being extremely portable. I also continue to love the Retina display and don't really mind the flat butterfly keyboard.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 02-05-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Slashgear EN→NL Archive.org version
I'll be sticking with my first-gen MacBook, then, though that's not going to stop me recommending it to those who travel frequently, have mainstream needs for processing, and who are willing to pay a premium for OS X on a notebook that's still a relatively rare sight in the wild. Apple doesn't expect it to be the Mac for every user: that's why it's not the only Mac. Just make sure you're going into it with your eyes wide open.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 02-05-2016
Bron: It Pro EN→NL Archive.org version
The 12in Retina MacBook isn’t for everyone. If you value portability and battery life above all and predominately use wireless peripherals as well as cloud apps and storage, then this MacBook will be a great fit. If you use lots of demanding applications, need to connect lots of wired peripherals or just can’t get on with the low-travel keyboard, then one of Apple’s more conventional MacBooks will be a better choice.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 29-04-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Engadget EN→NL Archive.org version
Apple deserves credit for improving the MacBook's battery life and disk speeds, but other than that, this is, for better and worse, the same machine as last year's model. If you previously shied away from the 12-inch MacBook because of the "one port" thing, this still isn't the laptop for you.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 25-04-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 82%
Bron: Laptop Mag EN→NL Archive.org version
The 2016 MacBook is certainly an improvement over its predecessor. It's significantly faster, especially if you opt for the Core m5 model, and it lasts an hour longer on a charge, all while being extremely portable. I also continue to love the Retina display and don't really mind the flat butterfly keyboard.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 22-04-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: CNet EN→NL Archive.org version
In hands-on use, the new MacBook feels almost exactly like the previous version. If you've got the 2015 MacBook, there's no need to upgrade, but if you were holding off to see what the second generation looked like, the potential boost to performance and battery life makes me feel even more confident about using this as primary laptop, especially for frequent travelers.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 21-04-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 84% prestatie: 80% mobiliteit: 80%
Bron: Notebooksbilliger Blog DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 08-06-2016
Bron: Spiegel Online DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 30-05-2016
Bron: Mobileimho.ru RU→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 06-04-2017
Bron: 3DNews.ru RU→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 12-07-2016
Bron: Ferra.ru RU→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 21-06-2016
Commentaar
Intel HD Graphics 515:
Geïntegreerde GPU (GT2) met 24 EU's die aangetroffen wordt in Core M-CPU's van de Skylake-generatie (4.5 Watt TDP).
De meeste niet-veeleisende huidige games kunnen vloeiend draaien. Wees voorbereid op verminderde grafische weergave door lage detailinstellingen en lage resoluties. Toch verschaffen deze kaarten voldoende prestatie voor kantoor taken en video bekijken (niet voor HD videos).
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Grafische Kaarten en de passende Benchmark Tabel.
6Y54:
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Processors.
12.00": Deze schermdiagonaal is redelijk groot voor tablets maar klein voor subnotebooks. Sommige convertibles hebben ook dit formaat.
Grote schermformaten laten hogere resoluties toe. Details zoals letters zijn groter. Anderzijds is het energieverbruik lager bij kleine schermdiagonalen en de toestellen zijn kleiner, lichter en goedkoper.
>>Om de fijnheid van het scherm te vinden, kijk in onze DPI-lijst.
0.92 kg: Meestal hebben grote tablets en convertibles dit gewicht.
77.9%: Dit cijfer is niet echt overtuigend. Het moet in acht worden genomen dat er bijna geen laptops zijn die een score onder de 60% hebben. Dit notebook is beneden gemiddeld beoordeeld, en is niet aanbevolen te kopen.
>> De verdere informatie kan worden gevonden in onze hulp voor de aankoop van laptops.